The UK Babe Channels Forum
Alice (Queen of Babestation 2017) - Night Show - Chat & Discussion (Only) - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: Alice Goodwin (/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Thread: Alice (Queen of Babestation 2017) - Night Show - Chat & Discussion (Only) (/showthread.php?tid=61063)



RE: Alice (Queen of Babestation 2017) - Night Show - Chat & Discussion (Only) - PetDetective - 22-01-2020 00:04

I wouldn't blame mr.p for the blur, he's not shy of being on camera. It has to be Alice that has insisted on it, none of the other girls do. I won't be paying for any of her shows in future, I'll save my money for the other girls.


RE: Alice (Queen of Babestation 2017) - Night Show - Chat & Discussion (Only) - shankey! - 22-01-2020 06:43

absolutely awful, i was fooled into thinking it may be a bit better so ventured in several times and it was a waste of money ,this is doing b/s no favours at all ,conning liars


RE: Alice (Queen of Babestation 2017) - Night Show - Chat & Discussion (Only) - babefan2012 - 22-01-2020 10:16

Yeah it’s now painfully obvious what this is for, milking you of your hard earned. The blurring of it means you have to pay just just to see if it’s anything, at least before unblurred you could kinda see how naff it was. I’m not a huge fan of MR P B/G shows anyway but with Alice it really is pointless.


RE: Alice (Queen of Babestation 2017) - Night Show - Chat & Discussion (Only) - King - 22-01-2020 11:14

(19-01-2020 22:21 )bombshell Wrote:  
(19-01-2020 19:50 )skully Wrote:  Mr.P content featuring Alice isn't allowed, a request was made, so posts with that content are removed.
There's a sticky about it in this section - https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=79336

Thanks for enlightening me,don't get the point, I miss the banter with you guys, but 90% of the time the channels no longer do it for me.

Tbh I'm the same..totally fallen away from babe channels but still buy custom vids..but heard about this b/g scam..I had to see it for myself, saw Kayleigh's show..wow was so bad then Alice last night...feel bad for peeps that have fallen for it.


RE: Alice (Queen of Babestation 2017) - Night Show - Chat & Discussion (Only) - ShandyHand - 22-01-2020 17:05

(22-01-2020 10:16 )babefan2012 Wrote:  .... The blurring of it means you have to pay just just to see if it’s anything...

Only if guys let it.Wink

I know you probably know all this babefan but let's examine this: It's simple... until someone reports on here that it's definitely genuine simply assume that it's not. I mean it's not like anyone's gonna miss out on much if they suddenly decide to stop scamming on this is it? Because it's not likely any babe would then stop at one HC show if she commited to go for it! Besides, if any main BS babe resolved to actually do the deed on camera do you think their marketing people wouldn't be all over it in advance? They would MAKE bloody SURE every punter knew the date it was happening well in advance.

Until then the quicker enough guys learn not to bother with the blur shows, and with babes who are ducking under the bottom of main cam screen to the same effect, the quicker it all comes to an end.

(22-01-2020 10:16 )babefan2012 Wrote:  ... at least before unblurred you could kinda see how naff it was. ...

These tricks only prosper because of the contrivance of not being able to see for sure; in not seeing guys convince themselves it might not be a trick. But if the guy simply stops to think: Is this the way they would really present real fucking - unannounced and in doubt - he will see that it has to be a falsehood. Every. Single. Time.


RE: Alice (Queen of Babestation 2017) - Night Show - Chat & Discussion (Only) - 2015watcher - 22-01-2020 17:13

The BS doesn’t stand for babestation it stands for blatant scam laugh Really is a big mystery to me how some people can be that gullible to believe these mr p shows are real? False advertising at its best and clearly Alice and the others doing these types of shows don’t care and just love rinsing as much money as possible from these gullible folk which says plenty about them really bladewave


RE: Alice (Queen of Babestation 2017) - Night Show - Chat & Discussion (Only) - babefan2012 - 22-01-2020 19:32

(22-01-2020 17:05 )ShandyHand Wrote:  
(22-01-2020 10:16 )babefan2012 Wrote:  .... The blurring of it means you have to pay just just to see if it’s anything...

Only if guys let it.Wink

I know you probably know all this babefan but let's examine this: It's simple... until someone reports on here that it's definitely genuine simply assume that it's not. I mean it's not like anyone's gonna miss out on much if they suddenly decide to stop scamming on this is it? Because it's not likely any babe would then stop at one HC show if she commited to go for it! Besides, if any main BS babe resolved to actually do the deed on camera do you think their marketing people wouldn't be all over it in advance? They would MAKE bloody SURE every punter knew the date it was happening well in advance.

Until then the quicker enough guys learn not to bother with the blur shows, and with babes who are ducking under the bottom of main cam screen to the same effect, the quicker it all comes to an end.

(22-01-2020 10:16 )babefan2012 Wrote:  ... at least before unblurred you could kinda see how naff it was. ...

These tricks only prosper because of the contrivance of not being able to see for sure; in not seeing guys convince themselves it might not be a trick. But if the guy simply stops to think: Is this the way they would really present real fucking - unannounced and in doubt - he will see that it has to be a falsehood. Every. Single. Time.

Agreed.


RE: Alice (Queen of Babestation 2017) - Night Show - Chat & Discussion (Only) - Everlong - 25-01-2020 02:51

I'm sure Alice used to have thicker thighs and more of an arse Sad


RE: Alice (Queen of Babestation 2017) - Night Show - Chat & Discussion (Only) - The Silent Majority - 25-01-2020 06:41

(22-01-2020 17:05 )ShandyHand Wrote:  These tricks only prosper because of the contrivance of not being able to see for sure; in not seeing guys convince themselves it might not be a trick. But if the guy simply stops to think: Is this the way they would really present real fucking - unannounced and in doubt - he will see that it has to be a falsehood. Every. Single. Time.

In the words of one of Bs's more honest representatives...

(10-01-2020 20:50 )Atlantamoreno Wrote:  real boy girl isn’t permitted on set- as in actual insertion.

I think if that policy ever changes, it's going to be either Atlanta or Anna, but not Alice.


RE: Alice (Queen of Babestation 2017) - Night Show - Chat & Discussion (Only) - shankey! - 25-01-2020 10:11

(25-01-2020 06:41 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  
(22-01-2020 17:05 )ShandyHand Wrote:  These tricks only prosper because of the contrivance of not being able to see for sure; in not seeing guys convince themselves it might not be a trick. But if the guy simply stops to think: Is this the way they would really present real fucking - unannounced and in doubt - he will see that it has to be a falsehood. Every. Single. Time.

In the words of one of Bs's more honest representatives...

(10-01-2020 20:50 )Atlantamoreno Wrote:  real boy girl isn’t permitted on set- as in actual insertion.

I think if that policy ever changes, it's going to be either Atlanta or Anna, but not Alice.

well thats not strictly true is it ? unless it regards penatration by penis, as a few of the girls have had fingers and toys inserted into them by mr p ,for me its the fakery of the model doing anything to him,which i think would make a massive difference ,some of the girls of coarse wouldnt be comfortable with this ,but if thats the case they shouldnt be charging an arm and leg to make out they are and leave these type of shows to the girls who are willing