+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Show Formats & Content (/forumdisplay.php?fid=412)
+---- Thread: Babe Channel's - Member Websites (/showthread.php?tid=14224)
RE: Honest site appraisal - sirfunkalot - 15-01-2010 19:52
The babes sites are probably all controlled by the same people who run the babestation site, and the content is pretty much the same apart from Amandas, Jemmas and Dani. These 3 are only worth one shout every year. The problem is they don't update regularly so not worth spending money for a month when you might get 1 update.
I have been on Brooke lees site and yes there's no full frontal nudity from the majority of the girls, but it gets updated every day and a range of birds on there. I liked Brookes site as you could see the whole site content for £3 for 2days access, which has stopped so I'd wait a month for new content before i pay for a months access.
Sexstation was good a while back, regular updates and the spycam was good as you could control it and see what you wanted to see from the girl on the main cam. Most of the hot girls left, but slowly more girls are coming back.
Vikki T's site has to be the worst and so is elites, 10 pic galleries of nothing really, and Vikki's is worse as you have to subscribe to at least 2 months to get to see the pics at high res, if you sign for 1 month you only get small low res shots, total con.
Karinas sites good, bit of hardcore and dildo work and lots of full frontal, but again slow updates.
trying to think of any other girls sites that are good. I think there's nothing worth shouting about, I'd pay for sites like suburbánamatuérs, good range of girls some of the channel babes on there, but guaranteed girl hot sets of british girls.
I now scan the net for the girl sets or even hunt down free passwords. It's not hard to find, the net is a wonderful place.
RE: Honest site appraisal - SirAssAlot - 15-01-2010 20:46
Amandas, Jemmas & Tiffany's sites are updated every week or every few weeks that i do know from when i was a member As for Babestation, Elite's & Vicky Thomas sites they aren't worth the time & money spent on them!!
sirfunkalot Is right about Vicky T's site All the pics are small plus she blackmails members saying you qualify for hq pics in 30 days meaning you've to join for 2 months to see all of her pics in HQ hmm who the hell does she think she is......
Best website to join? - barteric - 24-01-2010 19:34
hey guys any tips 4 witch website to pay 4 next?
ive payed 4 lollys badcocks and angel longs website and were both well worth it
BUT Elite tv was total waste money
i want a website wiv rare pics help me out guys xxx
RE: Best website to join? - cheesyboy - 24-01-2010 19:53
hi mate, check out my thread in the babestation section about charlie c's website. its has really good sets and videos of charlie, only downside the now, its not been updated for 3 weeks.
cheesyboy.
RE: Honest site appraisal - Winston Wolfe - 05-02-2010 15:26
I'd be interested to know what the actual figures are for the Cellcast websites... Compared to other competitors in the adult industry, and even the girls individually, there seems to be no balance between content and the pricing structure.
From what I've seen and heard, most of them need to be revamped...
RE: Honest site appraisal - chrislatimer - 05-02-2010 15:55
it seems some of the girls are less bothered about their sites then others, as some use their blogs a lot more then others, and some seem to be updated a lot more.
i dont think the sites have been as successful as cellcast wanted tho
RE: Honest site appraisal - seth - 05-02-2010 17:15
Why waste your money on any of these sites when there's far more explicit stuff for free?
RE: Honest site appraisal - SirAssAlot - 05-02-2010 17:51
I re joined Yvette's site a while ago & my 1st thoughts were Bloody WooW cause in her latest 3 updates she had her pinky out but from her newest set it looks like it’s going back to tits only
. My opinion would be don't waste your money joining it.I miss that amazing ass of hers already but not some of her chats cause they scare the crap out of me
RE: Honest site appraisal - Winston Wolfe - 08-02-2010 18:05
(05-02-2010 15:55 )chrislatimer Wrote: it seems some of the girls are less bothered about their sites then others, as some use their blogs a lot more then others, and some seem to be updated a lot more.
i dont think the sites have been as successful as cellcast wanted tho
I was involved with a website for 4 years, so it's clear for me to see the mistakes Cellcast have made. They didn't get their strategy right, and it looks like Elite are going down the same path too...
Question is are they bothered about turning things around?
RE: Honest site appraisal - Winston Wolfe - 08-02-2010 18:07
(05-02-2010 17:15 )seth Wrote: Why waste your money on any of these sites when there's far more explicit stuff for free?
That's a fair point, but I'm just looking at it from a business point of view... I can give an obvious benchmark example of someone in the adult industry who makes a fortune. There is no comparison in terms of content and price, yet Cellcast and Elite charge more or less the same...
They're not the only ones though... Most people in the UK overvalue their business, and overcharge for their products/services.