+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Babeworld (/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+---- Thread: Ladyboys - a serious debate (/showthread.php?tid=17641)
RE: Ladyboys - a serious debate - vostok 1 - 23-02-2010 23:29
(23-02-2010 23:12 )astonv1 Wrote: I didn't know that some of these Asian Babes were actually Asian dudes
Now personally i hold no prejudice towards people with differing sexual tendancies but I think really they should be making it more clear on this channel that its possible you could be talking to a guy.
I think that was Stan's point.
Perhaps it would be beneficial to all to have the onscreen captions reflect this. To let the potential caller know who they would be talking to.
As previously mentioned, the Lady Boys seem to be the most popular in relation to call minutes, so onscreen captions could increase the amount of calls also.
RE: Ladyboys - a serious debate - seth - 24-02-2010 02:50
(23-02-2010 19:04 )SOOPSOOP Wrote: I like how you say I'm not homophobe but call homosexuals 'queer'
That would be like saying I'm not racist about these n*&^%$£rs!
Calling homosexuals queers does not make him homophobic. Sure you could argue it's inappropriate language but making a homophobic comment and being homophobic are two different things. The same applies to racist comments.
In regards to this channel. If these are ladyboys then surely what this channel is doing is illegal as they're deceiving the public.
Anyway, I don't bother with the channel.
"girls" on the asian channel - gyalis_star - 26-02-2010 01:30
i havent been on here in a while but kinda thought i had to speak out after having a quick look through the notice board, i just wanted to no am i the only person thats noticed a few of the girls on that asian channel have pulges in there underwear? that there constantly repositionin them self? some one please tell me that iam wrong cause if thats not false advertising i dunno what is!
RE: "girls" on the asian channel - Chilly - 26-02-2010 01:32
^^^^ Send StanTheMan a PM. He loves this stuff.
RE: Ladyboys - a serious debate - StanTheMan - 26-02-2010 05:02
(23-02-2010 13:31 )Josh187 Wrote: I could not hardly care to be honest - i don't watch the channel, i never have really, and i have no plan to, it's most certainly the worst babe channel out there - so why care so much about?Because we don't all hold the same views and opinions, maybe?
Quote:Maybe they couldn't find many genuine decent Asian babes to put on this channel so they turn to men? who knows?The majority of the presenters are women, which is why I watch it. They never used to have shemales.
RE: Ladyboys - a serious debate - StanTheMan - 26-02-2010 05:05
(23-02-2010 22:48 )thinwhiteduke Wrote: Stan i'll take your word for it that you're not homophobic but why on another thread did you think it appropriate to call them "freaks" ?
Fair question, thinwhiteduke. It was wrong of me, I apologise, but it was said in anger.
Now I suppose someone's going to ask me how many 'freaks' I've beaten up in 'anger'
RE: Ladyboys - a serious debate - Sooky™ - 26-02-2010 05:18
Stan - how many 'freaks' have you beaten up in 'anger'?
RE: Ladyboys - a serious debate - StanTheMan - 26-02-2010 13:14
(26-02-2010 05:18 )SxciiSooky Wrote: Stan - how many 'freaks' have you beaten up in 'anger'?
Oh, man! Loads! I've lost count.
Asian Babes- or is it? - amandasnumerounofan - 22-03-2010 19:06
Due to the fact that they have so many ladyboys, does anybody else find the title of the channel misleading.
RE: Asian Babes- or is it? - Josh187 - 22-03-2010 19:11
Not another Asian babes thread, Yes the title is misleading but i think they know, no one will call up a bunch of ladyboys, so they pretend they are 'babes' I just hope the ladyboys have perfected their women voices
I honestly couldn't careless about this channel. No one cares for this channel other than StanTheMan, so couldn't you of talked to him about this in private.
