The UK Babe Channels Forum
Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation Xtra (/forumdisplay.php?fid=150)
+--- Thread: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=17684)



RE: Babestation One to encrypt? - tony confederate - 01-03-2010 16:25

(01-03-2010 15:15 )chrislatimer Wrote:  none of the main girls would do it.

Is that a statement of fact or is it an opinion?


RE: Babestation One to encrypt? - HEX!T - 01-03-2010 17:16

pretty much a statement of fact. a couple of em would be up for it. the likes of lolly and michele moist maybe, but paige and ella?, no m8 it just wouldn't happen. it would be a wet dream if it did, but its very very VERY doubtful.
i for 1 have never seen ella take her pantys off. neither have i seen her rub her pussy with intent. she has a dirty mouth and a fit bod, but thats as far as it goes im afraid.


RE: Babestation One to encrypt? - TheWatcher - 01-03-2010 17:38

(01-03-2010 13:22 )admin Wrote:  You don't need to reveal your source or say anything more. As already stated, Babestation may well be trying something 'extra' before very long.

They're probably just launching Babe Jet to compete with Bang Airways. Big Grin


RE: Babestation One to encrypt? - admin. - 02-03-2010 07:45

(01-03-2010 14:26 )sweetsugar007 Wrote:  Well Mr Admin if its not free and you going to charge I have an idea. make the charge a nightly one and allow people to do it via the premium text service.

You might be pleasantly surprised.


RE: Babestation One to encrypt? - PersonaNonGrata - 02-03-2010 07:54

(01-03-2010 10:34 )hucker123 Wrote:  dont start charging people to watch babestation that will be a no go from the off when its been free for years do something decent for a change you tight fucks

Totally agree - this isn't America, where dimwit redneckss pay twice over for everything!


RE: Babestation One to encrypt? - sweetsugar007 - 02-03-2010 09:03

If they are going that route and people have a choice such as watch the normal service as is or watch something harder and pay x amount then people have a choice its simple. Then there can be no more complaining about not rubbing pussy with intent etc

It would not bother me personally if I wanted to watch a girl who I know would not do it then fine, if I wanted to watch Lolly in all her glory then I know the score!!


RE: Babestation One to encrypt? - Winston Wolfe - 02-03-2010 15:22

(02-03-2010 07:54 )PersonaNonGrata Wrote:  
(01-03-2010 10:34 )hucker123 Wrote:  dont start charging people to watch babestation that will be a no go from the off when its been free for years do something decent for a change you tight fucks

Totally agree - this isn't America, where dimwit redneckss pay twice over for everything!

Babestation, and all the free-to-air phone sex channels that followed, have never been free... If nobody ever paid for any of the services advertised onscreen, then they would all be out of business!


RE: Babestation One to encrypt? - PersonaNonGrata - 02-03-2010 23:15

(02-03-2010 15:22 )Winston Wolfe Wrote:  
(02-03-2010 07:54 )PersonaNonGrata Wrote:  
(01-03-2010 10:34 )hucker123 Wrote:  dont start charging people to watch babestation that will be a no go from the off when its been free for years do something decent for a change you tight fucks

Totally agree - this isn't America, where dimwit redneckss pay twice over for everything!

Babestation, and all the free-to-air phone sex channels that followed, have never been free... If nobody ever paid for any of the services advertised onscreen, then they would all be out of business!

You're not getting it - when I said about americans paying twice over, I meant once for the service, and again to call the girls.

Anyway, thinking about it, there's already a "hardcore" service - 3G, so I guess it will just be like that, only televised. Fortunately for me (and my wallet) my favorite girls are the glamour babes who will no doubt stay on the free (and freeview) channels (at least I hope so!)

If others want porn stars (and a few old slappers) on pay per view, that's up to them.


RE: Babestation One to encrypt? - chrislatimer - 02-03-2010 23:22

(02-03-2010 23:15 )PersonaNonGrata Wrote:  
(02-03-2010 15:22 )Winston Wolfe Wrote:  
(02-03-2010 07:54 )PersonaNonGrata Wrote:  
(01-03-2010 10:34 )hucker123 Wrote:  dont start charging people to watch babestation that will be a no go from the off when its been free for years do something decent for a change you tight fucks

Totally agree - this isn't America, where dimwit redneckss pay twice over for everything!

Babestation, and all the free-to-air phone sex channels that followed, have never been free... If nobody ever paid for any of the services advertised onscreen, then they would all be out of business!

You're not getting it - when I said about americans paying twice over, I meant once for the service, and again to call the girls.

Anyway, thinking about it, there's already a "hardcore" service - 3G, so I guess it will just be like that, only televised. Fortunately for me (and my wallet) my favorite girls are the glamour babes who will no doubt stay on the free (and freeview) channels (at least I hope so!)

If others want porn stars (and a few old slappers) on pay per view, that's up to them.

a man after my own heart, all the girls that arent glamourous enough to do tv, so they do 3g if they go on pay per view that would be alright as i wouldnt pay for them anyway.


RE: Babestation One to encrypt? - mrben - 03-03-2010 01:39

have to agree with the 2 above points. i watch the babe shows because i want glamour model quality babes. if you want less looks & more action there is plenty on the net. having said that anything extra rather than replacing or altering is always welcome pay or no pay