FAO Paige Lovers - Printable Version

FAO Paige Lovers - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: Babestation fanzone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=55)
+----- Forum: Paige Tyler (/forumdisplay.php?fid=119)
+----- Thread: FAO Paige Lovers (/showthread.php?tid=1791)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

RE: FAO Paige Lovers - BelfastBadBoy - 13-12-2008 19:19

Paige is a sexy momma no question of that,nobody would argue that lol but lets not get into the world of not trues

RE: FAO Paige Lovers - Dreamlander - 13-12-2008 21:18

There are 18 nude pics and 1 underwear pic for reference. That's 18 different heads to find and attach to some models body,can anyone even find 18 headshots of Paige on the web? If these are fake then the guy who did it must work for Industrial Light and Magic! He would probably be doing this with Angelina,Leighton,Lindsay etc. with talent like that.I believe these to be from about 3-4 years ago judging by the hair colour,similar to when she first joined Party People.
May I just re-iterate that I think Paige is awesome and in no way am I attacking her.Unless I see the original 'unaltered' images I will continue to see these photos for the gorgeous things they are.

Dreamlander

RE: FAO Paige Lovers - skateguy - 14-12-2008 06:21

mikepar Wrote:I look at the evidence and make conclusions based on evidence.

Ah, a CSI fan! Good to have you here on the forum Grissom Wink

RE: FAO Paige Lovers - Red - 14-12-2008 15:54

I'm not even going to go what conclusion I've drawn from the evidence I have and the experience with similar situations Sad

I could investigate further but my initial question was nothing to do with Paige but why you, Mikepar, seem so obsessed with trying to make yourself look important at have seemingly exclusive information.

I just hope from my experiences I am wrong this time and suggest you do not PM me again unless you have something worthwhile to say as I'd rather not associate with you if, based on my evidence and experience, my conclusions are correct

RE: FAO Paige Lovers - surreysub - 14-12-2008 16:44

Was Mikepar trying to protect the dignity of a girl whose job it is to lay on a sofa on TV and fake conversation with callers paying £1.50 a minute?

Too late my friend, pardon the crudeness but we've all seen her minge.

RE: FAO Paige Lovers - BelfastBadBoy - 14-12-2008 16:53

Mike i'm sure is a nice fella but he blew a totaly simple thing up to a drama lol

RE: FAO Paige Lovers - datalossfs - 14-12-2008 17:06

OP if you bait people they are going bite off your head... This is the internet after all.

RE: FAO Paige Lovers - Moorey - 14-12-2008 17:15

Well, if this site doesn't become public knowledge she isn't going to get much revenue from it.

Personally, I think she's a sexy girl and this was blown out of proportion. While I say that, I wouldn't have subscribed. Would have just been interested in seeing how professionally done the site was.

Though, if she isn't going to get naked... I'm sorry but is there any point? Only the most hardcore of fans would join in such a case.

I wish her all the success she can get though. She seems to be a lovely girl.

*Edit* Yay 100 posts :|

RE: FAO Paige Lovers - jordo - 14-12-2008 17:18

Well done Moorey, a great point to make with your 100th post Smile

RE: FAO Paige Lovers - Headlessman - 17-12-2008 01:26

Here's some sexy pics of Paige I found