+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom (/showthread.php?tid=2776)
RE: Ofcom - A Spider Monkey - 12-01-2009 20:36
dondoe Wrote:Am I the only person who thinks that alot of the channels use Ofcom as an excuse for the softness of their programs?????
No, I have thought that a few times myself.
RE: Ofcom - HEX!T - 12-01-2009 20:37
lol... most complaints come from rival channels if you flick through the links you will see that the last complaint made about livexxx wasnt made by joe public, basicaly when they do this they shoot themselfs in the foot.
RE: Ofcom - HEX!T - 12-01-2009 20:37
oh and the rowan atkinson skit was fekin funny...
RE: Ofcom - southlondonphil - 12-01-2009 21:03
A Spider Monkey Wrote:dondoe Wrote:Am I the only person who thinks that alot of the channels use Ofcom as an excuse for the softness of their programs?????
No, I have thought that a few times myself.
I think the web shows prove this theory wrong.
If the channels only want to do the softest shows, why are all the girls going much further on the web streams?
I rest my case.
RE: Ofcom - Jack Vikare - 12-01-2009 21:05
southlondonphil Wrote:I think the web shows prove this theory wrong.
If the channels only want to do the softest shows, why are all the girls going much further on the web streams?
I rest my case.
Good point. I think your case is proven.
RE: Ofcom - elgar1uk - 13-01-2009 09:00
Jack Vakire Wrote:southlondonphil Wrote:I think the web shows prove this theory wrong.
If the channels only want to do the softest shows, why are all the girls going much further on the web streams?
I rest my case.
Good point. I think your case is proven.
Yes, it looks as though dondoe's argument is dismissed.
RE: Ofcom - dondoe returns - 13-01-2009 19:54
southlondonphil Wrote:A Spider Monkey Wrote:dondoe Wrote:Am I the only person who thinks that alot of the channels use Ofcom as an excuse for the softness of their programs?????
No, I have thought that a few times myself.
I think the web shows prove this theory wrong.
If the channels only want to do the softest shows, why are all the girls going much further on the web streams?
I rest my case.
Oh contre' good sir.......if you notice most night girls don't do the web stream because it's too explicit for them,only those girls who have done adult work do it,so my theory is that most night girls won't work to that level......Remember the old days with Flash the Gash and Peek of Pussy?????
They were allowed to do that????
RE: Ofcom - Dreamlander - 13-01-2009 20:26
I am sure there is some sort of self imposed censorship by the channels owners.For instance Sky can PIN protect any channel,free or encrypted so that they could show hotter stuff on freeview during the day but then who would subscribe to the pay channels? After 9pm all the freeview channels could be PIN protected and then if you paid or not you would get the same level of explicitness.I am not saying that this is the entire answer but if Sky suddenly got a moral conscience and PIN protected all 900 channels 24/7 then the adult channels would have a real problem on their hands and you would finally know who imposes the censorship. What I don't understand is how 327 and 328 can show so much full frontal nudity and they are just a movie channel and seemingly pass under Ofcoms radar.And don't get me started on How To Look Good Naked!!! Primetime porn!!!
Dreamlander
RE: Ofcom - southlondonphil - 13-01-2009 20:27
dondoe Wrote:Oh contre' good sir.......if you notice most night girls don't do the web stream because it's too explicit for them,only those girls who have done adult work do it,so my theory is that most night girls won't work to that level......Remember the old days with Flash the Gash and Peek of Pussy?????
They were allowed to do that????
They are not allowed to do it anymore though (I'm sad to say).
RE: Ofcom - BarrieBF - 13-01-2009 20:35
Dreamlander Wrote:I am not saying that this is the entire answer but if Sky suddenly got a moral conscience and PIN protected all 900 channels 24/7 then the adult channels would have a real problem on their hands and you would finally know who imposes the censorship.
The 900 channels are blocked already for anyone who chooses to do so.