+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: The Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=408)
+--- Thread: **Ultimate Babe 2011** - Discussion, suggestions, opinions... (/showthread.php?tid=40517)
RE: **Ultimate Babe 2011** - Discussion, suggestions, opinions... - Regenerated - 02-11-2011 19:01
(02-11-2011 18:59 )mr mystery Wrote:(02-11-2011 18:49 )Jam Da Man Wrote:(02-11-2011 17:38 )Scotsman Wrote: So far, this is the list of babes I have compiled, if anyone has any I've missed, start suggesting now and I'll add them...
Babestation
~~
Cherri
Rosie
Siobhan Hughes
Are the Daytime babes who appear on "Tease Hour" to be classed as night-time babes?
Gracie should be included in this list, if so.
If this is the case then Sara Matty should also be on the list .
After all the totally unfair flack she's got on here from people, I'm guessing it won't be a popular choice.
RE: **Ultimate Babe 2011** - Discussion, suggestions, opinions... - skully - 02-11-2011 19:02
The tease stuff should be left out, it just complicates things unnecessarily...including moderating
It should be a clear day and night choice imo.
RE: **Ultimate Babe 2011** - Discussion, suggestions, opinions... - Regenerated - 02-11-2011 19:25
Well said Skully, that should include tease hours for all channels. Red Light's list shouldn't contain Holly McGuire for example. She is daytime who occasionally does the odd tease hour.
I just don't think tease hours can be called nightshows.
RE: **Ultimate Babe 2011** - Discussion, suggestions, opinions... - mr williams - 02-11-2011 19:46
(02-11-2011 19:02 )skully Wrote: It should be a clear day and night choice imo.
I understand entirely where you're coming from but the smaller channels have girls who genuinely do both eg Roxy and Hannah on Storm and Daisy Dash on Xxxp. If Chatgirls nightshow doesn't come to fruition then (as a matter of current fact) Sammie Dee and Denni Tayla have to go into the "day" category!
RE: **Ultimate Babe 2011** - Discussion, suggestions, opinions... - Scotsman - 02-11-2011 19:54
It's my intention to leave out Tease Hour girls as I mentioned in my original post, but Siobhan Hughes has done a number of night shows this year after the 10pm watershed and I've seen Cherri doing this too unless I'm mistaken?
I think there's so many babes at the moment who do both day and night that it seems unfair to exclude them from this tournament, but if that's the general consensus it's something I'd consider changing though it would be unfortunate on girls like Jennifer Jade for example, who performs exceptionally well at night but is mainly a daytime girl.
Given that ChatGirl is only on TV until 10pm, should they be bumped from the tourney entirely?
This is basically the purpose of this thread, to iron out these kinds of issues before the tournament begins to minimise the arguing when it actually begins.
RE: **Ultimate Babe 2011** - Discussion, suggestions, opinions... - Regenerated - 02-11-2011 20:06
There's another point about Chat Girl TV. Some of their babes (Demi, Sammie, Denni, Lauren, Amanda, Lucy and Belle all spring to mind) have done after hours nudity shows on the webstream. Just wondering would this be considered a nightshow as there's nudity involved and its on for at least another hour after 10?
RE: **Ultimate Babe 2011** - Discussion, suggestions, opinions... - Scotsman - 02-11-2011 21:48
I'll probably leave the CGTV girls in unless there's massive opposition to it from the masses.
An extremely helpful poster has messaged me privately with the suggestion of scrapping the groups and instead having a system where everyone picks their top 16 babes, in order, and each babe gets points based on where they are listed, from 16-1 and the 16 babes with the most points will progress into the seeded knockout stage. This is something I'm seriously considering. It will make the first round a lot more open and give everyone a level ground to start on.
What's the general consensus on this?
RE: **Ultimate Babe 2011** - Discussion, suggestions, opinions... - eagle_si - 02-11-2011 21:58
(02-11-2011 21:48 )Scotsman Wrote: An extremely helpful poster has messaged me privately with the suggestion of scrapping the groups and instead having a system where everyone picks their top 16 babes, in order, and each babe gets points based on where they are listed, from 16-1 and the 16 babes with the most points will progress into the seeded knockout stage. This is something I'm seriously considering. It will make the first round a lot more open and give everyone a level ground to start on.
What's the general consensus on this?
Excellent idea. That way you don't need to vote for girls you hardly know, and it gives more weight (not literally of course) to those who you like the most. Though the number doesn't have to be 16, it could be 8 or 10, or any other figure which seems best. It will also make the seedings more transparent.
RE: **Ultimate Babe 2011** - Discussion, suggestions, opinions... - dayb4yesterday - 02-11-2011 22:00
1. Caty Cole 2. Ava Blue 3. Alice Goodwin
RE: **Ultimate Babe 2011** - Discussion, suggestions, opinions... - Scotsman - 02-11-2011 22:01
It's either 16 or 32 as they lead into the knockout stages more neatly and I reckon 32 is far too many, so if I do it that way, it'll most likely be 16.
The seedings for the knockout stages in the previous two years were based on number of votes in the previous round so it'll be the same in that respect.