+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Calling The Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=409)
+---- Thread: Abusive Callers!!! (/showthread.php?tid=44931)
RE: Abusive Callers!!! - The Silent Majority - 31-03-2012 22:55
Apologies for my poor sense of humour but you can usually tell a decent joke by the number of thanks it gets
(31-03-2012 11:52 )iloveMegan Wrote: The "
Still don't see how that's relevant in this thread.
RE: Abusive Callers!!! - kelly1066 - 01-04-2012 00:45
that 'guy' on twitter... and i use the word loosely...... really needs to wake up and smell the bacon....??!!
sex worker, telephone prostitute...??? last time i checked, you had to actually be able to touch the person to be considered a prostitute... no matter what words you're using..... so unless he can push his hand/cock/mouth through his phone, along the radiowaves that send the call to the other phone, and then pop out through the girls phones.... and they can do likewise... then they are no more prostitutes than any other phone workers...???
this guy clearly had either serious sexual problems, or just mental health issues, and really needs to be reported to twitter by the girls he is abusing.... there must be some law or rules on there.... if people can be done for racial abuse like those to do with stan collymore and fabrice muamba then this guy can also surely be found, made to stop this vile abuse, and sorted out...???
RE: Abusive Callers!!! - Roquentin - 01-04-2012 01:48
Yeah just checked through that John Parsons twitter. A strange one to work out. The sex worker thing goes back to September at least, pretty consistently with little else so looks like a twitter dedicated to this kind of harassment. Apart from how riling it is to see, it is actually put in a fairly measured way, which makes it all the more annoying (as in the way he presumes the obviousness of what he is says is annoying). As such it probably technically isn't harassment but we know the score and it certainly feels like it is.
He also seems to know the names of quite a few babes from quite a few different channels, which would take working out last names etc. and relating them to twitter feeds. So I would say that suggests he actually watches the babeshows himself (presume its a he). So his 'investigation' into how the babes view their own work may also reflect his own personal conflicts. Either that or he simply is trying to irritate, or perhaps he gets a sexual kick out of it. None of those three motivations are particularly admirable, and he is deceiving himself if he thinks he is being reasonable about it.
RE: Abusive Callers!!! - iloveMegan - 01-04-2012 10:09
(31-03-2012 22:55 )The Silent Majority Wrote: Apologies for my poor sense of humour but you can usually tell a decent joke by the number of thanks it gets
Or you could just make up your own mind instead of following the herd
(31-03-2012 22:55 )The Silent Majority Wrote: Still don't see how that's relevant in this thread.
It was in response to Paul71's post about an alleged "fake account" on twitter (it's arguable if that post was relevant to an "Abusive Callers" thread if you want to go down that road but anyway...), I was just pointing out that some girls use different names for different sites, just as some of these trolls do.
RE: Abusive Callers!!! - The Silent Majority - 02-04-2012 05:05
(01-04-2012 10:09 )iloveMegan Wrote: Or you could just make up your own mind instead of following the herd
I did, thanks
(01-04-2012 10:09 )iloveMegan Wrote: It was in response to Paul71's post about an alleged "fake account" on twitter (it's arguable if that post was relevant to an "Abusive Callers" thread if you want to go down that road but anyway...), I was just pointing out that some girls use different names for different sites, just as some of these trolls do.
Nope, sorry, still don't get the link between the girls who use 'stage names' for their work and trolls who use fake id's to abuse people.
You'll have to spell it out for me, I'm afraid.
RE: Abusive Callers!!! - iloveMegan - 02-04-2012 19:33
(02-04-2012 05:05 )The Silent Majority Wrote: You'll have to spell it out for me, I'm afraid.
Some girls use names other than their real name when working on the channels, shooting for certain sites or escorting. Some trolls use names other than their real name when trolling.
RE: Abusive Callers!!! - Digital Dave - 02-04-2012 20:16
^^^ But the models are still not anonymous are they? Whether they use different names for different sites is irrelevant as they're not using them to hide behind in order to spread abuse.
RE: Abusive Callers!!! - iloveMegan - 02-04-2012 20:42
(02-04-2012 20:16 )Digital Dave Wrote: Whether they use different names for different sites is irrelevant as they're not using them to hide behind in order to spread abuse.
They still use different names, not to spread abuse but they do "hide behind them" to a certain extent. There are models who work for tickling, bondage and even sites that are simply dedicated to certain clothing types and use different names for each. I agree it's pointless as obviously they look the same, I was just suggesting it's silly for the girls to dismiss anything a troll says with the "You're probably hiding behind a fake name" reasoning as many girls do the same. This is especially true for those who escort.
But I suppose it's either that or the "Get a job/life" card that gets played.
RE: Abusive Callers!!! - The Silent Majority - 02-04-2012 23:03
(02-04-2012 19:33 )iloveMegan Wrote: Some girls use names other than their real name when working on the channels, shooting for certain sites or escorting. Some trolls use names other than their real name when trolling.
So what you're saying is - You think there's no real difference between Daryl Morgan, for instance, and some troll who sends death threats to the girls by twitter (that has actually happened)
RE: Abusive Callers!!! - iloveMegan - 03-04-2012 12:52
(02-04-2012 23:03 )The Silent Majority Wrote: So what you're saying is - You think there's no real difference between Daryl Morgan, for instance, and some troll who sends death threats to the girls by twitter (that has actually happened)
That's not what I'm saying at all. If the troll is using a fake name then they have that in common, but obviously they are both using different names for completely different reasons.