+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: The Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=408)
+--- Thread: To be naked or not naked? (/showthread.php?tid=53459)
RE: To be naked or not naked? - aaron - 01-03-2013 09:44
(28-02-2013 16:01 )Scottishbloke Wrote: it was FTA right up until the naughty show which was from midnight to 2am each night.
So the part which was "available without encryption" was no different to any other babe show?
RE: To be naked or not naked? - harry angel - 02-03-2013 11:42
(01-03-2013 09:44 )aaron Wrote: So the part which was "available without encryption" was no different to any other babe show?
Yes but for those who like to call the encrypted show of Sex Talk Live offered calls at 25ppm.
RE: To be naked or not naked? - rusty legrand - 03-03-2013 15:01
For the girls who are comfortable with being naked it doesn't restrict their movements and vice versa.
RE: To be naked or not naked? - SteveHG - 05-03-2013 01:16
Personally I think there's a time when it's good for a girl to go naked and others when it's better she doesn't. If a girl wants to do some raunchy open legged positions then obviously she can't be naked. At other times a bit of teasing is called for - again stripping off completely at the outset prevents this.
For me part of the excitement is the anticipation, the "will she won't she" moment. Clare Richards was the mistress of this (oh God I'm speaking of her in the past tense!).
Getting naked too readily and too often loses it for me. Lori is a case in point. Because you know she's pretty certain to go naked after a few seconds there's no excitement for me I'm afraid. Being naked all the time can also be restrictive - again, you know Lori is going to be forced to stay in one of a very few positions for often a very long time and there's very little variety as a result..
RE: To be naked or not naked? - Knight Templar - 05-03-2013 11:57
(05-03-2013 01:16 )SteveHG Wrote: If a girl wants to do some raunchy open legged positions then obviously she can't be naked.
Yes good point. For some shows at least it's better that the girl is not naked. In fact it's necessary that she's not naked.
RE: To be naked or not naked? - foxyfan - 05-03-2013 13:02
(05-03-2013 01:16 )SteveHG Wrote: Personally I think there's a time when it's good for a girl to go naked and others when it's better she doesn't. If a girl wants to do some raunchy open legged positions then obviously she can't be naked. At other times a bit of teasing is called for - again stripping off completely at the outset prevents this.
For me part of the excitement is the anticipation, the "will she won't she" moment. Clare Richards was the mistress of this (oh God I'm speaking of her in the past tense!).
Getting naked too readily and too often loses it for me. Lori is a case in point. Because you know she's pretty certain to go naked after a few seconds there's no excitement for me I'm afraid. Being naked all the time can also be restrictive - again, you know Lori is going to be forced to stay in one of a very few positions for often a very long time and there's very little variety as a result..
Hi Steve,you make a very good point,i myself agree with you,the teasing is the most erotic part for me as well,as you may have guessed my favourite is "FOXY" ON R.L.C. for me she is the best,she never goes naked,but will tease & take her panties down occasionally,as you say,its the anticipation that makes the show for me & "FOXY" For me does it everytime. She's on tonight,so i will be watching & enjoying,can't wait.
RE: To be naked or not naked? - Charlie Gordon Watson - 08-03-2013 12:46
(05-03-2013 01:16 )SteveHG Wrote: For me part of the excitement is the anticipation, the "will she won't she" moment.
The channels could make more of this but if they did people would complain if she didn't, if you see what I mean.
RE: To be naked or not naked? - RESPONSIBLE ADULT - 08-03-2013 16:59
Excuse me, but would someone please explain to me, and no doubt many more viewers. Why does the repeated expression of "performance of the models" keep being used? They plonk themselves in front of a camera and shake a phone in the air, and then fuck off home.
RE: To be naked or not naked? - The Silent Majority - 09-03-2013 08:09
^^^ You're idea of a 'performance' being swinging from the overhead lights naked, with a dildo stuck in every orifice, presumably.
RE: To be naked or not naked? - eccles - 09-03-2013 23:58
Difficult. Naked can offer a bit more flesh but movements are more restricted and caution can result in less flesh. Watching Lori with just her hand on her kebab is quite fun but here hand bigger than a thong. When a babes has a thongs on the camera can get up close a personal and show plucked chicken outer labia and pube stubble. Either way open leg is much more fun than side on coy poses.