+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Forum: Member Introductions & Personal Talk (/forumdisplay.php?fid=87)
+---- Forum: The Twilight Zone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=84)
+---- Thread: Fan Boys (/showthread.php?tid=65413)
RE: Fan Boys - HannahsPet - 03-07-2015 17:45
When you use the term this isnt a personal attack BUT your on a hiding to Nothing
RE: Fan Boys - Dt1 - 03-07-2015 17:50
My first post had a dig at rammy and i didn't get banned.
RE: Fan Boys - SecretAgent - 03-07-2015 17:55
(03-07-2015 17:50 )Dt1 Wrote: My first post had a dig at rammy and i didn't get banned.
Pretty feeble effort if you ask me.
RE: Fan Boys - M-L-L - 03-07-2015 18:02
Forum Debate Etiquette : How It works, Chapter One : ![[Image: image-C4CE_54C4074C.jpg]](https://www.tvgirlsgallery.co.uk/image-C4CE_54C4074C.jpg)
(03-07-2015 06:44 )The Silent Majority Wrote: .....everyone who criticises a babe, or a channel, is a Troll.
.....everyone who agrees with a babe, or a channel, is a Fanboy.
There is no middle ground, apparently......
RE: Fan Boys - Joey 27 - 03-07-2015 18:03
Well if he was going to attack any Fanboy it should have been me because i won the Fanboy of the year award last year not Rammy
RE: Fan Boys - munch1917 - 03-07-2015 18:06
(03-07-2015 17:34 )Scottishbloke Wrote: So perhaps a mod could set the record straight as to whether this member was banned for the above post or because he's been here before and formally caused trouble.
...
I think that newbies tend to get treated more strictly than say established posters but as I always say a newcomer
I don't see why anyone really needs to know exactly why the mods acted here, the guy came here, acted like a cunt, got banned, end of story, move along.
On the point of newbies being treated more strictly than old hands, I would have thought it the opposite way round, you give a newbie some leniency, and try to guide them to be a better contributor, whereas an old hand should really know better already.
That point then raises a question. As someone who has been vocal on the subject of people over-quoting in posts, I can't help wondering why you felt the need to quote the original post in yours. It added nothing, you could have raised your points perfectly adequately without the quote, and as mentioned, we know you hate over-quoting!
So, was there another agenda here? Was the quote just a veiled attempt to have your own pop at Rammy by repeating and perpetuating the original comments, safe behind the excuse, 'wot guv, me guv, no guv, i didn't mean nuffing guv, I was just repeating wot the other bloke said guv, honest guv'!
RE: Fan Boys - SecretAgent - 03-07-2015 18:07
(03-07-2015 18:03 )Joey 27 Wrote: Well if he was going to attack any Fanboy it should have been me because i won the Fanboy of the year award last year not Rammy
Oh here we go! An argument now about who should be picked upon and insulted
RE: Fan Boys - Whynot - 03-07-2015 18:08
I cannot stand fanboys... but then i hate the rest of you cunts too
RE: Fan Boys - Sm© - 03-07-2015 18:16
(03-07-2015 17:44 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: If the post was deemed unacceptable, it wouldn't still be there, must be more to it.
Simple really, the OP was banned by a mod who didn't have permission to edit or remove posts from the Chatbox centre. By the time a mod with permission logged on lots of replies had been made so it was all moved to the Twilight zone instead
RE: Fan Boys - M-L-L - 03-07-2015 18:27
(03-07-2015 18:07 )SecretAgent Wrote:(03-07-2015 18:03 )Joey 27 Wrote: Well if he was going to attack any Fanboy it should have been me because i won the Fanboy of the year award last year not Rammy
Oh here we go! An argument now about who should be picked upon and insulted
perhaps this year there should be an award for "Best Fanboy of Rammy" : his posts seem to be subjected to such a level of forensic debate and comment that I can only suspect that hundreds of years from now it will be a rich field for media studies scholars as they struggle to understand just how and why he attracted such eager examination of his every pronouncement from everybody else.