+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Forum: Member Introductions & Personal Talk (/forumdisplay.php?fid=87)
+---- Forum: The Twilight Zone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=84)
+---- Thread: The rudest daytime performance? (/showthread.php?tid=7903)
RE: The rudest daytime performance? - Sooky™ - 03-06-2009 01:02
Bell is a legend - I don't really know who the hell celeste is....kinda makes my point right there
and considering as any1 who knows me on here knows I know my babes/porn if she was that great I should know who she is lol
Just my opinion
RE: The rudest daytime performance? - DiduHearThat - 03-06-2009 06:40
StanTheMan Wrote:But Kelly Bell is not pleasant on the eye. I find those huge pumped up mounds of silicone she likes to call her breasts positively revolting. And anyway, this isn't a 'who do you find most attractive' question, I'm trying to ascertain who has given the rudest daytime performance and by no stretch of the imagination was KB's knickerless performance ruder that Celeste's!
shes not pleasant on the eye, your one of two things blind or just a dick i think ur both ,TAXI FOR STAN
RE: The rudest daytime performance? - StanTheMan - 03-06-2009 14:10
DiduHearThat Wrote:StanTheMan Wrote:But Kelly Bell is not pleasant on the eye. I find those huge pumped up mounds of silicone she likes to call her breasts positively revolting. And anyway, this isn't a 'who do you find most attractive' question, I'm trying to ascertain who has given the rudest daytime performance and by no stretch of the imagination was KB's knickerless performance ruder that Celeste's!
shes not pleasant on the eye, your one of two things blind or just a dick i think ur both ,TAXI FOR STAN
I'm neither. Bell isn't the least bit attractive IN MY OPINION!! She isn't pretty, has ridiculous looking 'breasts', and only moves when she picks her drink up from the floor. The majority of adults would not find Bell in the least bit attractive, of that I'm sure.
You really are unbelievable! Freedom of speech is alive and well... except here, obviously. I'm being attacked for having my own opinion?
There are many sad little fuckers on here, quickly closing ranks on anyone whose opinion doesn't match their own deluded ideas of what constitutes beauty.
RE: The rudest daytime performance? - Chilly - 03-06-2009 14:20
Errr...I think your little rant shows that freedom of speech on here does exist. You don't like Kelly, but other people do. You like to criticise Kelly, but other people like to stick up for Kelly.
At the end of the day, if your going to criticise someone, then you'd be very naive to think that you wouldn't get some back.
RE: The rudest daytime performance? - DiduHearThat - 03-06-2009 14:30
a simple shes not my type would have been enough but you went on to insult her thats why i called you a dick, theres ways of using your so called freedom of speech and going out of your way to upset a girl isn't one of them .
![[Image: 9np5tng0pmdxohf1dmth.jpg]](http://www.motor.com/images/9np5tng0pmdxohf1dmth.jpg)
RE: The rudest daytime performance? - StanTheMan - 03-06-2009 14:59
Okay.
Chilly, I felt my rant was wholly justified. If you look at the title of this thread (which I started) you will see that my intention was to get opinion on what others thought had been the rudest daytime show so far. I was NOT asking for opinions on attractiveness, but others quickly decided that this is what they'd do anyway. It wasn't me that turned this into a Bell Vs Celeste debate. I only started to give my opinions on Bell when others began to criticise me for saying I didn't find her attractive.
DiduHearThat, I don't know why you think I insulted her. Not finding someone attractive does not constitute an insult. But I'll repeat, this thread wasn't even supposed to be a debate about who is the more desirable. I'd have kept my opinions about Bell to myself if it hadn't been for others taking the thread in that direction.
RE: The rudest daytime performance? - rickhardo - 03-06-2009 15:03
I think calling a girl's breasts "revolting" probably qualifies as an insult to be fair Stan.
RE: The rudest daytime performance? - StanTheMan - 03-06-2009 15:09
rickhardo Wrote:I think calling a girl's breasts "revolting" probably qualifies as an insult to be fair Stan.
Okay, maybe, rickhardo, but I was trying to stress my point and was angered by the fact that others seemed so put out that I dared to have my own opinion.
Was calling for the vetting of future members (presumably to avoid anyone else with their own mind and independent thoughts getting in) and calling me a dick really necessary?
RE: The rudest daytime performance? - rickhardo - 03-06-2009 15:13
StanTheMan Wrote:rickhardo Wrote:I think calling a girl's breasts "revolting" probably qualifies as an insult to be fair Stan.
Okay, maybe, rickhardo, but I was trying to stress my point and was angered by the fact that others seemed so put out that I dared to have my own opinion.
Was calling for the vetting of future members (presumably to avoid anyone else with their own mind and independent thoughts getting in) and calling me a dick really necessary?
Probably not. I personally can't be bothered with the trading of insults which occasionally affects the forum, whoever I agree or disagree with - life's too short. All I'll say (and it's only a suggestion) is that there are better ways of making a point than resorting to name-calling and insults.
RE: The rudest daytime performance? - StanTheMan - 03-06-2009 15:19
rickhardo Wrote:StanTheMan Wrote:rickhardo Wrote:I think calling a girl's breasts "revolting" probably qualifies as an insult to be fair Stan.
Okay, maybe, rickhardo, but I was trying to stress my point and was angered by the fact that others seemed so put out that I dared to have my own opinion.
Was calling for the vetting of future members (presumably to avoid anyone else with their own mind and independent thoughts getting in) and calling me a dick really necessary?
Probably not. I personally can't be bothered with the trading of insults which occasionally affects the forum, whoever I agree or disagree with - life's too short. All I'll say (and it's only a suggestion) is that there are better ways of making a point than resorting to name-calling and insults.
Indeed! And at that - a very lonely, but mature, sensible and reasonable post in this thread - I think I'll leave it there.