+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Calling The Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=409)
+---- Thread: Mental Health of Callers (/showthread.php?tid=80491)
RE: Mental Health of Callers - Jamie's Knight - 04-03-2024 15:23
Some poor bastard seems to be spending a fortune on Cherry Leigh each night at the moment. How can they afford it and more to the point, how is it allowed?
RE: Mental Health of Callers - Tumble_Drier - 04-03-2024 16:30
We're about due for another Loughborough Kev type moment. It's been a while.
RE: Mental Health of Callers - crankshaft - 04-03-2024 17:43
Thanks for resurrecting this thread. I missed it first time round. Some solid observations made on here from the start onwards.
(On another subject, massive respect to Nadam who is no longer active on the forum and sadly, I see abruptly left the forum approx 3 years ago during Covid; I say sadly because I fear that possibly he may no longer be around. Impossible to really know.)
RE: Mental Health of Callers - ryuken - 06-03-2024 22:11
This is a really good idea for a thread and all the replies are great. I was addicted to the channels.
Sometimes I see and hear what punters write and say to babes, and think they're a couple sandwiches short of a picnic.
Spending thousands per week and/or hundreds of hours watching isn't healthy, just like gambling or drinking.
(22-03-2020 09:45 )Nadam Wrote: Do the channels and babes have a duty of care to callers and viewers? And are they meeting it?
Based on the amount of money and time some punters spend, then yes they should do. No they not meeting it.
If anything, the more out of touch a punter is with reality, the more a babe will pester them to spend money.
Even Mr P will act chummy with a punter in the chatbox, in an attempt to get them to spend money.
(22-03-2020 09:45 )Nadam Wrote: A couple of incidents yesterday made me think of this.
Watching Jamie Knight in the afternoon, somebody asked her if she thought of him being her boyfriend. Obviously not wanting to upset him she said yes. He then asked if she thought they'd last, to which she replied that she hadn't really thought about it.
I thought Jamie handled it quite well. Obviously she didn't want to upset the guy but didn't want to get his hopes up either. He was blurring the lines between fantasy and reality and it put her in a tricky situation.
Delusional fans would be better off spending their time and money on women in real life.
Escorts and strippers are everywhere, and are more than happy to fulfil all sexual fantasies.
But maybe they've tried that already and were unsuccessful, so the channels is their only outlet.
(22-03-2020 09:45 )Nadam Wrote: Later at night I was watching Valentina who I'm a big fan of. As soon as one username appeared she started having a go at him saying that he never tipped credits and never had any money. She was even typing to him when on a call. She also said she wouldn't speak to folk unles they had tipped/buzzed first and had some general rants about freeloaders and not getting her (admittedly fucking beautiful) pussy out for nothing. Eventually this bloke tipped her 10 credits because she basically guilt tripped him into it. I'm not sure how much that is in real money but it felt a bit like the guy was being bullied into handing over some cash.
Two different babes with two different approaches and Valentina often comes across as quite aggressive and grasping. Are the channels OK with this or should they be clamping down on such behaviour?
Speaking personally I'm happy to be a freeloader and haven't even called for years. If a stunner like Valentina gets her pussy out on the web and I get to see it then great. If she decides to go behind a pay wall then good luck to her.
I thought most punters knew that babes can see when they're watching and how much credits they've got.
If a punter has no intention of spending any money, then they should just watch for free without logging in.
Valentina is pretty but I'm not a fan of her "fiery Latina" personality. BS won't clamp down on it.
RE: Mental Health of Callers - Hobgoblin - 07-03-2024 21:57
(04-03-2024 15:23 )Jamies Knight Wrote: Some poor bastard seems to be spending a fortune on Cherry Leigh each night at the moment. How can they afford it and more to the point, how is it allowed?
Is he paying her to keep her top on?
RE: Mental Health of Callers - crankshaft - 07-03-2024 22:06
(07-03-2024 21:57 )Hobgoblin Wrote:(04-03-2024 15:23 )Jamies Knight Wrote: Some poor bastard seems to be spending a fortune on Cherry Leigh each night at the moment. How can they afford it and more to the point, how is it allowed?
Is he paying her to keep her top on?
RE: Mental Health of Callers - ukusagolf - 08-03-2024 02:20
(07-03-2024 21:57 )Hobgoblin Wrote:(04-03-2024 15:23 )Jamies Knight Wrote: Some poor bastard seems to be spending a fortune on Cherry Leigh each night at the moment. How can they afford it and more to the point, how is it allowed?
Is he paying her to keep her top on?
Sadly, some actually do
RE: Mental Health of Callers - Jamie's Knight - 08-03-2024 15:49
(07-03-2024 21:57 )Hobgoblin Wrote:(04-03-2024 15:23 )Jamies Knight Wrote: Some poor bastard seems to be spending a fortune on Cherry Leigh each night at the moment. How can they afford it and more to the point, how is it allowed?
I think Nadam is fine.
Is he paying her to keep her top on?
Probably!
RE: Mental Health of Callers - Tractor boy - 09-03-2024 01:15
We need Ray winstone or Harry Redknapp to front a " please wank responsibly " campaign.
RE: Mental Health of Callers - crankshaft - 09-03-2024 07:49
(09-03-2024 01:15 )Tractor boy Wrote: We need Ray winstone or Harry Redknapp to front a " please wank responsibly " campaign.
…or the dulcet tones of Joanna Lumley with her sensually soothing luxuriant and yet clinical patter (.. ooh, I think I’ve revealed abit of personal fantasy there
)