(22-05-2019 15:36 )Chrisst Wrote:  Who's this Houdini, sort of appeared from nowhere, I think she's webcam only, seems a bit hot.

(22-05-2019 17:05 )ShandyHand Wrote:  ^^^^Good post docutech. It always adds splendidly to the debate to hear a clear babes' perspective on things. Thank you for taking the time to illicit this for us.

I would only perhaps take issue with the pov in the last paragraph. Don't you think it'll be the market's influence that will ultimately decide what goes on on the web onlys, not the hesistant babes? I mean those that resist the requirements of their paying audience, and the vision the latter has for the format, longterm, will be left behind.

If I may say, it can feel as if some babes in recent times have grown too used to everything that they do on the shows being contained - either by TV regulations or by the protection offered in the seclusion of their paywall only fare. Guys will put up with the babes doing as they please for the latter (in what is seen as exclusively their own arena) but the web only shows are by their very nature quite a different beast. The sheer fta visibility, the transparency that offers, means there is a direct and open competition to contend with on the new form that was less sway on these other formats. (Competition was artifically suppressed by Ofcom's levellings on TV but that doesn't apply here.)

Your babes admit punter expectation is there. And it's not going away is it? It can be massaged but not eradicated. Only protectionist instruction from the operators and collaboration between babes might, for the time being, maintain a certain style of working on the web onlys. This will no doubt combat a drift to harder levels as dictated by this competition to some extent. But such unity has a habit of not holding fast for long. Unregulated I feel (and hope) that they'll will always be one or two ambitious babes looking to do more, give a better level of service to both cameras, in order to get ahead.

So... the drift to somewhat harder levels may be slower than punters would like and sporadic - held back completely at times no doubt... it may not go far enough for some punter's liking... but the drift will be there all the same. 

I feel the market will have a bigger hand in deciding what levels are successful on the web onlys than these babe's foresee. That is a freedom the punter gets when there is no government backed interference in a platform (at least as far as allowable content goes). If guys think the format is beholden of a better service, better levels of performance, than is being offered they are right to keep asking for it. This time, there is nothing external in the way.

(29-05-2019 10:21 )Robot Devil Wrote:  Does 66 actually have a guide anywhere that explicitly states who is going to be doing the web-only shows that particular day?

(29-05-2019 10:21 )Robot Devil Wrote:  Does 66 actually have a guide anywhere that explicitly states who is going to be doing the web-only shows that particular day?