(01-06-2019 13:51 )icy12 Wrote:  Another recycled 'Babe' in Kaitlin Laken on this afternoon.

Surely, there are better options?

(01-06-2019 22:11 )docutech Wrote:  

(29-05-2019 10:21 )Robot Devil Wrote:  Does 66 actually have a guide anywhere that explicitly states who is going to be doing the web-only shows that particular day?

I think many babes are told their shifts are web based unless circumstances dictate otherwise on the day, though those who historically obtain higher TV minutes from calls will get a higher percentage of TV shifts planned, there is also a growing use of splitting a shift TV and web some keeping both mediums and user groups happy.

(02-06-2019 17:11 )Chrisst Wrote:  

(01-06-2019 22:11 )docutech Wrote:  

(29-05-2019 10:21 )Robot Devil Wrote:  Does 66 actually have a guide anywhere that explicitly states who is going to be doing the web-only shows that particular day?

I think many babes are told their shifts are web based unless circumstances dictate otherwise on the day, though those who historically obtain higher TV minutes from calls will get a higher percentage of TV shifts planned, there is also a growing use of splitting a shift TV and web some keeping both mediums and user groups happy.

Would it also be the case that it makes Ofcom's job harder too because they have to work out whether such and such a slip was on TV or not.

(02-06-2019 20:31 )docutech Wrote:  

(02-06-2019 17:11 )Chrisst Wrote:  

(01-06-2019 22:11 )docutech Wrote:  

(29-05-2019 10:21 )Robot Devil Wrote:  Does 66 actually have a guide anywhere that explicitly states who is going to be doing the web-only shows that particular day?

I think many babes are told their shifts are web based unless circumstances dictate otherwise on the day, though those who historically obtain higher TV minutes from calls will get a higher percentage of TV shifts planned, there is also a growing use of splitting a shift TV and web some keeping both mediums and user groups happy.

Would it also be the case that it makes Ofcom's job harder too because they have to work out whether such and such a slip was on TV or not.

lol maybe.... but I think your looking too deep into it ...web stream use is just taking over from a reduction in TV channels simple as that ...in my opinion ...

(02-06-2019 20:31 )docutech Wrote:  ...web stream use is just taking over from a reduction in TV channels simple as that ...in my opinion ...

(21-05-2019 15:52 )docutech Wrote:  ... Having spoken to numerous girls about it I know one of the issues with web is losing too many callers from TV ...

(21-05-2019 15:52 )docutech Wrote:  ... I know they enjoy the freedom web brings and the opportunity to wear more risque outfits but they will not raise there levels ...

(03-06-2019 07:05 )ShandyHand Wrote:  

(02-06-2019 20:31 )docutech Wrote:  ...web stream use is just taking over from a reduction in TV channels simple as that ...in my opinion ...

With respect, have you considered why you are being fed the 'calm down, accept what you're given' message you've been relaying in your recent posts on this subject? 

Yes 66 are clearly in need of extra capacity but there is so much more than that going on here. The babes are clearly exploiting some of the advantages about being an online exclusive, the point is that too often it is only the elements that suit them. If you look at the history of the shows in recent years this has been an all too frequently trend: The shows and the babes forge ideas or formats but implement them in ways designed to suit their needs, and/or protect existing revenue streams, over providing a service that guys are actually looking for.  

Why do the 66 babes show no signs of encouraging any kind of organised tip-based model for the web onlys for instance?

(21-05-2019 15:52 )docutech Wrote:  ... Having spoken to numerous girls about it I know one of the issues with web is losing too many callers from TV ...

Have you thought that this might be because they have taken a look and seen that it only limits the things that they bought into the shows in the first place for? That there is too much just trying to sell them additional things while limiting their fta view of the babe? Too much dismantling of what they have on TV in order to feed the babes ideas of what the new format is, instead of providing enough genuine advantages to switch for the money they are already paying.

In these days when a web stream can be run on a regular TV with relative ease, that any caller would rather stick to Ofcomed TV than partake in the supposed advantages on an online babe is actually a pretty damning indictment on the service currently being offered online.

(21-05-2019 15:52 )docutech Wrote:  ... I know they enjoy the freedom web brings and the opportunity to wear more risque outfits but they will not raise there levels ...

This is something of a common misconception of the argument in my view. The only levels some of us are expectant of being raised are those of performance and tease to main cam. This is not about wanting free skin, it's about what the service being paid for should look like to the big feed.

(03-06-2019 23:03 )geoffh Wrote:  The expectation will always be there even if all channels go web only due to the fact people remember what used to go on at the channels and as you say everyone has their levels but so does the viewer....... the women euither embrace it or find a different career path that does not involve glamour modelling