Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 03-12-2013 19:38 ^ Babestar was definitely the 'Radio Caroline' of the babe channels! It had that renegade feel to it. I also liked the music and the simple but striking chromakey backgrounds. Tammy Oldham flashing her pussy every five minutes was good too. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 03-12-2013 20:09 Tammy Oldhams pussy was very hairy if I remember too Dave Maybe it was her offensive bush that got the channel shut down RE: Ofcom Discussion - RatedR - 05-12-2013 18:25 This is one of those times when I think 'why can't people just think things to themselves instead of posting them' not specifically the one post, but any discussion on moments like this. Everyone thinks it, but it makes it easy now for anyone who likes to 'cause trouble'. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 05-12-2013 20:12 Yes just to back up the sentiments, I cannot stress this highly enough, if you see something that was well how should I put it, not exactly following the strict set of rules and codes of conduct as set by those tossers at ofcom HQ then say nothing. As a capper I'm always very aware of that fact so I try to make sure that any caps I post are not potentially going to land any of the channels in hot water. Moving on, a lot of us like to whinge that Johnny fucking foreigner always seems to get the better deal when it comes to the babe channels. I would like to tell you that's really not strictly true. The past few nights I've been checking out the eurotic TV webstream, a channel which can also be viewed here in the UK if you were to stick up a satellite and point in either in the direction of Astra 1 or Hotbird. Have a look at the shit they aired last night at the back of 1am and you'll probably see what I mean. Not exactly what I'd call erotic and is the same shit that airs on that channel most nights now RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 05-12-2013 20:56 Thanks SB. Regarding the European babe channels, have they all cut back on the nudity (especially full frontal) or is it just Eurotic TV? RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 05-12-2013 21:16 With regards to eurotic tv that channel has been blowing hot and cold for years, it seems to go from broadcasting scrapping the bottom of the barrel material to top notch shows in a matter of weeks. With regards to that channel the golden age is well gone, new censorship rules hit that channel back at the start of 2009. Previously it was allowed to broadcast uncensored shows 24/7 since the birth of the channel back in 2004. Now it is only allowed to broadcast night material from the hours of 10PM to 3AM UK time or 11PM to 4AM depending on what time your GMT clock is set at as it varies throughout Europe. So only 5 hours, even on a good night these days the content is barely all that stronger than what you'd see on Babestation. As for the other European channels, they also have Babestation24 which despite the fact they have a German Licence is still tamer than the version we have here in the UK much to to the frustration of Johnny foreigner and co. Lastly they have Sexysat TV which again seems to blow hot and cold and is the hardest show currently available in Europe. The problem with that channel is that it's not sexy in the least, the picture quality is terrible, a bit like looking through a shit stained glass window. All I can say is that these days the European shows are no better than the ones we have here in the UK so somebody must be censoring them RE: Ofcom Discussion - Bandwagon - 05-12-2013 22:05 Ok, point taken, newbee mistake ;-) RE: Ofcom Discussion - SCIROCCO - 06-12-2013 17:25 Last few nights on UK channels have been shockingly tame. Is somebody at OFCON taking a closer look? Thing is there is nothing offensive with models who do HC playing safe with 2 pairs of knickers and camera men who are Tom Daley admirers.. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Bandwagon - 07-12-2013 10:14 They are restricting a service that should be readily available in my opinion. Many studies have shown the connection between states that have legalised porn and lower rape stats. It's an old debate thats been covered many times but the idea being that it gives people a chance to deal with their deviant sexual desires through masterbation, instead of releasing their urges through rape. Some say it creates ideas in mens heads and can lead to sexual violence. I say that's garbage because we don't go around killing people after watching a horror movie or shooting people after watching a shoot em up. There will always be nutters in every walk of life that corrupt the stats but overall i think the proof is there, although I must point out it has also been said, it is virtually impossible to prove that porn definitely reduces sexual crimes, but it would certainly look that way from what I have read on the subject. We are heading the wrong way in this country I'm afraid. We need change and the horizon looks grim. RE: Ofcom Discussion - RatedR - 07-12-2013 13:47 I couldn't care about hardcore and it's availability on TV etc. But letting a babe touch herself if she wants to while having phone sex on dedicated TV channels, is no more offensive or damaging than a babe having phone sex and not touching herself. The same with girl girl contact while having phone sex. It's never really been graphic. The odd time something worthy of a fine has happened, but the rules seem to be in place for the soul reason of fine collecting. After one mistake has been made, the rules are tightened to make sure a lesser incident is then worthy of a fine. |