+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255)
+----- Forum: Former Studio 66 babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=311)
+------ Forum: Sophia Knight (/forumdisplay.php?fid=181)
+------ Thread: Sophia Knight "Ultimate Nightshow Babe 2011" - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=17444)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439
RE: Sophia Knight "Ultimate Nightshow Babe 2011" - Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 18-05-2012 00:07
(17-05-2012 23:39 )The Robot Devil Wrote:(17-05-2012 23:34 )mrmann Wrote: Umm, yes, I do consider them to be sluts. Isn't that common sense??? You shag for cash with many people, be it on or off screen = slut. Sorry to inform you. Maybe I have a different view than you do.
I already gave examples in my above post.
So why wouldn't she be a 'slut' if she fucks women on camera ? Double standards much ?
Not to me. Women have vaginas, whereas men have erect penises which thrust into women and spray semen all over them and which can impregnate them etc. Get the picture? If someone told me "I wouldn't sleep with her, she's a slut", the first thing I'd picture is her having banged lots of men, not women, and I think most men would be thinking the same thing.
I don't get what's confusing about this.
Do you think men would be more comfortable knowing that she' fooled around with many women, or do you think they'd feel more comfortable knowing she's been penetrated and sprayed on by man men? I think the answer is an easy one.
RE: Sophia Knight "Ultimate Nightshow Babe 2011" - Chat & Discussion - iloveMegan - 18-05-2012 00:48
(18-05-2012 00:07 )mrmann Wrote: Do you think men would be more comfortable knowing that she' fooled around with many women, or do you think they'd feel more comfortable knowing she's been penetrated and sprayed on by man men? I think the answer is an easy one.
I don't see what difference it makes if she's been with x amount of men or women while shooting porn, as performers are regularly tested. Quite frankly knowing she's been "sprayed on by man men" (seriously, how old are you?) would probably be a positive for most guys as they would know she's a dirty bitch
RE: Sophia Knight "Ultimate Nightshow Babe 2011" - Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 18-05-2012 02:26
(18-05-2012 00:48 )iloveMegan Wrote:(18-05-2012 00:07 )mrmann Wrote: Do you think men would be more comfortable knowing that she' fooled around with many women, or do you think they'd feel more comfortable knowing she's been penetrated and sprayed on by man men? I think the answer is an easy one.
I don't see what difference it makes if she's been with x amount of men or women while shooting porn, as performers are regularly tested. Quite frankly knowing she's been "sprayed on by man men" (seriously, how old are you?) would probably be a positive for most guys as they would know she's a dirty bitch
I'm writing in this way to try to get through to you. Being crass was the only option I thought would work, since you have a hard time understanding what I'm trying to say.
Not once did I mention anything to do with STD's. The simple fact that women are penetrated by men and likely ejaculated on, does not sit as well with me as if the women had been with other women only, on screen that is. I'm not a big B/G porn guy, despite enjoying some of the more suggestive POVs.
It doesn't matter if porn stars are clean, it's still nasty to know they've had many men "go" inside of them or on them, which they do quite frequently in porn! Now, our girlfriends have probably experienced some of this as well, but they aren't exactly showing it for the whole world to see, right? They've also hopefully been more likely to wear a condom, if they were in a relationship and trusted the person, and just never got around to getting mutual STD tests. Like I said, it's not just regarding STD's (Escorts it would be, as there aren't restrictions for customers. Some go bareback, or do other things that are still risky), but about having men inside of them and semen all over them which can quickly cheapen any star power certain women have, because to me B/G sex should be more of a special thing than to just do with tons of people on camera. Sophia still can hold the trump card!
If Sophia went the B/G route (With many men), then that's fine, but I think it's a bad choice and will degrade her more than if she's with a woman (Not getting penetrated or ejaculated on incase you didn't get in the first few times). If she only does it with her boyfriend, then it won't be as "slutty", because it's her boyfried, as oppose to her shagging many men in different movies. If she's well known for shagging lots of men on film and isn't in a relationship, then do you think she has a better chance of finding true love or a really good boyfriend? I don't. It's possible, but I think it will be harder to find a good, decent man who will want to be with her, if he knows she's a porn star or has been with tons of people. It can affect that aspect of her life as well.
That's pretty damn easy to understand, so if you can't get how I feel on the issue, then I think you might be trying to rile me up for some reason. Yes, being a porn star means you are a slut, to me at least, as well as if you are an escort. It's hard to decide what fits the term "slut" the best, because some women have been with three men, or five or six or whatever, and I wouldn't call a woman that if she'd been in a relationship with a few men, or even if she had a one night stand. When I know women are shagging multiple people out of habit, or as a porn star or escort, then I feel as if the term "Slut" is fitting.
RE: Sophia Knight "Ultimate Nightshow Babe 2011" - Chat & Discussion - dan g 27 - 18-05-2012 12:42
Quote:It doesn't matter if porn stars are clean, it's still nasty to know they've had many men "go" inside of them or on them, which they do quite frequently in porn!But in fairness to use your words a lot of women can go inside other women if they use a strapon
RE: Sophia Knight "Ultimate Nightshow Babe 2011" - Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 18-05-2012 12:52
(18-05-2012 12:42 )dan g 27 Wrote:Quote:It doesn't matter if porn stars are clean, it's still nasty to know they've had many men "go" inside of them or on them, which they do quite frequently in porn!But in fairness to use your words a lot of women can go inside other women if they use a strapon
No offense but
A strapon is a toy, not a real human body part. It's not a penis. In porn with many men she'll be having them penetrate her without condoms. Big difference than having a woman put some plastic toy into her.
My long message should have been enough. That's all from me. Now the ones who want to see her with semen all over her face and being done anally or shagged by many different people can respond with their usual comments
RE: Sophia Knight "Ultimate Nightshow Babe 2011" - Chat & Discussion - ricky_s - 18-05-2012 13:41
mrmann - I like Robert De Niro. I love Casino, Goodfellas and The Deer Hunter. I don't like the Fockers movies so I have never watched them. I have that choice. No one forces you to watch anything. Just don't watch Sophia in b/g movies if you have a problem with it. But don't come on here and preach like you're Mother Teresa. What gives you the right to label anyone a slut? You got a problem - fine just don't watch. But what gives you the right to judge anybody?
RE: Sophia Knight "Ultimate Nightshow Babe 2011" - Chat & Discussion - Gaz "AV1" Aston - 18-05-2012 16:46
Mr Mann has called Sophia a Slut numerous times (or at least intimated that a move to hardcore would mean she was one) but still his posts remain....
My view on Sophia doing Hardcore BG stuff... If she wants to do it and is happy who are any of us to judge her for making that decision? If she does, she wont be tainted in my eyes..If you live life thinking you wont like a girl anymore because of the amount of cock she has had/ may have had then really why would you bother to watch ANY porn at all? Needless to say you probably wont get laid either let alone fall in love because all that will be nagging you at the back of your mind is ..How many cocks has she had???
For what its worth Sophia, i really want to see what you're made of in the sack, no amount of G/G porn is going to tell me that and as i'm married its not very likely to happen in real life so seeing someone else do it with you will be the closest i can imagine me getting
...So do it.....If you want to of course 
RE: Sophia Knight "Ultimate Nightshow Babe 2011" - Chat & Discussion - sophia knight - 18-05-2012 17:01
Hey,
I dont like it when you guys fight...
so just to clear this up... I will NEVER do B/G porn as in being booked to perform with different male talent, BUT..... a scene maybe it be POV or a full sex scene with my Boyfriend is something we have talked about doing, but only for my website and if this is to happen it wont be anytime soon. sorry to ruin anyone's fantasies if you do want me to do B/G but i dont like seeing you fighting between each other over something thats NEvER gonna happen. shooting a scene with Daisy Lynn and Breanne Benson tongiht!! EXCITED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RE: Sophia Knight "Ultimate Nightshow Babe 2011" - Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 18-05-2012 17:01
Not friends anymore Gaz? A shame
I think the mods and admin understand my comments about Sophia doing B/G porn (With different men), even if you have a hard time understanding.
The member above you is clearly missing my point, so he should read my post again.
Thanks for commenting Sophia! I think you are making a wise choice!
RE: Sophia Knight "Ultimate Nightshow Babe 2011" - Chat & Discussion - Gaz "AV1" Aston - 18-05-2012 17:10
(18-05-2012 17:01 )mrmann Wrote: Not friends anymore Gaz? A shame
^^ As ive said before mrmann, i will judge a person by what they post, im not just blindly going to agree with someone's standpoint regardless of what they say because i "get on with them".. I call em how i see em!
Sophia, i knew that if ever you were going to go the HC route that it would be with your B/F and my opinion remains the same...i'd still like to see that too