+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - jimmyt73 - 16-01-2014 21:03
I think this latest ruling is another example of over zealous regulation by an out of touch regulator,i mean its not as if the celebrities set out to expose themselves on national mainstream tv,i cant understand why Ofcom cant grasp the concept that sometimes wardrobe malfunctions will happen,where will all this end,will soaps no longer be allowed to film characters on holiday,will dresses be banned on Strictly in favour of trousers,some of the Australian soaps will have to go if bikinis are now banned,
RE: Ofcom Discussion - hatessexistofcom - 16-01-2014 21:52
(16-01-2014 18:29 )SCIROCCO Wrote: I am morally outraged by that pure hardcore filth performace. Er no actually.
No bikinis on women so no Speedos on the men aswell? Bet you not.
I will stick in a complaint if this happens..Double standards if men still in speedos ,,mind you Ofcom love penis shots.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - M-L-L - 16-01-2014 22:11
(16-01-2014 21:03 )jimmyt73 Wrote: where will all this end,will soaps no longer be allowed to film characters on holiday....some of the Australian soaps will have to go if bikinis are now banned,
not unless the soaps go out live surely ? I think "wardrobe malfunctions" would the least of their worries if that was the case : they'd have enough "gaffes" material for a non-stop 24 hours a day rolling "Alright on the Night" style series. 
(That might almost make them worth watching !)
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Rammyrascal - 17-01-2014 00:31
(16-01-2014 20:33 )JuanKerr Wrote:(16-01-2014 20:03 )Rammyrascal Wrote: I can see why Ofcom have made this decision and no real complaints from me about it. yeah, splash does go out live and there have been a few wardrobe malfunctions in the past. so I can see why Ofcom are not allowing bikinis on splash anymore, to try and eliminate or minimse any chances of future wardrobe malfunctions happening
I'm going to presume you're not trolling and therefore ask you to explain what terrible things might happen to the world if a woman was to accidentally flash a boob in this programme.
A standpoint such as this, from a regular viewer of adult babeshows, seems very odd to me.
yes I can see why what I said earlier is odd but im not trolling. as for what terrible things would happen if a boob was flashed accidentally. nothing terrible at all. would just be loads of complaints to Ofcom and hysteria in the press and on the net, leading to an investigation and itv would get a sanction/punishment of some sort.
so perhaps to be on the safe side to avoid all the above therefore Ofcom made the decision not to have bikinis worn on splash to minimise the chances of a wardrobe malfunction
RE: Ofcom Discussion - hatessexistofcom - 17-01-2014 01:59
Channel 4 with its what happened in Kavos or this Sunny Beach and the rest still showing penises but blurring female genitals...We still cannot get valid answer whether this highly sexist,highly offensive,double standards act is Ofcom or channel 4..Channel 5 emailed saying we can show male genitals but not female in same documentary cause it would break Ofcom rules...Ofcom wrote to me sent recorded delivery that the showing of male or female genitals would not usually warrant investigation by us,.
Really need to get this sorted I saw my arse since 1996 about and its getting worse..At least more folk are tweeting about this blurring and its mainly women complaining that the disgusting nobs should be blurred out not fannys..
Oh next week the are showing naked rambler bbc1 I bet they don't blur out his genitals..So love to really assault the idiots at channels or Ofcom or the documentary makers themselves,,WHO IS AT FAULT? A MAN IS BORN WITH THE MOST GENITALS ON SHOW WHEREAS WOMENS ARE MAINLY INTERNAL YET THEY BLUR OUT FEMALES FOR NO VALID REASON..THEY SHOW ALL THE PENIS EVEN ERECTIONS AND FORESKIN RETRACTED AND TESTICLES YET CENSOR FEMALES WITH ABSOLUTE NO REASON.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - munch1917 - 17-01-2014 05:37
(17-01-2014 00:31 )Rammyrascal Wrote: ...
so perhaps to be on the safe side to avoid all the above therefore Ofcom made the decision not to have bikinis worn on splash to minimise the chances of a wardrobe malfunction
Just to clarify, as far as I know, Ofcom have no direct involvement in this decision, it was the programme producers.
Personally, I very much doubt even a brief flash of nipple would warrant any sanctions from Ofcom, perhaps a verbal warning at most, but given what the main channels get away with normally, I think they would be safe. More likely the decision was taken for commercial reasons to avoid any unwanted negative publicity for what is suppossed to be a wholesome family entertainment show.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - SCIROCCO - 17-01-2014 08:07
I can hear a classic Roy Orbison tune coming on....."Just running scared.....".
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Tonywa - 17-01-2014 09:37
(16-01-2014 20:33 )JuanKerr Wrote:(16-01-2014 20:03 )Rammyrascal Wrote: I can see why Ofcom have made this decision and no real complaints from me about it. yeah, splash does go out live and there have been a few wardrobe malfunctions in the past. so I can see why Ofcom are not allowing bikinis on splash anymore, to try and eliminate or minimse any chances of future wardrobe malfunctions happening
I'm going to presume you're not trolling and therefore ask you to explain what terrible things might happen to the world if a woman was to accidentally flash a boob in this programme.
A standpoint such as this, from a regular viewer of adult babeshows, seems very odd to me.
It would come as a terrible shock to the millions watching who had no idea that woman have breasts and in all probability bring an end to Western civilisation as we know it.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - XTC - 17-01-2014 13:52
(17-01-2014 01:59 )hatessexistofcom Wrote: Channel 4 with its what happened in Kavos or this Sunny Beach and the rest still showing penises but blurring female genitals...We still cannot get valid answer whether this highly sexist,highly offensive,double standards act is Ofcom or channel 4..Channel 5 emailed saying we can show male genitals but not female in same documentary cause it would break Ofcom rules...Ofcom wrote to me sent recorded delivery that the showing of male or female genitals would not usually warrant investigation by us,.Can't believe you posted the same thing I just have. My post was in the other thread on here about Ofcom/mainstream TV nudity.
Really need to get this sorted I saw my arse since 1996 about and its getting worse..At least more folk are tweeting about this blurring and its mainly women complaining that the disgusting nobs should be blurred out not fannys..
Oh next week the are showing naked rambler bbc1 I bet they don't blur out his genitals..So love to really assault the idiots at channels or Ofcom or the documentary makers themselves,,WHO IS AT FAULT? A MAN IS BORN WITH THE MOST GENITALS ON SHOW WHEREAS WOMENS ARE MAINLY INTERNAL YET THEY BLUR OUT FEMALES FOR NO VALID REASON..THEY SHOW ALL THE PENIS EVEN ERECTIONS AND FORESKIN RETRACTED AND TESTICLES YET CENSOR FEMALES WITH ABSOLUTE NO REASON.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - hatessexistofcom - 17-01-2014 18:07
(17-01-2014 13:52 )XTC Wrote: Can't believe you posted the same thing I just have. My post was in the other thread on here about Ofcom/mainstream TV nudity.
If you were in front of me I would shake your hand and buy you 10 pints..Ive now left a comment in other section but cheers for TRUE FULLY VALID comment on sexist double standards on UK tv ..
DVD'S also seem to lack female genital;s yet loads of films at 15 cert with penises in..