The UK Babe Channels Forum
Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)



RE: Ofcom Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 17-01-2014 20:02

This is taking it a bit far....

[Image: image-21FB_52D98BC6.jpg]

laugh


RE: Ofcom Discussion - M-L-L - 17-01-2014 20:07

^^^^ Yeah, EPGs running scared, seen that before. It's also one of the many reasons why there are no programmes with "Scunthorpe" in the title ?laugh


RE: Ofcom Discussion - XTC - 17-01-2014 23:41

(17-01-2014 18:07 )hatessexistofcom Wrote:  If you were in front of me I would shake your hand and buy you 10 pints..Ive now left a comment in other section but cheers for TRUE FULLY VALID comment on sexist double standards on UK tv ..

DVD'S also seem to lack female genital;s yet loads of films at 15 cert with penises in..

Yes lots of 15 certificate movies show penises and testicles in very "distasteful" shots, including zoomed in shots. Yet Labia can't even be shown "tastefully" in an 18 certificate movie. It's sad times we live in. I think the real worry is for young girls wondering what normal vaginas look like and young boys curious about sex. I'd hate to think young girls are considering labiaplasty because they don't believe they're normal. Or young boys having to search for explicit porn to find out what a vagina looks like.


RE: Ofcom Discussion - JuanKerr - 19-01-2014 13:06

As a slight aside to normal discussions here, can anyone explain to me how certain channels (given that they are required to notify viewers during the day that "This is a NON-adult service") get away with plastering text services all over the screen that offer such things as "Vids that are too hot for TV" ??


RE: Ofcom Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 19-01-2014 15:07

It's up to your own dirty mind how you interpret the word 'HOT' in this context. It could just mean up-to-the-minute Wink

Or at least, that's what they can tell the judge.


RE: Ofcom Discussion - Fernandez Esperenda - 19-01-2014 20:19

(17-01-2014 20:02 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:  This is taking it a bit far....

[Image: image-21FB_52D98BC6.jpg]

laugh

Big Laugh that is fucking pathetic, what is wrong with the people running your country?


RE: Ofcom Discussion - admiral decker - 19-01-2014 20:45

(19-01-2014 20:19 )Fernandez Esperenda Wrote:  Big Laugh that is fucking pathetic, what is wrong with the people running your country?

That image was taken from Virgin TV. It may surprise you to be told this, but Virgin Media do not run the country.


RE: Ofcom Discussion - SCIROCCO - 20-01-2014 08:05

We have a Beaver Road in our city.....wonder if that will be censored soon? Or perhaps Great Bell End and Great Cock Up in the Lake District?


RE: Ofcom Discussion - Fernandez Esperenda - 20-01-2014 13:31

(19-01-2014 20:45 )admiral decker Wrote:  
(19-01-2014 20:19 )Fernandez Esperenda Wrote:  Big Laugh that is fucking pathetic, what is wrong with the people running your country?

That image was taken from Virgin TV. It may surprise you to be told this, but Virgin Media do not run the country.

There must be a reason why they would censor Arsenal.... Its because your country is turning into a dictatorship...


RE: Ofcom Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 20-01-2014 13:57

(20-01-2014 13:31 )Fernandez Esperenda Wrote:  There must be a reason why they would censor Arsenal.... Its because your country is turning into a dictatorship...

Don't you mean a d***tatorship ? Wink