+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 13-02-2014 18:13
As I've said before and I don't want to be too crude about this either but the reason the likes of ITV and other channels get away with just a slap on the wrist despite consistently breaking rules is because they ain't nobody at home getting off on it as to say. Spanking the monkey, bashing the bishop, choking the chicken, whatever you want to call it
The 900+ channels were set up and set up for one reason alone, as harsh as the censors are on them the babe channels have never been able to truly justify their content whether it be educational or otherwise. In this stiffer up Britain the idea of the powers that be accepting this material without even battering an eyelid is not going to happen overnight.
As they say. No thanks - no sex - we're British unlike these dirty Johnny Foreigners who should know better. Funny then why when it comes to Prague and Amsterdam that the majority of those visiting just so happen to be from the UK
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Block - 16-02-2014 07:41
How do i file a complaint to offcom?
I want to complain that there aren't enough tits and ass on TV.
Maybe if more people complained off this it would counteract the dickheads complaining about ( oh NO I just saw a nipple OMG the world will end!).
RE: Ofcom Discussion - RatedR - 16-02-2014 13:55
Scottish, I'm not sure the problem is solely the content and fact people watch for pleasure. Ofcom aren't fond of the channels because they make money by targeting a group of people.
My response to that though: people are happy to call, it's a choice, so butt out Ofcom, people are capable of deciding whether to spend their money or not.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - percpint - 16-02-2014 22:38
Why cant ofcom be as diligent in the other areas it regulates as it is with the adult channels? I am sick of junk calls both on my land line and mobile numbers. I am ex-directory and registered withTPS and am still bombarded with calls about claiming for claiming for my car accident ( which I've never had ) or to reclaim PPI ( which again I've never had, always declined it ) etc. I detest cold calling on my phones, which i regard as an invasion of my time and privacy. What does of com do? Prevaricates then nothing!!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Bandwagon - 16-02-2014 22:39
Whatever their reasons, who the hell are they to fuck up my TV viewing on a night time?
Why are they so lame as to restrict the things they have? This country is bonkers I tell you.
We have people on TV chatting shit about how the Russians shouldn't live in the dark ages towards homosexuality, like we're all hip and living in the modern society ourselves when in fact we're miles behind the times with general sexuality itself.
It's a fucking joke.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - poo - 17-02-2014 13:52
Get Lucky TV (channel 908), Lucky Star (channel 909), Party (Freeview channel 175) all get a telling off by evil Ofcom.
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/obb248/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=tweet&utm_campaign=bb248
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 17-02-2014 14:56
They're very lucky they weren't fined.
Once again, management stupidity at the babe channels is to blame. The rule about not advertising on screen any websites which have R18 content is crystal clear, yet the Babestation channels had the R18-rated babestation.com site advertised for days. Apparently nobody noticed.
Studio 66 got done for this as well last year.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 24-02-2014 22:29
I'm quite surprised that nobody on this forum has mentioned this yet but recently BBC3 aired a documentry about webcam girls and many of them featured you will easily recognise, Oliva who appears on RLC is featured quite a bit
Hopefully this documentary has spread more openness when it comes to the babe channels and those who regularly feature on it.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03w2w8t/The_Truth_about_Webcam_Girls/
RE: Ofcom Discussion - terence - 24-02-2014 22:34
^^^^ http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=59176
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 27-02-2014 11:36
(17-02-2014 13:52 )poo Wrote: Get Lucky TV (channel 908), Lucky Star (channel 909), Party (Freeview channel 175) all get a telling off by evil Ofcom.
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/obb248/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=tweet&utm_campaign=bb248
(17-02-2014 14:56 )Digital Dave Wrote: They're very lucky they weren't fined.
Once again, management stupidity at the babe channels is to blame. The rule about not advertising on screen any websites which have R18 content is crystal clear, yet the Babestation channels had the R18-rated babestation.com site advertised for days. Apparently nobody noticed.
Studio 66 got done for this as well last year.
What this Ofcom Bulletin and in breach ruling proves without doubt is which channels that broadcast BS programs have or don't have a Dutch licence, all the channels that BS uses to broadcast BS programs all showed the same website address that leads to R18 content, on freeview only Party Ch 175 was found in breach, so that's the only channel on freeview with a Ofcom licence, freeview channels 172, 173 and 174 are all Dutch regulated, so Ofcom couldn't find them in breach of their licence conditions, this also backs up what Tiffany said a while back about having a new licence when she was speaking on Freview Ch 172, that channel used to have a Ofcom licence .
Freeview Ch 173 that broadcasts the BS Xtra program shows the same feed has the Sky channel that broadcast BS Xtra, but only the Sky Ofcom regulated channel was found in breach due to it having a Ofcom licence and the freeview channel being Dutch regulated wasn't .
As we know only Sky Channel 906 has a Dutch licence and that's why it wasn't found in breach and the other 2 were .