+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - rolf pliao - 02-04-2014 22:11
Look at the bottom for a possible explanation of previous attitudes
![[Image: xd56.jpg]](http://imageshack.com/a/img843/4348/xd56.jpg)
RE: Ofcom Discussion - SCIROCCO - 03-04-2014 07:03
I am under the impression somebody is about to get fined as all the channels are playing it ultra safe at present. More double knickers than I have seen in many a month. As for the Gay Marriage thing it is fine for a couple of men or women to be seen kissing on BBC or SKY at lunchtime so why not on an adult show at say 1130pm?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - benrichards7 - 03-04-2014 16:38
if a channel is going to be fined, how would all the channels know about it?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 03-04-2014 18:26
As far as i know the only babe channel currently under investigation that could possibly be getting a fine is Studio 66, Ofcom launched this investigation way back in February and mentioned it in broadcast bulletin issue number 247 and dated the 3/2/2014 . This investigation is still ongoing i believe, no other babe channels are currently being investigated
The last babe channel to be found in breach was BS, back in February and that wasn't for anything the girls did, it was for advertising the BS website on screen that broadcasts unencrypted non age verified R18 content .
The last Ofcom broadcast bulletin came out a few days ago on the 31/3/2014, the babe channels don't get a mention at all, non were found in breach or new investigations launched, unless iv'e missed one i don't think any complaints were made to Ofcom at all concerning the babe channels, not even the ones that Ofcom asses but don't investigate .
The previous broadcast bulletin came out on the 17/3/2014, no babe channels were found in breach or new in investigations launched in that bulletin either, Studio 66 gets a mention when some one made a complaint concerning "scheduling" according to Ofcom, Ofcom didn't bother to investigate this complaint, it would surprise me if someone complained Studio 66 were still showing day shows after 9pm
.This is the link to the latest and past Ofcom Bulletins concerning complaints, new investigations and in breach rulings etc .
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/
RE: Ofcom Discussion - SCIROCCO - 03-04-2014 19:36
So if nobody is being investigated why such risk averse output? Surely the producers aren't all wimps with a puritanical upbringing? The last slip I saw was on the Sochi ice rink...
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 14-04-2014 10:26
Ofcom's latest broadcasting bulletin came out today, issue number 252 and dated 14/4/2014 .
Studio 66 TV Days has been found "in breach" on 4 separate date's, 2 were from last December and and 2 from January this year .
Iv'e only looked at the main head lines in the bulletin so far and havent gone through it all yet, here is the latest bulletin http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/obb252/obb252.pdf
RE: Ofcom Discussion - admiral decker - 14-04-2014 10:54
(14-04-2014 10:26 )mr mystery Wrote: Studio 66 TV Days has been found "in breach" on 4 separate date's, 2 were from last December and and 2 from January this year .
The night show overran by 8 minutes on the last of the 4 occasions, finishing at 05:38 instead of 05:30, which was said by Studio 66 to be down to the producer being taken ill and going home early. The other 3 incidents involved Ofcom taking a very dim view of Fernanda's day show appearances - and looking at the caps from those days I can see why they found Studio 66 to be in breach, as Fernanda's dress on those occasions wasn't exactly modest.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - RatedR - 14-04-2014 11:48
I thought something was afoot, as they end the night show nakedness at 5 now. I can't imagine it's a genuine complaint, just some busy body trying to feel important. Who'd turn on at 5.30 hoping for a cheeky chat and be outraged a boob was still out? Complaints should only count from unhappy viewers, not people who turn on just to find something to complain about.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 14-04-2014 11:50
Is there a definitive guide to what constitutes 'modest' daytime dress?
I would guess it mainly comes down to making sure nipples are covered, with regards to the top half, but what is to stop a skimpy bikini top that just covers the nipples and not much else. Is there a minimum percentage of exposure that has to be applied or does it just depend on what the adjudicator decides is 'common sense' as they feel like it on that day.
Fernanda, for example, when half covered will be showing a larger area of boob than some other smaller girls just wearing pasties (which is probably a no-no anyway).
RE: Ofcom Discussion - RatedR - 14-04-2014 12:05
I think if the adjudicator gets an erection, it's deemed wrong. But only after he's been for a toilet break.