+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - admiral decker - 14-04-2014 12:29
(14-04-2014 11:48 )RatedR Wrote: I thought something was afoot, as they end the night show nakedness at 5 now.
Yes exactly - to prevent the danger of any further overruns.
To quote Ofcom: The Licensee outlined steps it had taken since this incident “to try to ensure this issue does not recur in the future”. It stated that it had “clarified and updated” its internal guidelines. The guidance now stated that: the transition from adult to daytime chat must not be too abrupt; that presenters “are required to be non-topless after 5am".
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 14-04-2014 12:31
(14-04-2014 11:50 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: Is there a definitive guide to what constitutes 'modest' daytime dress?
I would guess it mainly comes down to making sure nipples are covered, with regards to the top half, but what is to stop a skimpy bikini top that just covers the nipples and not much else. Is there a minimum percentage of exposure that has to be applied or does it just depend on what the adjudicator decides is 'common sense' as they feel like it on that day.
Fernanda, for example, when half covered will be showing a larger area of boob than some other smaller girls just wearing pasties (which is probably a no-no anyway).
This is Ofcom's latest revised guidelines for the daytime babe channels, they were published last year on the 15th of July 2013, Ofcom say a note of these guidelines was sent to the broadcasters .
Presenters clothing on daytime chat services
During daytime chat, all dress and behaviour should be non-sexual in tone and apparent intent. Therefore presenters should wear clothing that adequately covers their body's, in particular their breasts, genital area and buttocks .
RE: Ofcom Discussion - hatessexistofcon - 22-04-2014 00:05
Crazy Beaches still showing male genitals whilst blurring females..Sick of this sexist double standards and written to the channels for a reply and Ofcoms..Sick of these prick teasers what is so taboo about a fanny even on "one born every minute" children are going to learn they come out of a blur when they are born. So immature and offensive.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 23-04-2014 18:29
Its been a very long time since I last had a rant about ofcom but I feel the need to do so now with the alarming state of the channels declining.
Game of Thrones for example goes out to broadcast on SKY1 at 9PM and it has the most depraved sex acts that one can think imaginable. It has straight, gay, bi sex and even incest in alls its glory FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Did I say 9PM, yes that's right just incase nobody noticed yes it does indeed go to broadcast at 9. SKY1 is a channel that can easily be accessed by a minor as most parents or guardians would most likely not bother to go to the lengths to block it or put on a pin protection. Please note that this to me is not an issue as 9PM is indeed after the watershed.
So with that kind of action taking place lets take a look at the adult channels on the 900 sections at 9PM, the babes can't even get their tits out yet FFS
No we have to wait until 11PM before we get to see anything that comes close to naked. And when it does arrive just what delights do we have in store. Yes watered down rats piss. Legs must be kept closed at all times. Girl on girl action isn't even allowed. Same old tired and exhausted positions. It's getting boring now.
Because of work I haven't been able to stay up into the wee small hours of the morning so I instead record a few channels and watch them back the following day. Last night I recorded Studio66 and immediately disposed of the recordings. Infact very rarely do I ever bother to archive any of the shows.
I may cap and record the shows and post them on this forum but please know that I'm less than happy with the shit that's on offer. Also this is not helped by the egos of some of the so-called top talent on show. The other day I posted my brutally honest opinions on some of the babes that I was less than impressed with only for one of them to come on this forum and openly attack my honesty with the usual brown nosing brigade thanking her for it. Lame shows should not be encouraged and neither should lame producers either.
Game of Thrones at 9PM on SKY 1 = Full frontal sex and nudity.
Babe Channels at 9PM = Still dayshows
Are you happy, I know I'm not, something is seriously fucked up here
RE: Ofcom Discussion - RatedR - 23-04-2014 18:46
There was never any problem with the old rules either. The girls were never permitted or expected to provide hardcore entertainment, yes a few cases in 10 years of pushing it too far for non subscription services, but they were punished and the channels became more aware to stop that. But to change the rules further is just a way to generate fines. If channels start to obey a new rule, the rule is then changed. That should be the focus of any action against ofcom, as it is clearly improper behaviour from a regulator to manipulate rules soley to target one group of license holders, just because they are making money in the adult industry.
I'll add that. No, Ofcom are not sexist, they are not 'fucking twats', but they are severely overstepping their bounds of fair regulation. Which is even worse, because that is the only thing they should ever be as a regulator.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 23-04-2014 20:39
Good point Scottishbloke!
What's even funnier is that some porn stars are actually used in the scenes for Game Of Thrones, so basically Ofcom is allowing porn stars to be nude and engage in sex acts (Much of it non simulated) on TV at 9pm.
Ofcom is corrupt, confused and a pain in the ass.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 23-04-2014 20:44
(23-04-2014 20:39 )mrmann Wrote: Good point Scottishbloke!
What's even funnier is that some porn stars are actually used in the scenes for Game Of Thrones, so basically Ofcom is allowing porn stars to be nude and engage in sex acts (Much of it non simulated) on TV at 9pm.
Any evidence for the bit in bold? No, thought not.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 23-04-2014 20:50
(23-04-2014 20:44 )Digital Dave Wrote: Any evidence for the bit in bold? No, thought not.
Um yeah Dave, there's plenty of nipple sucking that isn't faked, ass licking that isn't faked, grinding bare bottoms on people's bare chests that isn't faked, bare ass smacking/grabbing that isn't faked.
Anything else, or do you think they use prosthetics for all of this?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 23-04-2014 21:44
You said "much of it non simulated", implying that they were having real sex most of the time. If all you're talking about is sexual contact as listed above then of course it's not simulated, otherwise how could it occur? Why even mention simulation?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 05-05-2014 01:46
Ofcom have launched a consultation on whether they should extend coregulation of TV advertising for another 5 years. Under the proposals the ASA would handle most advertising complaints, apart from Participation TV and associated areas of gambling and message board teleshopping formats, political adverts, product placement, sponsorship credits and scheduling.
The consultation period runs from 1 to 30 May.