+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - SYBORG666 - 04-12-2010 21:36
Unfortunatley I think there is more chance in me becoming the next king of England than Ofcom being abolished. I just wish the babechannels would get a backbone and challenge Ofcom.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 04-12-2010 21:46
(04-12-2010 21:36 )SYBORG666 Wrote: Unfortunatley I think there is more chance in me becoming the next king of England than Ofcom being abolished. I just wish the babechannels would get a backbone and challenge Ofcom.
Um, Bang Babes did just that, and now their best channel has been removed.
I'm all for the other channels challenging Ofcom, but I worry that Ofcom will just go after all of them as well.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 04-12-2010 23:20
(04-12-2010 21:36 )SYBORG666 Wrote: Unfortunatley I think there is more chance in me becoming the next king of England than Ofcom being abolished. I just wish the babechannels would get a backbone and challenge Ofcom.
It suits some of the channels to be limited to tame content. Their owners sell R18 by other means and want to protect their sales. Cross-media conflict of interest rules should ban sex shop owners and magazine publishers from operating adult channels.
[split] Bang media licence revoked - jimmyt73 - 07-12-2010 23:13
i was just wondering what ofcoms view of pre watershed nudity was as during an episode of miranda on bbc2 last night we saw a woman strip naked with her back to the camera surely this could based on their clamp down on bang media recently be in breach of regulations or is it one law for the bbc and another for an independent channel
p.s sorry if ive put this into the wrong thread
RE: Bang media licence revoked - StanTheMan - 08-12-2010 01:00
(07-12-2010 23:13 )jimmyt73 Wrote: i was just wondering what ofcoms view of pre watershed nudity was as during an episode of miranda on bbc2 last night we saw a woman strip naked with her back to the camera...
The attitude to daytime nudity is probably a lot more liberal than you imagine... just so long as it doesn't happen bewtween channels 901 and 967, apparantley
RE: Bang media licence revoked - eccles - 08-12-2010 02:11
(08-12-2010 01:00 )StanTheMan Wrote:(07-12-2010 23:13 )jimmyt73 Wrote: i was just wondering what ofcoms view of pre watershed nudity was as during an episode of miranda on bbc2 last night we saw a woman strip naked with her back to the camera...
The attitude to daytime nudity is probably a lot more liberal than you imagine... just so long as it doesn't happen bewtween channels 901 and 967, apparantley
From the back is probably OK. The BBFC is quite OK with nudity at cert 12 provided it is non sexual. Please tell me it was not Miranda.
I seem to remember that one of the original 1970s Pink Panther films had a topless back scene, where a woman undresses to go into a sauna. And thats a kids film from an era when pubes were not even permitted in adult porn.
Please tell me it was not Miranda. I wont sleep n
RE: Bang media licence revoked - Gaz "AV1" Aston - 08-12-2010 02:12
^ No it wasnt..you can sleep soundly
RE: Bang media licence revoked - eccles - 08-12-2010 02:20
(07-12-2010 23:13 )jimmyt73 Wrote: i was just wondering what ofcoms view of pre watershed nudity was as during an episode of miranda on bbc2 last night we saw a woman strip naked with her back to the camera surely this could based on their clamp down on bang media recently be in breach of regulations or is it one law for the bbc and another for an independent channel
p.s sorry if ive put this into the wrong thread
Or Sexcetera that LivinGit seem to be showing most nights from 11-12 and 12-1am on Sky 114, BELOW 2 BBC channels. Actual glimpses of pussy and cock (rhymes with "rock" in case the censor has been at it) and clear descriptions of fetish sex (a No-No according to Ofcom) such as women dressed head to toe in rubber, gas masks included, and a partial female-to-male transexual getting it from behind from his/her strap on wearing girlfriend.
Its a mainstream channel in the main area that appeals to varied audiences, not a clearly marked sex channel that can be locked out en block, and the only context is that the show is about sex.
RE: Bang media licence revoked - CumbrianTom - 08-12-2010 11:51
(08-12-2010 02:20 )eccles Wrote:(07-12-2010 23:13 )jimmyt73 Wrote: i was just wondering what ofcoms view of pre watershed nudity was as during an episode of miranda on bbc2 last night we saw a woman strip naked with her back to the camera surely this could based on their clamp down on bang media recently be in breach of regulations or is it one law for the bbc and another for an independent channel
p.s sorry if ive put this into the wrong thread
Or Sexcetera that LivinGit seem to be showing most nights from 11-12 and 12-1am on Sky 114, BELOW 2 BBC channels. Actual glimpses of pussy and cock (rhymes with "rock" in case the censor has been at it) and clear descriptions of fetish sex (a No-No according to Ofcom) such as women dressed head to toe in rubber, gas masks included, and a partial female-to-male transexual getting it from behind from his/her strap on wearing girlfriend.
Its a mainstream channel in the main area that appeals to varied audiences, not a clearly marked sex channel that can be locked out en block, and the only context is that the show is about sex.
Last night (Tuesday), Film4 showed "In The Cut", starring Meg Ryan and Mark Ruffalo. The film started at 11:45 and within 20 mins we saw a graphic scene where a woman was giving a blow job to a guy in the toilet. More sex, nudity and strong language was included throughout the film.
If anything even close to this was shown on one of the babe channels OFCOM would be down on them like the proverbial ton of bricks.
What irks me most is the amazing double standards shown by OFCOM. Maybe they believe that Film4 viewers are sophisticated movie buffs and are responsible persons while Babe Cahnnel fans aren't and need protecting from themselves.
Good enough for Film4 - Good enough for Bang Babes.
RE: Bang media licence revoked - gazfc - 08-12-2010 12:29
She was 'mimicking' a blow job and other sex acts, that happens on the babeshows all the time.
This thread is starting to make me laugh, most of you all claim to hate ofcom but you now want them to investigate and take action against every other channel, Where's your logic in that?