Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity (/showthread.php?tid=28022) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 |
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 08-10-2011 00:15 (06-10-2011 23:04 )eccles Wrote: The Body In Balance channel on Sky 275 (the yoga channel that shows Lovers Guide a few times a week) has a series starting Friday called "Lets Talk Sex". Thats 10:30 Friday Sky channel 275. Saw half an hour of this. Just a woman sitting on a sofa talking. Another woman joined in later. Cant see the attraction myself. Apologies to anyone who tuned in thinking it would be hot. RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Scottishbloke - 09-10-2011 02:06 Aye I did eccles, I had a king size box of Kleenex at the ready, you let me down mate RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Scottishbloke - 09-10-2011 02:11 Talking of mainstream nudity, this is no fucking joke but this actually made it onto the New Zealand news, watch out for the hot naked babe http://www.3news.co.nz/VIDEO-Nude-Rugby-in-Dunedin--full-match-contains-nudity/tabid/317/articleID/219724/Default.aspx RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - SCIROCCO - 12-10-2011 06:47 Have Ofcon been warning the channels again? Last night was terrbily tame across the board, lots of girls wearing lots of clothing well past 11pm?? Only 1 girl, on 966 with knickers off. Plus 275 has pixellated all the good stuff on Lovers Guide Extended....and the Playboy /TVX shows have suddenly gone away from showing erections, close up cunninlingus and lots of shots of mens backs and arses, which is not wot we tune in for! RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - shankey! - 12-10-2011 11:34 (12-10-2011 06:47 )SCIROCCO Wrote: Have Ofcon been warning the channels again? Last night was terrbily tame across the board, lots of girls wearing lots of clothing well past 11pm?? Only 1 girl, on 966 with knickers off. Plus 275 has pixellated all the good stuff on Lovers Guide Extended....and the Playboy /TVX shows have suddenly gone away from showing erections, close up cunninlingus and lots of shots of mens backs and arses, which is not wot we tune in for!it may have something to do with the new website the pm has set up regarding sexual content on the tv before the watershed,apparently parents can air their views on what is or isnt acceptable for their family via the internet ;( RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - StanTheMan - 12-10-2011 13:53 (12-10-2011 06:47 )SCIROCCO Wrote: Plus 275 has pixellated all the good stuff on Lovers Guide Extended.... Never even knew 275 showed such things. (12-10-2011 06:47 )SCIROCCO Wrote: it may have something to do with the new website the pm has set up regarding sexual content on the tv before the watershed,apparently parents can air their views on what is or isnt acceptable for their family via the internet ;( Eh? What website? RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - blackjaques - 12-10-2011 19:15 (12-10-2011 06:47 )SCIROCCO Wrote: Have Ofcon been warning the channels again? Last night was terrbily tame across the board, lots of girls wearing lots of clothing well past 11pm?? Only 1 girl, on 966 with knickers off. Plus 275 has pixellated all the good stuff on Lovers Guide Extended....and the Playboy /TVX shows have suddenly gone away from showing erections, close up cunninlingus and lots of shots of mens backs and arses, which is not wot we tune in for! Britain need not tremble. Ofcon has made it safe for us all. Hurrah. RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Scottishbloke - 12-10-2011 19:23 (12-10-2011 06:47 )SCIROCCO Wrote: Have Ofcon been warning the channels again? Last night was terrbily tame across the board, lots of girls wearing lots of clothing well past 11pm?? Only 1 girl, on 966 with knickers off. Plus 275 has pixellated all the good stuff on Lovers Guide Extended....and the Playboy /TVX shows have suddenly gone away from showing erections, close up cunninlingus and lots of shots of mens backs and arses, which is not wot we tune in for! Well most of the models onscreen last night were the ones who if given the freedom to show a lot more, still wouldn't, you just knew by the line up's across the whole board of channels that it was going to be tame even before the shows even got into action so to speak RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - shankey! - 12-10-2011 20:54 (12-10-2011 13:53 )StanTheMan Wrote:Internet providers offer parents bar on porn(12-10-2011 06:47 )SCIROCCO Wrote: Plus 275 has pixellated all the good stuff on Lovers Guide Extended.... COMMENTS (611) David Cameron said parents could feel ''it is a jungle out there''Continue reading the main story Related Stories Children grow up too fast, say parents Call for music video age ratings Pop stars and computer porn Four leading web providers are to offer customers the option to block adult content at the point of subscription. BT, Sky, TalkTalk and Virgin will offer the protection for smartphones, laptops and PCs. It comes as David Cameron on Monday met industry representatives amid concern over sexualisation of children. The prime minister also launched Parentport - a website to help parents complain about inappropriate content. RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - damncensorship - 12-10-2011 23:23 I actually think it's a good thing that the government and IPs are tackling the REAL problems that are affecting kids. Music videos and lyrics have gone from subtle and almost innocent to containing downright in-your-face sexual content. As for the internet, parents should have been doing more in the first place to restrict websites that their children can browse I mean it's not rocket science to do this. The fact that the major ISPs are offering more protection is excellent in my opinion. I think short term this will make the babe channels a lot tamer (and I can see a complete ban on the babe day channels) but after a while once the inconsistencies in content on 'regular tv' are ironed out, then perhaps a proper discussion can be had to allow us adults to watch more than ZOO and NUTS strength programming at night. |