The UK Babe Channels Forum
S66 Studio Closure - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255)
+----- Forum: STUDIO 66 TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=66)
+----- Thread: S66 Studio Closure (/showthread.php?tid=86342)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40


RE: S66 Studio Closure - Kingsmind - 25-09-2022 21:51

(25-09-2022 12:19 )Lord Rockingham Wrote:  So Arura Sky has her place in history as the last ever girl on the TV channel. Looking back through the threads, Michelle Thorne was the first girl.

She needs to join BS she is epic , she would of been naked every single stint on S66 if she was allowed to but of course S66 become very tame.


RE: S66 Studio Closure - Rake - 26-09-2022 08:08

(25-09-2022 12:19 )Lord Rockingham Wrote:  So Arura Sky has her place in history as the last ever girl on the TV channel. Looking back through the threads, Michelle Thorne was the first girl.

Can you imagine her and her parents' pride?


RE: S66 Studio Closure - Tumble_Drier - 26-09-2022 12:32

^ in years to come I’m sure “who was the last person to appear on Studio 66 TV” will pop up as a question in the General Knowledge round on Mastermind.

It’s a truly momentous occasion Wink


RE: S66 Studio Closure - ShandyHand - 26-09-2022 15:58

(21-09-2022 01:11 )davy crockett Wrote:  
(08-09-2022 13:36 )Glenn Miller Wrote:  The number of girls using the studio has been dwindling for some time, since about the start of the year I reckon. There must come a point at which it would be hard to justify keeping the studio going.

There was a tweet by S66 which bears this out. When they announced the closure of the studio they followed it up with another tweet which referred to lack of demand by creators for studio access.

Have you guys ever noticed the complete lack of anything self-critical in such notices? I know it's something you're supposed to avoid in business. But, over time, when so many things happen that destabilise an operator's output, some hint of humility or occassional culpability might not go amiss. (Babes not wanting to go into the 66 studio by the end was precipitated by a long and tangled history. See my last post on this thread.)

Instead, it's ALWAYS someone else's - something EXTERNAL'S - fault. Freeloaders, uploaders, trolls, energy crisis, the demand for TV, rents? Worse, saying these things often implies it's the userbase's fault. Or at least a problem with some guys the paying users have more akin with than with people within the industry... (Whilst, of course, still retaining the necessary deniability of "...didn't mean YOU baby!" for those crucial transaction baiting moments.Rolleyes )

Not once do they admit to doing anything that has expedited the pull of these outside factors. Not once do they admit to compounding a situation, or show they even question WHY things like demand for TV fell off a cliff so badly that they felt they could pull whole sections of programming and look to just simply carry on hitting the spot with already reeling customer base. No, let's try to convince everyone everything would have been honky dory but for those pesky foreign pipelines and gas prices! Let's pretend more than half a year of a disfunctional website is perfectly normal and nothing to do with anything. Let's pretend switching to excluding any number of old punters with arbitrary spending requirements was no part of any lack of vibe around the place.

We hear no hint that anyone considers this just might have anything to do with the fact they have been consistently undermining TV and studio output in favour of their chase for shiny new $ elsewhere for years now. (Not just looking for additional money note but actively taking away elements that made the older stuff work in the name of boosting the new. Every. Single. Time.) That they consistently played an active part in devaluing what they were already giving existing customers in the name of putting their content, attentiveness and effort elsewhere? Could general interest be down because the industry has, again for years, and consistently, placed self care over and above the needs of its end users? Ease of babe use over the granting of optimal customer experiences? (66's new site claimed to be all about the customer but I'd ask those still using it to name one way it has really enhanced their experiences. Then I'd ask the same guys to think of ways in which they know it has improved things for the babes? See what I mean...)

Even the latest Ofcom fine was the other side of that same poor customer care coin, reflecting as it did a totally unheeded bugbear of chatters and posters for many years: The relevant producers missed what multiple Ofcom troubling naughties were being said on the daytime mic for the same cba reason they used to miss the fact the babe was mouthing words guys couldn't here - time after time after time! How can you hope to spot when a babe is saying the wrong thing when you've consistently proven you don't care if she's being heard saying the right stuff even?!!! (The outcome is the same, whether it was always case of cba or was sometimes a matter of them being under-resourced. It likely edged more to the latter in recent times granted.)

Truth is, this industry will never stop chasing its tail, never stop debilitating what it has while trying to maximise the return from the latest shiny gimmick, until it realises that the only true success lies in consistently fulfilling a properly varied multitude of guys' desires in a truly empathetic experience enhancing way. Not just constantly looking to pluck the easiest lowest hanging fruit. Even if that means - shock , horror - making their lives slightly less convenient from time to time in order to do it. Stopping despising its customers would help too.

Truth is, once 66 went down to one TV Channel they were inevitably done on the box. But hey let's just say we haven't propelled ourselves in this same direction over the last 5 years (at least).


RE: S66 Studio Closure - Hobgoblin - 26-09-2022 17:01

When I was channel hopping last night, Nikita Reign was on one BS channel and Brooksie Brooks was on the other, with Kendall Kay doing a lil solo stint on Xpanded (Ashton on break).

If ever that was proof that S66 had no problem in terms of talent. It was the piss poor way they were managed.


RE: S66 Studio Closure - aaron - 28-09-2022 16:57

(26-09-2022 12:32 )Tumble_Drier Wrote:  ^ in years to come I’m sure “who was the last person to appear on Studio 66 TV” will pop up as a question in the General Knowledge round on Mastermind.

It’s a truly momentous occasion Wink

[Image: image-BE0E_63346E50.jpg]


RE: S66 Studio Closure - hornball - 28-09-2022 19:30

^laugh


RE: S66 Studio Closure - Kingsmind - 29-09-2022 00:45

I can imagine Arura telling all the babes i was the last one on S66 in a WWE style segment way , the babes would wonder what is going on.


[split] studio 66 sky channel 923 to closedown - racey9411 - 29-09-2022 09:55

Not everyone has a smart tv, also I will refuse to “loose” my card details to these web miners


RE: studio 66 sky channel 923 to closedown - racey9411 - 29-09-2022 09:58

Where will Jada be seen as she was only on Sky Studio 66 after being removed from the Freeview platform