Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version

Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394

RE: Ofcom Discussion - RUsure - 29-06-2014 18:27

(31-05-2014 08:10 )gunnar Wrote: Don't think Ofcom will be happy until were back in Victorian England.

Ofcom will be happy when women can no longer be seen to be publicly arousing men; full stop. Why should this be the case? Because homosexuals and sexual deviants in high political offices are utilizing the smokescreen of Governmental moral concern to suppress what they are fearful and jealous of (women's power to delight the senses). They have no regard for logic, truth, or justice where the issue of female public nudity is concerned; just an emotional refusal to accept what their own perverse sexuality cannot contend with; and compels them to feel insecure and LIMP.

RE: Ofcom Discussion - JuanKerr - 02-07-2014 19:41

(22-06-2014 19:00 )blackjaques Wrote: The last time watched The Adult Channel there were lots of shots of erections. Erect genitalia is classified in sex works as R18.
Ofcon allow it on UK TV.
I cannot vouch for the gay channels but I'm sure that equal opportunities would prevail on them.
It shows the utter hypocrisy of our television censor (and our government).

My mistake. I thought hatessexistofcon was referring to mainstream TV.

But in that case, isn't his argument still flawed? I don't watch any of PPV adult channels, but are you telling me erections are allowed, but female genitalia isn't?

RE: Ofcom Discussion - blackjaques - 02-07-2014 20:01

When I watched both Playboy Group & TVX (admittedly a while ago) Playboy Group was much more explicit. Plenty of full-on nudity, and erect penises. TVX was, I thought, quite tame. I'd never subscribe long term to them at all.

RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 03-07-2014 21:45

Latest Ofcom Audience attitudes study published
...
In the past five years, there have been falls in the number of viewers saying there is ‘too much’ violence (35% of adult viewers in 2013, down from 55% in 2008), sex (26% in 2013 versus 35% in 2008) and swearing (35% in 2013 versus 53% in 2008) on TV.

One reason for this is a change in attitude among older viewers. The number of viewers over 65 who believe there is too much swearing (78% in 2008 compared to 55% in 2013) and violence (75% in 2008 compared to 52% in 2013) has fallen over the past five years.

Among those adults who had been offended by something on TV in the last 12 months (18% of adult viewers), nearly four times more people are likely to continue watching the programme than in 2008 (5% in 2008 versus 19% in 2013) and less likely to turn off the TV altogether (32% in 2008 compared to 19% in 2013).
News
UK audience attitudes to broadcast media

RE: Ofcom Discussion - gunnar - 04-07-2014 22:04

I wonder will things change when this shower of crap is kicked out of office in less than a years time.

RE: Ofcom Discussion - benrichards7 - 05-07-2014 15:16

(04-07-2014 22:04 )gunnar Wrote: I wonder will things change when this shower of crap is kicked out of office in less than a years time.

only if rolf harris gets the job!!!!

RE: Ofcom Discussion - blackjaques - 05-07-2014 18:58

(04-07-2014 22:04 )gunnar Wrote: I wonder will things change when this shower of crap is kicked out of office in less than a years time.

I don't think so, unfortunately.

We have Middle England expressing outrage on the Right & The Sisterhood expressing outrage on the Left.
What a fucking depressing situation.

A plea to UK politicians: Please let us grow up.

RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 07-07-2014 22:45

(04-07-2014 22:04 )gunnar Wrote: I wonder will things change when this shower of crap is kicked out of office in less than a years time.

Probably not a good time to expect a sympathetic reaction from any politician on sex related matters.

RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 07-07-2014 22:56

Ofcom Chief Exec makes a barely concealed bid to take over BBC Trust role.

Because Ofcom is fully of people with heavyweight experience of running billion pound budgets and actually making thousands of hours of drama that attracts audiences in large numbers. Yeah right.

Quote:BBC Trust stance over payoffs ‘beyond belief’, says Ofcom chief

Ed Richards tells Commons committee it would be possible for media watchdog to have greater role in regulating corporation
Guardian 2 July 2014

RE: Ofcom Discussion - hatessexistofcon - 08-07-2014 04:16

(21-06-2014 16:03 )JuanKerr Wrote:
(11-06-2014 23:39 )hatessexistofcon Wrote: A long time ago erections were banned on UK tv now they are allowed when Ofcom arrived so not showing female genitals is tv's last taboo.

Since when, outside of medical and sex educational programmes, have erections been allowed? Give me some examples.

I see what you mean but strippers on channel 4 had an erection in a penis pump.Sexters on channel 5 had big erection on it with foreskin fully retracted.I am fighting for equal genital nudity I am not interested in graphic shagging..If these channels 3,4,5 in uk started showing female genitals the way they portray male I will shut up but they don't and they have NEVER give a valid reason.There is no reason unless Ofcom are lying to me ..I cannot get an answer the tv companys don't respond to me anymore silly scared gits.

I would love to know who does the editing/blurring on the docus? is it the tv company or the company that makes them? There are a lot of them,TWO/FOUR media,Firecracker even Endomol etc.