+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - covkid - 12-09-2015 14:35
S66 have to throw a shed load of cash to Cara and Mikaela to do a full night show, or at least 3 or 4 hours of tease, whilst any channel needs to do the same to Holly McGuire to rejuvenate the channels.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 12-09-2015 16:21
The future of nightshows looks very bleak.
The whole point of their existence has never appeared to be in sharper focus than now. The question has to be asked 'What are nightshows for?'.
Some might claim the answer is purely profits and calls.
Some might say tits and arse.
Some might say a sexually stimulating show.
If the majority answer is profits and calls then the question surely becomes about how best to generate them.
The positive answer imo would say put on the dirtiest, horniest, filthiest shows possible within the rules.
If the response to this is that the rules or the channel interpretation of the rules only allows for the sort of shows we get at present then I fear the end is nigh.
If the answer is tits and arse I would say yes this should be an automatic prerequisite.
However if it is just tits and arse with no movement, change of position or hint of visual sexual stimulation I would argue tits and arse in isolation is simply not enough.
May as well buy a top shelf lads mag and look at the pictures.
You won't get any less movement and can cut to the chase a damned sight quicker.
So we move on to the third category I mentioned.
A sexually stimulating show. So many factors go into making this possible. The set and how it is used, the body language, the movement, the range of position and pose, the intensity, spontaneity and imagination of it all.
Get it right and some truly electrifying shows ensue.
Make these the norm rather than the exception everybody would be happier. Without visual sexual stimulation my view is the nightshows will ALWAYS FAIL.
Tits and arse is not enough. Profits are all very fine but make no difference to me as a viewer or caller.
And if my example is anything to go by the channels should be worried. My calls to nightshows have dropped massively.
If others like me are following suit then how is this bolstering profits exactly? The answer to my question appears to be that the cost of calls has gone up on some channels. £2 per minute, £1.80 per minute etc.
Higher cost for lower quality product
.And I see and hear more babes complaining at lack of calls than ever before.
If it isn't higher cost for calls it is endless plugging of pics and vids by use of the mic WHEN CALLERS ARE IN THE QUEUE!!
Alternatively clog up the screen with countless OSGs instead to further diminish the quality of show.
I also see more double babe stints than ever which are utterly futile as no genuine sexual interaction is allowed anyway and neither babe has sufficient room to do anything of any quality or significance.
Have no fear however. When the complaints are duly noted the excuse will be OFCOM. After all it always is these days
.The anti freeloader mentality of too many nightshow babes does not help and nor does the culture of wishlist and findom.
It feels like the babes have joined forces with the channels in an attempt to screw as much money out of as many 'gullable suckers and losers' as possible by foul means and fouler.
I note even the idea of a return follow on Twitter and naughty pics via dm have been used as bargaining chips for wishlist purchases
.This is the very height of pretentious self importance and posturing which no matter how hot the babe is in my view quite despicable and shallow.
If people don't call they are accused of being freeloaders.
If people do call they will no doubt be deemed as sad and pathetic perverts with nothing better to do with their time or money.
So what hope is there for any of us?
The channels and rather too many babes seem incapable of accepting or understanding criticism even when constructive.
Bearing all this in mind is it any wonder that former regular callers such as myself hold the nightshows, channels and at times even some of the babes in utter contempt?
Serious questions lay at the door of the channels and those that represent them. I have bemoaned many times the white flags of concession being proudly waved by all channels.
But more worryingly even than this is my growing feeling that the channels are absolving themselves of all responsibility to make the current product better than it is.
In every respect they seem to have given up and used OFCOM as the last line of defence.
A sad state of affairs indeed.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - HEX!T - 12-09-2015 17:06
you gotta love the cheek of some of the girls. the only freeloaders are the 1s charging to watch there cams and then do nothing unless they get massive tips. but im glad to say that has bit them in the ass in both call stats and guys willing to pay to watch em.
as for the girls who call the guys perverts!.
some of the nastiest most deprived shit ive ever heard come out of a mouth has come from the girls themselves.
most of the guys ive seen in there rooms just wanna wank over a nice pair of tits with a few pussy shots thrown in for measure.
yet i heard 1 girl "claim!" she likes to be tied down, blind folded and fucked in the ass by a complete stranger till he comes inside her, and when he pulls out he can piss in her asshole...
thats just fucking nasty... even if your just saying it for effect thats nasty...
surprisingly that came out of clare richards mouth. she said it without batting an eye and with a completely straight face. yet im the perve because i watch her go topless on tv?
i thought 2 girls 1 cup was about as depraved as it gets, but fuck me i threw up in my mouth a bit when i heard that shit.
i used to love coming here and saying wow this or that 1 did a great show, along with the odd criticism. (especially when it pissed off there fanboys)
but since i took a 2.5 year break and returned to see whats happening now, i find it hard to say anything nice about any of the girls even the 1s i did/do like.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 12-09-2015 17:48
That's quite a long rant Snookered, even though nightshows are poor it doesn't mean dayshows are any better some daybabes are extremely tedious to watch, it really pisses me off when i see daybabes play on their phones or laptops you don't see nightbabes do that
Plus Daybabes have more of a anti freeloading mentality than the nightbabes which is the main reason for them doing dayshows, quite a few of them act like divas from what i've read on here esp the S66 daybabes
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 12-09-2015 17:50
Some of the usage of phones / tablets must be channel sanctioned/promotional : soliciting and responding to text messages and the like ?
(Doesn't make it more interesting to watch, but maybe all of it isn't just them pissing about ?)
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 12-09-2015 18:04
The daytime shows do their job more effectively than nightshows imo. The expectation of a daytime babe is more about the outfit and the on screen demeanour of the babe.
Flirty, cheeky and vivacious. A lot of the daytime babes I see meet my criteria for a fun daytime show.
Of course not all babes do so.
But I believe more daytime babes do an effective job than nightshow babes.
Even the set does not have the same level of importance.
The laptops and mobiles are used by daytime babes as I understand it to reply to texts to the show and tweets to the babes as a method of interacting with viewers between calls most notably on S66. This being the case I have no problem with it. Keeps things interactive. There is not the same emphasis on provocative sexual movement on daytime. The demands are different.
The interactive dimension on nightshows seems to be more about the calls. The nightshows are about filthy calls in response to filthy, horny shows. The capability of channel and babe to bring in the calls is the key and it judging by the amount of moaning at lack of calls and by the amount of phone waving they are failing.
If they want to improve the call numbers they should focus on improving the visual product to entice the calls in the first place imo.
As for whether daytime has more anti freeloaders than nightshows well I suspect both have many guilty parties but the nightshow freeloaders are infinitely more frustrating imo.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 12-09-2015 18:58
The blame can be set at the door of S66 they started us on the bad road. With the bitching about channels and trying go make night shows extended day shows and complaining when other channels did night shows.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 12-09-2015 20:16
(12-09-2015 17:06 )HEX!T Wrote: you gotta love the cheek of some of the girls. the only freeloaders are the 1s charging to watch there cams and then do nothing unless they get massive tips. but im glad to say that has bit them in the ass in both call stats and guys willing to pay to watch em.
as for the girls who call the guys perverts!.
some of the nastiest most deprived shit ive ever heard come out of a mouth has come from the girls themselves.
most of the guys ive seen in there rooms just wanna wank over a nice pair of tits with a few pussy shots thrown in for measure.
yet i heard 1 girl "claim!" she likes to be tied down, blind folded and fucked in the ass by a complete stranger till he comes inside her, and when he pulls out he can piss in her asshole...
thats just fucking nasty... even if your just saying it for effect thats nasty...
surprisingly that came out of clare richards mouth. she said it without batting an eye and with a completely straight face. yet im the perve because i watch her go topless on tv?
i thought 2 girls 1 cup was about as depraved as it gets, but fuck me i threw up in my mouth a bit when i heard that shit.
i used to love coming here and saying wow this or that 1 did a great show, along with the odd criticism. (especially when it pissed off there fanboys)
but since i took a 2.5 year break and returned to see whats happening now, i find it hard to say anything nice about any of the girls even the 1s i did/do like.
Did Clare claim that we all were perverts, or that callers are perverts? If so, then yes she's a big hypocrite. She grinds Afroman's crotch and lets him feel her bare ass because she likes it and wants to get the callers/viewers all hot, talks about the nasty stuff you mentioned about pissing in her ass, and yet we're the ones who are all pervs? Typical
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - terence - 12-09-2015 20:22
^where did he say clare called anyone pervs? posts like the one above are how 20 or 30 pages of unnecessary and uncalled for clare richard's character assassination start.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 12-09-2015 20:45
I asked him a question, I didn't state that Clare said we were pervs. I got the impression from his comment that maybe he was suggesting Clare was one of the women who thought that way about us.
...