+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 11-02-2015 01:28
This Thread seems a bit dead at the moment. Right so if you think Ofcom are bad you might want to look further to Australia. I did a google search just out of curiosity to see if down under then had the equivalent to Babestation in the name of maybe something along the lines of Aussie Babes. Well they did try to get one started but it never got off the ground due to even tougher regulations than our friends ofcom enforce on our channels.
https://melonfarmers.wordpress.com/2012/11/30/babes-in-australia-interesting-article-outline-how-australian-tv-tried-out-babe-channel-programming/
Very bizarre as the Aussies have got a pretty laid back attitude to nudity going by the number of nude beaches they have in their country
RE: Ofcom Discussion - SecretAgent - 11-02-2015 06:42
^
Babestation did broadcast Bikini Babes AU to Australia fairly recently for a few months but it was a stream of the Dayshow to them which was during their night. I had a number of calls where I was in a queue behind randy Australians just in from the pub frustrated that the girls were clothed and restricted to daytime chat. Heard guys cut off more than once for telling Danni Levy what they wanted to do with her even though she was telling them it was flirty chat only.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 11-02-2015 23:48
I always used to think the Aussies were an open minded crowd with beaches full of fit babes in microscopic bikinis and uninhibited strippers in the bars, but it seems running a farm so vast it is 3 days drive to the neighbours in a harsh and unforgiving climate favours a hard working no frills mindset. Its different when they go abroad. Hope that hasn't upset anyone.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - HEX!T - 12-02-2015 00:43
lol far from it mate. there even more repressive with there media than we are.
i dunno how many times i have seen video games get banned for nudity but the censor is quite willing to allow extreme violence.
the phrase "no sex were ex british comes to mind". and dont get me started on how much there censoring the internet.
australia and newzeland have become the testing grounds for tyranny dressed in the guise of protecting the populations morals.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 14-02-2015 01:11
ATVOD rules on adult services
UK video-on-demand regulator ATVOD has ruled that two adult services have breached statutory rules put in place to protect children.
The regulator ruled that Daisy Rock UK and She Bang TV allowed under 18s to access content viewable on-demand by allowing free, unrestricted access to videos and images and by making full-length videos available to any visitor who paid a fee.
ATVOD said that the operator of Daisy Rock UK subsequently put its content out of reach of children, but had appealed with Ofcom against a separate ATVOD ruling that its service falls within the scope of the statutory rules.
The operator of She Bang TV failed to become fully compliant in accordance with a timetable set by ATVOD. The service provider has therefore been referred to Ofcom for consideration of a sanction.
http://www.digitaltveurope.net/320152/atvod-rules-on-adult-services/
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 14-02-2015 02:05
If the UK Government put half as much effort into the real issues of the day other than trying to place sanctions and ban anything that is harmless erotica then we'd be at peace with the world right now.
I don't see any change in policy towards ofcom or censorship after the General Election result. All the major party's are in agreement over this agenda. Just finished watching Ali G Indahouse, unless we get somebody like him running for Government then I'm afraid we're stuck in repressive Britain
RE: Ofcom Discussion - HEX!T - 14-02-2015 03:27
shebang may call themselves shebang tv but there a cam show so dont fall under the remit.if they find out they do or atvod decide they do then shebang would be wise to appeal straight away in court rather than in tribunal at ofcom.
that way atvod and ofcom will have to prove actual harm done.
coz it looks to me like there trying to regulate the web and thats beyond there remit as far as im aware and looks to me like there going for easy targets to fill there coffers rather than upholding standards.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - munch1917 - 14-02-2015 08:00
^^^ Shebang also provide recordings of previous shows, which is streaming video content which is what ATVOD regulate, and it sounds like it is that content that has been investigated, not the live cam shows.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - bigglesworth - 14-02-2015 10:58
^^^ Yes it has to be. According to the report from eccles the investigation concerned "content viewable on-demand".
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 15-02-2015 02:43
(14-02-2015 08:00 )munch1917 Wrote: ^^^ Shebang also provide recordings of previous shows, which is streaming video content which is what ATVOD regulate, and it sounds like it is that content that has been investigated, not the live cam shows.
For the regulations to apply the content must be television like, and it is debatable whether recordings of a live sex show qualify. It does not compete with broadcast tv.