(20-01-2020 19:47 )ShandyHand Wrote:  This thread continues to be the fascinating read of those concerning the 66 shows atm. Keep up the good work in documenting this stuff lads, it's appreciated.

(20-01-2020 01:11 )snookered Wrote:  Yes I very much suspect it is S66 and NOT Lola

This does seem the most likely background for what you guys saw last night. Some boss (or two) didn't like the implications of what Lola had slipped into doing these things. Why else overule the babe's (as Steemw confirmed earlier, now weeks' long) established and clear inclination to do her goals 'fta'? As ever, there seems the implication that things get (peevishly?) corrected back to company policy at 66 only after a show makes a little splash of publicity on this forum! Winsaw appears right on the 66 thread: It takes some insiders a long time to admit things have moved on.

Hopefully Lola's latest thong artifact - toast! - will soon be proved as a metaphor for some bts' overly protectionist thinking here.

(20-01-2020 01:40 )Stemmw Wrote:  ... decided by whichever clown is running the show on that specific night. I feel there was a different person in charge Thursday when Lola did her epic stint. Could be wrong but it has always felt like this going back months and years. one night the women on tv would have a lot of freedom, decent camera work, then the next night with the same women is no movement and head shot only, then back again ...

Also bang on IMO. I've long sensed the same based on what we see onscreen from the same babes on consecutive shifts (even sometimes ones on the same day a week later). And it is indeed most noticable (because the crew have more input) on nights. 

It is only realistic to assume some crews have more creativity, greater independent thought, than others. They are more confident to go with a vibe of a progressive, sparking show - to let it take it's natural course; more inclined to give the babe her head if things feel right in the moment, etc. They are more likely to trust the babe knows what she is doing. In other words they may well look to get the right results even if it means rubbing against the boring standard m.o. 

Lesser crews, otoh, would be more likely to just stick to what they've been told works best most often (the denial of properly erotic visuals inspiring greater cam use mainly). They stick to this rule no matter what might be instinctual to the babe or what might occur unexpectedly on the night. This type crew member tends to doubt the babe, thinking she will run into trouble for showing too much and so pull her back to play safe. They have no real feeling for the punter or what works on a show, they just produce by rote. Directing things in this fashion these crews are far more likely to churn out the duller, deader, shows from the punters pov. The babes just don't stand as much chance of getting the same quality through.

(20-01-2020 22:56 )GMach1 Wrote:  Snookered wrote: Hopefully Lola's latest thong artifact - toast! - will soon be proved as a metaphor for some bts' overly protectionist thinking here.

Or she might just have been hungry!

(20-01-2020 22:56 )GMach1 Wrote:  Snookered wrote: Hopefully Lola's latest thong artifact - toast! - will soon be proved as a metaphor for some bts' overly protectionist thinking here.

Or she might just have been hungry!

(23-01-2020 23:21 )snookered Wrote:  Tip goal up.
2500 for an oiled up naked work out.
Nowt so far