+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Xtreme Filth (/forumdisplay.php?fid=335)
+---- Thread: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=61914)
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - irishcyclist - 23-09-2014 20:52
Emily's looking good
Hope to see more of her!
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - tbone83 - 23-09-2014 21:02
Is she the blonde? Love her if so
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - irishcyclist - 23-09-2014 21:26
(23-09-2014 21:02 )tbone83 Wrote: Is she the blonde? Love her if so
She's the brunette.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - JuanKerr - 23-09-2014 21:28
(22-09-2014 09:02 )KerrAvon Wrote: Quite clear this is S66's attempt to battle the competitive budget call rate/web show combo that xPanded are dominating at the moment. Waste of time trying to masquerade it as 'independent' when anyone can see it's not, not like S66 is any longer an 'Elite' brand to protect
It even uses the same fucking background music, and some people still insist it's a 'new' channel
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - Digital Dave - 23-09-2014 22:11
I've said this for a while. Admin and his various sock puppets obviously have an agenda in perpetuating the myth that this is an independent production.
To reiterate: why the hell would S66 sub-contract a channel to a couple of inexperienced models, whilst themselves under investigation by Ofcom?
Xtreme Filth = S66.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - tbone83 - 23-09-2014 22:14
The blonde still has me hard as fuck, whoever her boss is
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - Money_Shot - 24-09-2014 07:37
(23-09-2014 22:11 )Digital Dave Wrote: I've said this for a while.
You sound remarkably like the 9/11 Truth Movement. You insist you're being lied to, but can't come up with a single shred of evidence that would convince anyone outside of your own conspiracy group. So far you haven't even supplied a motive for this conspiracy of yours.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - terence - 24-09-2014 07:56
(23-09-2014 22:11 )Digital Dave Wrote: I've said this for a while. Admin and his various sock puppets obviously have an agenda in perpetuating the myth that this is an independent production.
To reiterate: why the hell would S66 sub-contract a channel to a couple of inexperienced models, whilst themselves under investigation by Ofcom?
Xtreme Filth = S66.
dave, this sock puppet (who has previously posted no comment on the supposed independence of the channel) is of the opinion that this 'discussion' is less about the actual independence of the channel and more a semantical argument about the word 'independence' and it's varying levels of interpretation.
imo.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - Charlemagne - 24-09-2014 08:00
(23-09-2014 22:11 )Digital Dave Wrote: I've said this for a while. Admin and his various sock puppets obviously have an agenda in perpetuating the myth that this is an independent production.
So even when Admin as a favour finds out what's been happening at Studio 66 your still in denial.
But is anyone actually bothered who's running Xtremefith.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - JuanKerr - 24-09-2014 09:23
(24-09-2014 07:37 )Money_Shot Wrote: You insist you're being lied to, but can't come up with a single shred of evidence that would convince anyone outside of your own conspiracy group.
You mean aside from them using the same background music, familiar faces from S66 and the frequent appearance of the S66 logo?
Yes, I see your point. Why anyone would think there's a connection is beyond me too