(31-01-2022 20:51 )pvam1 Wrote:  The reason we don't see much of the newish girls is that its clear Vicky, Honey, Michelle, Ashton and Maria have agreements to do 2 nights a week which only leaves 4 slots for Georgie, Lola, Kendall, Abigaile, Hazel, Roxy, Ellise, Becky, Natasha, Jessy and Alotta.

And then there's day girls who never get a night slot like Tia, Cookie, Jenna, Dakota, Clara, Poppi, Louise, Rae Rae and Hannah fair enough if some don't want to do night but some might and there is very little opportunity.

Not sure what they can do about it but that does seem to be the issue.

(02-02-2022 15:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote:  

(29-01-2022 23:13 )mrmann Wrote:  Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.

I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude. Unless you're going to frequently pay lots of money to watch on a 'perv cam', you'll be deprived the glorious sight of Maria Smith, Michelle Moist and many others lying back on the bed with their legs spread wide apart teasing their fingers around their crotch. Of course they're wearing tiny panties (even doubled up sometimes), but for me that's a much better sight than the totally naked girls on Babestation, where the camera rarely shows all their body or they're partly hidden by the onscreen graphics.

Perhaps because I like the sight of a woman clad in sexy lingerie far more than a woman totally nude (I still get off on the tease and suggestion) it might make my argument a bit biased. But I think we still see far more of the girls bodies on Xpanded than on Babestation. And you only have to see how that channel is currently faring now it's pretty much all cam shows.

And of course who's to say if all the girls want to go fully nude anyway? Michelle, Vicki and Kendall would probably have no issue, but what about the other girls?

(02-02-2022 15:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote:  

(29-01-2022 23:13 )mrmann Wrote:  Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.

I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude. Unless you're going to frequently pay lots of money to watch on a 'perv cam', you'll be deprived the glorious sight of Maria Smith, Michelle Moist and many others lying back on the bed with their legs spread wide apart teasing their fingers around their crotch. Of course they're wearing tiny panties (even doubled up sometimes), but for me that's a much better sight than the totally naked girls on Babestation, where the camera rarely shows all their body or they're partly hidden by the onscreen graphics.

Perhaps because I like the sight of a woman clad in sexy lingerie far more than a woman totally nude (I still get off on the tease and suggestion) it might make my argument a bit biased. But I think we still see far more of the girls bodies on Xpanded than on Babestation. And you only have to see how that channel is currently faring now it's pretty much all cam shows.

And of course who's to say if all the girls want to go fully nude anyway? Michelle, Vicki and Kendall would probably have no issue, but what about the other girls?

(02-02-2022 15:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote:  

(29-01-2022 23:13 )mrmann Wrote:  Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.

I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude. Unless you're going to frequently pay lots of money to watch on a 'perv cam', you'll be deprived the glorious sight of Maria Smith, Michelle Moist and many others lying back on the bed with their legs spread wide apart teasing their fingers around their crotch. Of course they're wearing tiny panties (even doubled up sometimes), but for me that's a much better sight than the totally naked girls on Babestation, where the camera rarely shows all their body or they're partly hidden by the onscreen graphics.

Perhaps because I like the sight of a woman clad in sexy lingerie far more than a woman totally nude (I still get off on the tease and suggestion) it might make my argument a bit biased. But I think we still see far more of the girls bodies on Xpanded than on Babestation. And you only have to see how that channel is currently faring now it's pretty much all cam shows.

And of course who's to say if all the girls want to go fully nude anyway? Michelle, Vicki and Kendall would probably have no issue, but what about the other girls?

(02-02-2022 15:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote:  

(29-01-2022 23:13 )mrmann Wrote:  Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.

I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude. Unless you're going to frequently pay lots of money to watch on a 'perv cam', you'll be deprived the glorious sight of Maria Smith, Michelle Moist and many others lying back on the bed with their legs spread wide apart teasing their fingers around their crotch. Of course they're wearing tiny panties (even doubled up sometimes), but for me that's a much better sight than the totally naked girls on Babestation, where the camera rarely shows all their body or they're partly hidden by the onscreen graphics.

Perhaps because I like the sight of a woman clad in sexy lingerie far more than a woman totally nude (I still get off on the tease and suggestion) it might make my argument a bit biased. But I think we still see far more of the girls bodies on Xpanded than on Babestation. And you only have to see how that channel is currently faring now it's pretty much all cam shows.

And of course who's to say if all the girls want to go fully nude anyway? Michelle, Vicki and Kendall would probably have no issue, but what about the other girls?

(02-02-2022 20:55 )Norman Beige Wrote:  

(02-02-2022 15:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote:  

(29-01-2022 23:13 )mrmann Wrote:  Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.

I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude. Unless you're going to frequently pay lots of money to watch on a 'perv cam', you'll be deprived the glorious sight of Maria Smith, Michelle Moist and many others lying back on the bed with their legs spread wide apart teasing their fingers around their crotch. Of course they're wearing tiny panties (even doubled up sometimes), but for me that's a much better sight than the totally naked girls on Babestation, where the camera rarely shows all their body or they're partly hidden by the onscreen graphics.

Perhaps because I like the sight of a woman clad in sexy lingerie far more than a woman totally nude (I still get off on the tease and suggestion) it might make my argument a bit biased. But I think we still see far more of the girls bodies on Xpanded than on Babestation. And you only have to see how that channel is currently faring now it's pretty much all cam shows.

And of course who's to say if all the girls want to go fully nude anyway? Michelle, Vicki and Kendall would probably have no issue, but what about the other girls?

Here here, the gospel according to xpanded.

(02-02-2022 15:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote:  

(29-01-2022 23:13 )mrmann Wrote:  Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.

I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude.

(02-02-2022 22:03 )Doddle Wrote:  

(02-02-2022 15:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote:  

(29-01-2022 23:13 )mrmann Wrote:  Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.

I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude.

To give Mr Mann his due, he says this about every channel