The UK Babe Channels Forum
Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - daveypics - 21-05-2016 13:22

(20-05-2016 21:48 )mrmann Wrote:  Anyone else just begging for even the smallest relaxation of the rules on these channels?

Some girls are just more risky than other.....some will get naked or tease and give flashes of the gateway to heaven....Kerrie Lee, Alice Goodman, Jenny....to name 3 of the best. Others are just not willing to get naked and risk anything.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ryuken - 22-05-2016 05:50

I wish one of the channels would sign Demi Rose Mawby to host a daytime show.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Ferntickler77 - 22-05-2016 14:12

Why the feck do babestation/lads lounge have the sexy Terri Hawkes sitting on a desk with legs and feet to die for, then cut most of them off screen with info?


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ryuken - 03-06-2016 23:07

S66's new futuristic set actually looks half decent. It looks like it easily allows a presenter to host a show standing up, sitting down or in various other positions.

It appears that if shows are filmed from a specific angle, they could comfortably film a show with more than 1 host without awkwardly cramming them onto a bed set.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ryuken - 04-06-2016 09:19

I'd love to see Kandi Kay, Brooke Lea, Clare Richards and Sophia Lares host a night show together on S66's new set


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 05-06-2016 23:20

Outfits appropriate to the set.
Is that too much to ask?
Obviously it is Rolleyes.

Some of the outfit choices are so repetitious and dull.
And a lot of them have no relevance to the set whatsoever.

More evidence to my mind of a complete lack of imagination, effort and thought going into the nightshows.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 06-06-2016 21:08

Smile ^ I don't disagree with the sentiment - I just wonder how much control any of the performers have on what sets they are put in ?

The few times you see someone in a specific outfit tailored to the set suggests to me that they've possibly requested it in advance (and have the clout to do so) because they notice they get more calls with certain outfits or maybe the producers request certain outfit/set combos based on past call volumes. But that that sort of thing generally happens at the "top" of the show ? and thereafter they're just bunged where they're told to go.

I just can't see it being so organised that babes are given "running orders" in advance and are told precisely which sets they are going to be on. I don't think that would work anyway, there's got to be an element of improvisation to switch things around in response to how the phones are going ?

I'm guessing the best the babes could hope for is they're told : "We're digging out the hospital set again next week" or "Bring your dominatrix gear out for the alley set" or something like that ?

It's not an excuse for the babes just throwing a bunch of general purpose lingerie into a suitcase and not giving a thought to it; but I'm not surprised really that they don't go overboard in trying to match outfit to set. Most of the BS sets are getting pretty stale and characterless anyway, they've been kicking around for nearly 3 years; they need a bit of a revamp imo.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 06-06-2016 21:55

(06-06-2016 21:08 )M-L-L Wrote:  Most of the BS sets are getting pretty stale and characterless anyway, they've been kicking around for nearly 3 years; they need a bit of a revamp imo.

I agree with a lot of your post M-L-L but especially the above part.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 10-06-2016 10:41

We seem to be seeing a lot of old faces reappear on the shows just recently, is this yet another tell-tale sign of the channels struggling to recruit new girls?
Obviously this has its pros and cons, but it just seems to me like it's currently outweighing the steady stream of new faces that should be coming through.
One of the best things in the past about these shows was seeing who they could rustle up next from the Glamour industry, but now it seems like we are stuck with a particular group of girls that just rotate around the channels.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ryuken - 10-06-2016 23:04

S66 have the potential to create a really interesting "fan interaction/Q&A" chat show with Reed Amber as the host, based on her Intimate Interview youtube and snapchat videos. She really has a fun and filthy connection with all the S66 presenters.

I'd love to see more of Reed in front of the camera. So I really hope S66 give her a night time segment where various presenters can lighten up and show off their personalities more.

Reed's show could end with each guest doing a G/G striptease that fans vote for the outfits and setting of their choice, with the video then being unrestricted by OFCOM rules and available to buy.

Hopefully Sophia, Kandi, Brooke and Fernanda would be Reed's first guests, I'd love to buy and 4 girl orgy video with them all dressed as cheerleaders, schoolgirls, nurses or secretaries, with loads of kissing and nipple sucking.