Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - OurJud - 21-08-2016 19:40 (21-08-2016 19:11 )Block Wrote: There has been no new ofcunt rules. I didn't suggest there has been. That's why I used the term 'loophole'. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Block - 21-08-2016 19:56 Yes sir, i know what you said. There is no rule change, loop hole or any way you want to describe it. It has always been how the channels want to interpret ofcunt's rules. What outfits can the girls wear, is touching another girl allowed etc. In the recent past BS has been more liberal on the nights and S66 on the days. S66 developed the perv cam, however i think BS are now deploying it it to a better level. Is it good for the channels? Yes as long as they don't disregard the TV watchers. There should be periods of time devoted to TV viewers. Also time devoted to perv cam. At the moment the time isn't balanced. RE: Ofcom Discussion - OurJud - 21-08-2016 20:12 (21-08-2016 19:56 )Block Wrote: Is it good for the channels? We'll have to AtD. I think they're great for the channels and the more pervcam action the better. I've never been one for viewer interaction - I only care what they get up to, and they get up to a damn site more when using the pervcams. RE: Ofcom Discussion - hatessexistofcon - 23-08-2016 00:06 I remember the fines these channels got, we all do, yet the other normal daytime channels break rules and they don't get fined just a slapped bottom,if that.= double standards. Here is the most recent ; http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/the-jeremy-kyle-show-ofcom-complaints-ruling-sex-swearing_uk_57baf2f8e4b042aee74cb6b0 RE: Ofcom Discussion - derekdas - 23-08-2016 14:35 (21-08-2016 20:12 )OurJud Wrote: [quote='Block' pid='1928606' dateline='1471809385'] We'll have to AtD. I think they're great for the channels and the more pervcam action the better. I've never been one for viewer interaction - I only care what they get up to, and they get up to a damn site more when using the perv cam. (quote ) Unless the cameraman is caught unawares,usually you see very little of the action. In fact, if a punter comes on, the girls are notified straight away and the perv cam is moved into a good position, with the camera panning away. You're left with just head and shoulders. I'd rather pay for a 5 min.phone call and be able to see the babe and interact with her, than pay an extortionate amount of money to just see a close up of her fanny. RE: Ofcom Discussion - OurJud - 23-08-2016 16:41 (23-08-2016 14:35 )derekdas Wrote: Unless the cameraman is caught unawares,usually you see very little of the action. In fact, if a punter comes on, the girls are notified straight away and the perv cam is moved into a good position, with the camera panning away. That might be the case now with Babestation's shit new OSG, but it wasn't with the original. The original OSG had a good sized gap right at the bottom, just where the girls used to sit with their legs spread for the pervcam. RE: Ofcom Discussion - papahet3969 - 23-08-2016 17:25 is it me or do s66 babes seem more adept with pervecam and use them better for the good of all compared to some on BS ?? RE: Ofcom Discussion - HEX!T - 24-08-2016 14:39 dunno about better but your much less likely to get scammed with s66. RE: Ofcom Discussion - OurJud - 24-08-2016 16:37 (23-08-2016 17:25 )papahet3969 Wrote: is it me or do s66 babes seem more adept with pervecam and use them better for the good of all compared to some on BS ?? They might be slightly more adept, but they're not as blatant as BS. It's just like they're saying, "Ha! Look what we're doing Ofcom, and you know there's not a single thing you can do about it!" RE: Ofcom Discussion - winsaw - 11-12-2016 12:12 in the latest ofcom investigation notice the are 2 babe shows, first bs are now under investigation for something that happened on meet the babes on 28/10 and 66 where looked into but not forwarded to investigation for misleading the viewer on 1/11, wonder if someone has finally complained the show wasn't adult |