+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Sin TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=347)
+---- Thread: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=63996)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 12-07-2015 21:13
Things looking up for tonight Kimmy haze on
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 12-07-2015 21:13
(12-07-2015 20:38 )winsaw Wrote: What they have done is wrong but if they do close that's a lot of girls and others out of work and out of pocket, not everyone can just walk into another channel, so I would say doing what they are doing is the best thing for the majority
spot on winsaw, it's wrong what sin have done but it's the best thing for the majority and keeps sin on the air. if sin keep going as they are doing since they've come back then I am very hopeful they will survive. Beth must think they will, otherwise she would not have joined sin
as for if there is a nightshow tonight....yes there is
at the moment it's just Kimmy Haze
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - TURNIPHEAD - 12-07-2015 21:38
You can believe some of the girls because I had met a babeshow girl at the start of Sin Tv who told me that she had turned down their offer of £800 a night because she did not like the people running this channel and had doubts about the longevity of the channel . I was was the first person to post details of these high wages. The girls talk among themselves in person and on their private phones and she advised me that this was the going rate offered to all of the girls when they signed up such an array of top girls when Sin TV started
Winsaw has also posted something similar from his contacts with the girls
On a brighter note yes Sin/Sky TV has improved since they got rid of the 3 girls at a time on the sardine TV screen
They need to sign up more girls albeit on reduced wages as it is boring with the same few girls night after night
However with Sin TV`s previous track record of not paying their wages in full they may well find it difficult in signing new girls
Perhaps they should concentrate on signing up fresh talent that has not previously been seen on any of the babeshows as they will be looking for their big break in the Glamour/Sex industry
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - SecretAgent - 12-07-2015 22:10
The problems hit them around quarter end. May be a coincidence but commercial property rents are usually payable then. If they do rent and are on quarterly terms the next big crunch time will be end of September. The girls are probably self employed so don't I believe get covered by employment law protection and if they want unpaid fees will have to issue legal proceedings. If I were them I would. I doubt any supplier is giving them credit terms now so its going to be a tightrope they have to tread if they are to rebuild and survive
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 12-07-2015 22:15
will agree with you here turniphead. sintv now rather than concentrate on veteran babeshow babes need to start concentrating on unknown/fresh talent who as you say are looking for their break in the glamour/adult industry. they would be cheaper than the veteran babes they have signed, but do need to keep veteran babes as they can bring in the calls whilst the unknown babes get established and start building up a fan base.
also agree about believing some of the babes too as I was told about what was going on behind the scenes by someone conncected to sin which tallied with what was posted on here
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - bigglesworth - 12-07-2015 22:37
(12-07-2015 21:38 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote: I was was the first person to post details of these high wages.
I flagged their high wagebill as being a problem as early as March, even if I didn't mention any specific figure.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 12-07-2015 22:37
New & unknown girls won't justify the high call charges they are currently asking.
They started out looking like a luxury outfit, but their sheen has been well washed away by their inept handling of no-shows, pretend web-site maintenance problems (so they don't need to justify not using the x-streams or let us see what a mismatch there is between their roster page and who is actually on any more), and silence on their usually busy twitter account when they want to brush things under the carpet.
Any girl going there now does so at her own risk,
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - TURNIPHEAD - 12-07-2015 22:40
(12-07-2015 22:37 )bigglesworth Wrote:(12-07-2015 21:38 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote: I was was the first person to post details of these high wages.
I flagged their high wagebill as being a problem as early as March, even if I didn't mention any specific figure.
Was that because you did not know they were being offered (not paid ) £800 a night
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - bigglesworth - 12-07-2015 22:46
(12-07-2015 22:40 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote: Was that because you did not know they were being offered (not paid ) £800 a night
Yes. I had been told it was "a giddy amount" but didn't know the specific figure.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - TURNIPHEAD - 13-07-2015 00:28
What the fuck is up with the system tonight as I have had to delete 2 posts as it keeps changing Rampant to Rampart