+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity (/showthread.php?tid=28022)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - continental19 - 18-11-2011 01:17
Ofcom are an overpaid modern day Dictatorship, who don't give a shit about are rights. They are only out for themselves, eventually Ofcom will fall, the likes of them will always do. I just hope when they are finished, that our Babe channels haven't gone down with them.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - StanTheMan - 18-11-2011 01:24
Our time will come. We can now see any of the video nasties that Graham Bright and his troop were so determined to get destroyed (literally, I mean... in a giant furnace, in fact), so there's no reason to think the same won't happen with the babeshows.
They may have won the battle, but they will never win the war.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - continental19 - 18-11-2011 01:26
Right on Stan, power to the people.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - continental19 - 18-11-2011 02:10
Well I'm sitting watching in my opinion 2 of the hottest babes we have at present Danni Harwood and Lucy Summers, and I'm thinking to myself, these to babes are not allowed to interact with each other, they can't show there pussies and they can't even touch themselves anymore, all this in the so called modern 21st century??
To think, I like all of you, are Taxpayers and yet we're not even allowed to enjoy Beautiful sexy ladies on our TV screens, now if we all were living in a Socialist communist Regime then I would fully understand it, but we're not, instead we are meant to be living in one of the worlds oldest democracies, which allows us to have free speech, protest etc etc.
Yet the way Ofcom are running things at the moment, they would have fitted in rather nicely in a socialist country.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - eccles - 19-11-2011 00:51
Sadly there is a massive democratic deficit in this country, and it is linked to Ofcoms unchallenged power.
In most areas the leading party has a selection committee of 4-12 people who shortlist about 4 candidates for prospective MP. The local party might have 200 members who get to select one candidate from the 4. In some parties the process is handled by a regional party manager. All candidates have to be approved by the central party. The public then get to vote between 3 vaguely credible parties. In 3/4 of the country one party is pretty well guaranteed to win.
What this means is that in 3/4 of the country a handful of people have the power to throw out anyone outspoken, controversial or with a personality. No opinion is far safer than any opinion.
Even sitting MPs get kicked out, look at Bob Mellish.
The public dont get a real choice.
An MP can be morally right but deselected because they are seen as a risk. A very few are so secure or close enough to retirement not to care, otherwise something wont get political support until it has a bandwaggon behind it. The focus groups dont rate it. Newspapers, commentators, comedians can be more flexible.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - jimmyt73 - 19-11-2011 14:50
hi guys did anyone see the program on sky arts yesterday morning about a photographer who was taking pics of completely naked people which showed not just one but hundreds of people naked and was broadcast at 10.00 AM,which leads me to question ofcoms current policy on day and nighttime viewing as a whole.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - continental19 - 19-11-2011 15:06
I no what show you're talking about Jimmy, the question you have posed is spot on, to me it shows that Ofcom truly haven't a clue what to regulate and what not to regulate, yet they have a bee in there bonnet concerning Adult channels which are specificly put in SKY'S EPG starting at channel 900. So my question is what's the problem? If Ofcom are happy enough to show nudity during daytime hours why should they kick up a stink about babes showing there boobs after 9pm? and then say you can't go nude till 11pm? There is no logic to any of it!!
It's clearly the blind leading the blind at Ofcom. In my opinion After the 9pm watershed they should allow the babes to get there boobs out, then from 10 pm go nude, then go full frontal nude from 11pm onwards, and what's the harm it is causing? Absolutely NOTHING!!
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - skully - 19-11-2011 15:34
Spencer Tunicks, Naked in Mexico was an art project, art shows aren't 'mainstream' and shouldn't be regulated or censored, so you can't compare them to babe shows.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - continental19 - 19-11-2011 15:35
(19-11-2011 15:34 )skully Wrote: Spencer Tunicks, Naked in Mexico was an art project, art shows aren't 'mainstream' and shouldn't be regulated or censored, so you can't compare them to babe shows.
Point taken
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - shankey! - 19-11-2011 15:42
something i cant understand about the channels ,if the girls are not allowed to touch each other or themselves can this not be recognised as not a babe show any more but more like art?if so then they should be allowed to be naked!