The UK Babe Channels Forum
Bangbabes - Discussion Thread - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bang Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Thread: Bangbabes - Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=7494)



RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Charlemagne - 29-05-2010 07:05

I've been very critical of Bangbabes recently
But they won the battle of the channels last night

There new set is a great idea
Changing Room

It's not so much the fact that the girls strip down to their bare essential but the fine use of a close up camera

I watched the Donna and Emily sets... never seen them look so sexy

So last night it was BANGBABES -1 , ELITE -0,


RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Rammyrascal - 29-05-2010 08:11

id call it a draw between babestation and elite last night both channels were as good as each other last night

for me bangbabes 1 elitetv 1


RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - tsurugi - 29-05-2010 13:47

(29-05-2010 08:11 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  id call it a draw between babestation and elite last night both channels were as good as each other last night

for me bangbabes 1 elitetv 1

That really does not say to much for elite and the danica/alice supershowRolleyes

Personally i find bangbabes pretty unwatchable at the moment its almost as bad as babestation.


RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Robot Devil - 29-05-2010 13:55

(29-05-2010 13:47 )tsurugi Wrote:  Personally i find bangbabes pretty unwatchable at the moment its almost as bad as babestation.

and why ? it could be that bangbabes just seems like a babestation affiliate now. for me there are only two people that can save bangbabes now- emma spellar and gemma hiles. get them on nights and bangbabes' popularity will skyrocket


RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - irishtender - 29-05-2010 13:57

(29-05-2010 13:55 )Freebird Wrote:  
(29-05-2010 13:47 )tsurugi Wrote:  Personally i find bangbabes pretty unwatchable at the moment its almost as bad as babestation.

and why ? it could be that bangbabes just seems like a babestation affiliate now. for me there are only two people that can save bangbabes now- emma spellar and gemma hiles. get them on nights and bangbabes' popularity will skyrocket

that's exactly what i was thinking! Tongue


RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Chilly - 29-05-2010 14:07

Dionne wearing see-through knickers, Lori getting to do her thing on a decent channel, Jemma Jey getting down and dirty again, erm, what else is there? Oh, Annie and Tori's amazin' rears, hmmm, I guess that's some of the reasons I'm still Lovin' Bang Babes. Wink


RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - irishtender - 29-05-2010 14:10

it's just they have been around for so long, all beautiful women and great performers, just i'd like to see some new girls, that's all Tongue


RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Robot Devil - 29-05-2010 14:13

(29-05-2010 14:07 )Chilly Wrote:  Dionne wearing see-through knickers, Lori getting to do her thing on a decent channel, Jemma Jey getting down and dirty again, erm, what else is there? Oh, Annie and Tori's amazin' rears, hmmm, I guess that's some of the reasons I'm still Lovin' Bang Babes. Wink

but, wise old chilly, lori isn't doing her thing. she's being kept from doing her thing by the beurocrats that run BB. can you honestly say her shows on BB are better than when she was on BS ?


RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Chilly - 29-05-2010 14:13

@ irishtender. Wish granted. Wink

http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=20397


RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Chilly - 29-05-2010 14:18

(29-05-2010 14:13 )Freebird Wrote:  but, wise old chilly, lori isn't doing her thing. she's being kept from doing her thing by the beurocrats that run BB. can you honestly say her shows on BB are better than when she was on BS ?

Fair enough. I guess her thing on Babestation was indeed going naked all the time. To be honest, I actually prefer seeing her wear skimpy thongs. Blush