The UK Babe Channels Forum
Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Liverred - 12-11-2016 00:29

Despite the talent that's on tonight, despite having switched between Dannii, Clare and Olivia since 10 o'clock I haven't seen anything to get excited about tonight. Yet again.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ryuken - 12-11-2016 17:10

After seeing the BS mannequin challenge starring Priya Young, Dannii Harwood, Olivia Berzinc, Alice Goodwin and Ashley Emma.

I have to say that Ashley has overtaken Clare Richards, in regards to who has the best arse on TV.

I'd love to tie Ashley up as a slave and spank her arse with a whip.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 12-11-2016 17:14

Producers 1 babes 0

it's basically all over. The shows have too much structure and to many stupid games with rules that are not sexy to watch. Plus perv cam


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - GloryLori - 12-11-2016 17:19

(12-11-2016 17:14 )broncobilly1234 Wrote:  Producers 1 babes 0

it's basically all over. The shows have too much structure and to many stupid games with rules that are not sexy to watch.

That is exactly what I was thinking, sad really Sad


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 13-11-2016 01:28

The shows are too predictable now unfortunately.
There is painfully little to visually stimulate.

It isn't merely just same old babes in the same old outfits in the same old boring sets doing the same old moves time and again although all that by itself is enough to leave me utterly disheartened and bored senseless.

It is also that channels have become too predictable with running orders and pecking orders.
The same tired routines played out remorselessly.

The shows have become riddled with ridiculously high call costs, gimmicks, unimaginative camerawork, poor lighting, lack of ambition and pervcam getting in the way of television nightshow product being as effective as it could and arguably should be.

The quality of visual product is at all time low.
The cost of interaction with the babes in whatever form is at an all time high as is the capacity and desire to rip off punters left, right and centre.
To cap it all the impression I get is that callers are seen as sad lonely perverts with nothing better to spend their time or money on while non callers are designated as freeloaders. What a thoroughly miserable situationHuhHuhHuh.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Jay1 - 13-11-2016 02:30

I'm going to be radical here. I watch a babe to wank over her. I don't watch any babe show for any other reason. Performance? I'm no Quentin Crisp or Melvyn Bragg. Sitting for hours watching a show to commentate on a stint? I realise some of you like to analyse and dissect performances but I just don't get it. Stop trying to turn wanking into an art form.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rake - 13-11-2016 09:22

Jay1 - I think there are some on here who are unemployed and on benefits, or are wealthy, and have odd interests, so fill their time analysing every show.

Having said that even for a casual onanist, there is merit in discussing the quality of the material on offer to us to wank over.

I have noticed that it has got boring and stale in the last month or 2 across the channels. Things were looking good for the first 6 months of the year, but for some reason have never recovered from the summer schoool holiday crackdown. Some key points:

- same repetitive rosters of often identikit girls; S66 are the worst for this, having many long stints when, for example, there are 3 or even 4 blondes all dressed similarly.The same old, same old girls.
- unimaginative poses and lack of movement, especially on days. Don't tell me the rules cause this, most of what I see is sheer laziness. Girls laying front down, tits buried in the duvet, texting on their mobiles for hours.
- unimaginative outfits

I am sure someone will be along shortly to say all is well because they must be making the call stats or they wouldn't be doing this.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ryuken - 13-11-2016 11:34

(13-11-2016 02:30 )Jay1 Wrote:  I'm going to be radical here. I watch a babe to wank over her. I don't watch any babe show for any other reason. Performance? I'm no Quentin Crisp or Melvyn Bragg. Sitting for hours watching a show to commentate on a stint? I realise some of you like to analyse and dissect performances but I just don't get it. Stop trying to turn wanking into an art form.

I know exactly what you mean, but I only tend to give credit to a hosts performance, when they don't stay static in one position (e.g. laid on their stomach on a bed or sitting in a chair) for 8 hours playing with their phone.

I want to see as much tits and arse as possible.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ryuken - 13-11-2016 12:16

Pure speculation, but I wouldn't be surprised if the producers on all channels make exceptions for some hosts with awful call stats.

For example I really think Caty Cole, Becky Roberts, Cara Brett, Mikaela Witt, Anastasia Harris, Fernanda Ferrari and Sophia Lares were more deserving of a week of celebration before Mikayla Bayliss.


RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - terence - 13-11-2016 12:18

^you're right, it's more like promotion than reward.