+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bang Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Thread: Bangbabes - Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=7494)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - irishtender - 29-05-2010 14:23
(29-05-2010 14:13 )Chilly Wrote: @ irishtender. Wish granted.
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=20397
yeah but will she be appearing on the babechannels 912 and so on?
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Robot Devil - 29-05-2010 14:24
i do know what you mean about that actually- definitely allows for more movement instead of being face down on on her back with her legs constantly covering certain areas. just seems a shame we don't even have the option of seeing her naked now
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - tsurugi - 29-05-2010 14:45
(29-05-2010 13:55 )Freebird Wrote:(29-05-2010 13:47 )tsurugi Wrote: Personally i find bangbabes pretty unwatchable at the moment its almost as bad as babestation.
and why ? it could be that bangbabes just seems like a babestation affiliate now. for me there are only two people that can save bangbabes now- emma spellar and gemma hiles. get them on nights and bangbabes' popularity will skyrocket
Seeing as gemma will be off to pastures new in july i wouldn't get my hopes up about that.
I would say only tori,annie and maybe emily at a stretch are the only girls on their current roster that do anything for me. I just find it the same old same old night after night....and don't get me started on the load music that scares the shit out of my dog on a daily basis
The naked all the time thing is one of the reasons camilla can't even get me to watch BS, too many girls just lie there in the same position all night, they should ask caty for lessons when it comes to the being naked and entertaining at the same time.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - TheWatcher - 29-05-2010 14:50
Rarely watch it anymore.
Its all become pretty boring since Amanda left.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Chilly - 29-05-2010 14:57
D'oh! Should've mentioned Jet, who is also doing a sterling job since her return. It'll be interesting to see if Bluebird allow Amanda to show her gash as much as she did on Bang Babes.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - broncobilly10 - 30-05-2010 13:58
(29-05-2010 14:57 )Chilly Wrote: D'oh! Should've mentioned Jet, who is also doing a sterling job since her return. It'll be interesting to see if Bluebird allow Amanda to show her gash as much as she did on Bang Babes.
bangbabes has the best girls from babestation so overall it is better but they do need to stop being so heavy with the adverts its too much.
i liked the changing room idea one thing i used to love about babecast was the different sets, the shows got a bit safe for awhile with only doing one girl on a bed thing, hope we see more new things along the way
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - speedybert - 01-06-2010 21:03
(29-05-2010 14:45 )tsurugi Wrote:(29-05-2010 13:55 )Freebird Wrote: [quote='tsurugi' pid='530204' dateline='1275140837']
Personally i find bangbabes pretty unwatchable at the moment its almost as bad as babestation.
Seeing as gemma will be off to pastures new in july i wouldn't get my hopes up about that.
I would say only tori,annie and maybe emily at a stretch are the only girls on their current roster that do anything for me. I just find it the same old same old night after night....and don't get me started on the load music that scares the shit out of my dog on a daily basis
The naked all the time thing is one of the reasons camilla can't even get me to watch BS, too many girls just lie there in the same position all night, they should ask caty for lessons when it comes to the being naked and entertaining at the same time.
Good point tsu
Almost all the girls on BB are ex BS now (or even ex ex BB!!)
Tori has apparently jumped on the Bluebird gravy train as well.
Much as though I like the girls to get it all off most of them end up in one position on the bed(a la Babeworld)The most enterprising naked performer is probably juicy Lucy on Sport XXX.
960s "top down" camera angles make for some interesting viewing especially if you like Chelsea French(who is also Bluebird bound)
I long for the BB dream team of Vikki V,Precious,Emily Dean,Victoria
Now that's what I call a babeshow..............
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - amandasnumerounofan - 02-06-2010 23:11
I have to agree with you both because Bangmedia don't seem to be bothered anymore and if they don't up their game before BluebirdTV launches, then they will go the way of the dinosaurs. Again tonight they've only got 3 girls to cover 4 channels. Either recruit more or bring some daytime girls on to nights properly.
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Charlemagne - 04-06-2010 23:23
Theme night on Bangbabes
Tonight all the girls are holding a Babestation reunion night.
Because all four of tonights babes worked there last year
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - amandasnumerounofan - 05-06-2010 02:21
So Bangmedias solution to 3 girls on 4 channels is to have them move to daytime (where there isn't a shortage) and not to replace them with new/daytime girls. That seems like suicide to me.