+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Sin TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=347)
+---- Thread: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=63996)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - marlowe - 17-07-2015 22:52
(17-07-2015 22:10 )bigglesworth Wrote: I said at the start that they didn't have a viable business
You were right. Consider that they were paying much higher wages than Babestation - this is the Babestation that has 3 high EPG slots on Sky and 3 freeview channels to generate calls. Sin TV had just the one EPG slot and a low one at that. How could they ever have managed?
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - gunnar - 17-07-2015 23:05
^They probably had someone with a decent wad of cash who woke up one morning and decided it would be a great idea to run a babechannel. Nothing else can really explain the mess they have made.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - tjl007 - 17-07-2015 23:15
Some of the girls have been tweeting that they are owed a lot of money and can't believe that people were still working for them for free
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - De La Red - 17-07-2015 23:19
What a disgraceful and embarrassing way to attempt to run a business. For those reasons, good riddance Sin.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 17-07-2015 23:19
With hindsight the girls made hardly their wisest move ever by signing up with this shower did they? If Mellie D could see it almost straight away, why couldn't they? I guess a few were trapped by the time they realised the score. Some who stuck around when they should have known better look even more culpable in their own fate. But I suppose it's easy to judge from the outside without the full facts...
That said, there remains is a whiff of delight in Sin's downfall around here that is unappealing IMO. These are people's livelihoods. That is not to be casually dismissed.
Does anyone think that Sin set out with the intention not to pay people?!
IMO, the only ones that come out of this smelling of roses are those that were offered work with Sin and knew "too good to be true" when they heard it.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - De La Red - 17-07-2015 23:26
(17-07-2015 23:19 )ShandyHand Wrote: With hindsight the girls made hardly their wisest move ever by signing up with this shower did they? If Mellie D could see it almost straight away, why couldn't they? I guess a few were trapped by the time they realised the score. Some who stuck around when they should have known better look even more culpable in their own fate. But I suppose it's easy to judge from the outside without the full facts...
That said, there remains is a whiff of delight in Sin's downfall around here that is unappealing IMO. These are people's livelihoods. That is not to be casually dismissed.
Does anyone think that Sin set out with the intention not to pay people?!
IMO, the only ones that come out of this smelling of roses are those that were offered work with Sin and knew "too good to be true" when they heard it.
It's difficult. Whilst we all welcome competition in terms of channels and what they are offering, it is horrible seeing people being taken advantage of and being ripped off.
I get the impression of the 'I told you so' crowd in the thread, and you are always going to get that. If Sin have gone for the reasons that they are a poorly run business with alleged questionable ethics/intentions, then I am glad to see them go as quickly as they got here, in order that the damage they do is limited.
I am sure girls joined with the best of intentions, with whatever they were being pitched with. If anyone was going to be offered a 33% increase ( a figure I have juct plucked out of thin air) to do effectively the same job elsewhere, we will all be moving on, and we do it in good faith.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - gunnar - 17-07-2015 23:32
(17-07-2015 23:15 )tjl007 Wrote: Some of the girls have been tweeting that they are owed a lot of money and can't believe that people were still working for them for free
^The following saying comes to mind.
"You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time."
I think the Babes that Sin TV got working for them, were initially attracted by the promise of very high wages and this had them flocking to be a part of the channel. This however proved to be illusory in nature.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Regenerated - 18-07-2015 00:27
This channel is proving to be one of the biggest disasters in the entire history of these babe shows. No thought, no plan (or if there was it was a doomed failure from the start) and then no back-up plan when the inevitable happened and the whole sorry show went down the tubes.
They deserve to be taken to the cleaners for the money they apparently owe to staff and babes. What a joke - and sadly for many not a very funny one.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - admiral decker - 18-07-2015 01:03
(17-07-2015 23:26 )De La Red Wrote: alleged questionable ethics/intentions
They didn't have any questionable ethics/intentions. That kind of talk is nonsense. They simply didn't know what they were doing.
As bigglesworth posted, Sin TV had just the one EPG slot and a low one at that, so how could they ever have managed to pay such a high wagebill? The answer must be that they thought the x-streams would bring calls rolling in, and that was obviously a horrendous error of judgement.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Lamarr l 21 l - 18-07-2015 01:33
Lets hope Arsenal snap up all these babes leaving and use them as cheerleaders
