Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 |
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 30-12-2016 22:53 (30-12-2016 21:02 )ryuken Wrote: Given that most presenters were glamour models and strippers prior to working for the channels. In a lot of cases I suspect it's a case of unwilling rather than unable . After all don't want to be serving those pesky 'freeloaders' do they? RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - pigeonseatsick - 31-12-2016 07:41 These women obviously don't receive any training, which would account for their wildly variable performances. It seems they are told what not to do, which imprisons the imagination. Spontaneity is all well and good but not if you lack the ability to work within the restraints you are given. Training can impart confidence and pride because your performance is now measurable. Instead of this laissez-faire, commes si comme sa attitude being spewed out nightly. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rake - 31-12-2016 11:03 Jasmine Webb recently burst on to the scene with her first couple of shows that blew other established babes into the weeds. Then, guess what, the producers got frightened, reigned her in, and made her perform to much stricter guidelines. Hey Presto the life was sucked out of her few subsequent shows. She has never been seen again. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - shankey! - 31-12-2016 12:03 its a completely new channel whats needed to breath some fresh air back on our screens,the ones were left with have stagnated for the majority of the past 12 months, there has been a few highlights with the likes of new girls coming in, most notably nicole snow ,but a bit more competition would make them buck up and take notice RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Bondless - 31-12-2016 12:19 (31-12-2016 12:03 )shankey! Wrote: its a completely new channel whats needed to breath some fresh air back on our screens,the ones were left with have stagnated for the majority of the past 12 months, there has been a few highlights with the likes of new girls coming in, most notably nicole snow ,but a bit more competition would make them buck up and take notice I think you're right but it seems to be hard for startups - remember She Bang, Sin TV and iBabeTV? (they were mainly web only though if I remember correctly) RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Robot Devil - 31-12-2016 13:08 ^The problem is that a new channel would just hire the same old faces that have clogged up the babe channels for years. A new channel really wouldn't have any effect. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 31-12-2016 13:46 im with robot devil a new channel would serve fuck all the babe channels need to be disrupted with a decent digital channel that does what the channels do but better and cheaper the channels dont want to change because they dont have to change they have got fat and bloated and totally indifferent to ideas of customer service RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 31-12-2016 16:15 (31-12-2016 11:03 )Rake Wrote: Jasmine Webb recently burst on to the scene with her first couple of shows that blew other established babes into the weeds. Jasmine Webb hasn't been seen again because she's been in the USA since late October/early November. A new channel won't shake things up, sintv did try but only lasted a few months plus any new channel would hire proven babeshow babes that they know will bring in the calls right away. but RLC seems to be finally returning to Tv in February from Denni Tayla's twitter as her twitter profile pic has the RLC logo & Feb 2017 on it and a tweet said "Tv shows being planned". If that is the case, could shake things up RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - skully - 31-12-2016 16:27 I don't think RLC's return to tv will necessarily shake things up, but it will be a welcome return. RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 31-12-2016 19:05 Would any of the girls who worked there actually risk going back im not to sure I think any version of RLC would be like the World of Sport Wrestling just watched a poor shoddy version of the real thing |