+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - greenray - 01-01-2017 14:49
I wonder what the training is like on Xpanded? The cheapness of the calls means the volumes are higher,so the babes are dealing with more punters,hopefully building up their experience. And although their turnover is high,many of their ex babes are flourishing elsewhere.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Charlemagne - 01-01-2017 15:07
You have to ask the question, 'Do the babes get paid too much' ?
The babes get lots of publicity from the shows. From this fan base that they establish, it makes their earning ability from web streaming / magazines / websites / merchandise.
Or do you have to pay the top wages to get the best girls
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Rake - 01-01-2017 15:11
(01-01-2017 14:46 )KerrAvon Wrote: Some babes just have the natural gift in front of the camera & some don't. Don't think any training, outside instructions on what a babe can or cannot do, will have any real impact. Most get by just on looks or how good they are on the phone.
The more veteren performers had the advantage of establishing their fanbases in the good old days of the channels letting them perform really hot shows. No pervcam too. The newer babes have it more harder now, with all the restrictions now.
I agree that there are those that are naturals, but there are only a few with such talent from the outset. Guidance and training in both visual skills (posing, positioning, movement, expression) and phone/mic would help those that are not the finished article.
Even Messi and Ronaldo train and receive coaching. I too have trained mistresses over the years to dress, comport and behave more erotically, with excellent results.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 01-01-2017 15:12
(01-01-2017 14:46 )KerrAvon Wrote: Some babes just have the natural gift in front of the camera & some don't. Don't think any training, outside instructions on what a babe can or cannot do, will have any real impact. Most get by just on looks or how good they are on the phone.
Yes I tend to agree with that.
On screen presence, natural horniness and eroticism are not things that can be taught easily imo. I suspect a lot of it is down to self confidence.
When the confidence grows the ambition levels go up as does the instinctive horniness. For some babes it is a longer process than others.
Of course knowing the rules in terms of what can and can't be done is important but to engage the viewer enough to want to call (from my perspective at least) there needs to be something in my head that says 'Ooh yeah she looks well up for it' or 'Mmmmm I think I can encourage her to be very naughty'.
For me that comes primarily through the babe genuinely enjoying what she is doing rather than looking distant and miserable. If a babe just sits or lies down with a relatively gormless facial expression then it feels about as horny as two turds in a toilet. If on the other hand they are oozing confidence, enthusiasm and looking fearfully horny and ready to rock it really shows.
That magic is either there naturally or it isn't but it is confidence levels that determine that natural filth that can manifest the most memorable stints imo.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - KerrAvon - 01-01-2017 16:00
(01-01-2017 15:12 )snookered147 Wrote: That magic is either there naturally or it isn't but it is confidence levels that determine that natural filth that can manifest the most memorable stints.
Got a point there about confidence. Lola Knight comes to my mind, from the rather shy girl on Xpanded to oozing confidence now on S66.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 01-01-2017 16:42
(01-01-2017 15:12 )snookered147 Wrote:(01-01-2017 14:46 )KerrAvon Wrote: Some babes just have the natural gift in front of the camera & some don't. Don't think any training, outside instructions on what a babe can or cannot do, will have any real impact. Most get by just on looks or how good they are on the phone.
Yes I tend to agree with that.
On screen presence, natural horniness and eroticism are not things that can be taught easily imo. I suspect a lot of it is down to self confidence.
When the confidence grows the ambition levels go up as does the instinctive horniness. For some babes it is a longer process than others.
Of course knowing the rules in terms of what can and can't be done is important but to engage the viewer enough to want to call (from my perspective at least) there needs to be something in my head that says 'Ooh yeah she looks well up for it' or 'Mmmmm I think I can encourage her to be very naughty'.
For me that comes primarily through the babe genuinely enjoying what she is doing rather than looking distant and miserable. If a babe just sits or lies down with a relatively gormless facial expression then it feels about as horny as two turds in a toilet. If on the other hand they are oozing confidence, enthusiasm and looking fearfully horny and ready to rock it really shows.
That magic is either there naturally or it isn't but it is confidence levels that determine that natural filth that can manifest the most memorable stints imo.
This is all very true but there is a question of how that confidence can be nurtured in some during the vital formative shows. A babe's make or break moments are often contained in those first three or four shows for me. She either convinces the screen that she has what it takes to stick around or she doesn't. More help couldn't fail to help empower the right kind of presentation and subsequent confidence during this period surely.
The channels look instead as if they often take a simple sink or swim attitude to the newbie babe. It is very much up to the girl to prove their worth to the operator.
Then if a babe seems to have potential, and she is lucky, she may get the sort of off-screen coaching that we have glimpsed being given to someone like Lola. (She came straight to my mind too KA... Maybe it's easier to let another operator be a 'feeder' in that way?!)
I just wonder if you asked the new babes that have fallen by the wayside in recent months if they could have done with more assistance starting out what they would say about it?
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 01-01-2017 17:07
(01-01-2017 16:42 )ShandyHand Wrote: This is all very true but there is a question of how that confidence can be nurtured in some during the vital formative shows. A babe's make or break moments are often contained in those first three or four shows for me. She either convinces the screen that she has what it takes to stick around or she doesn't. More help couldn't fail to help empower the right kind of presentation and subsequent confidence during this period surely.
The channels look instead as if they often take a simple sink or swim attitude to the newbie babe. It is very much up to the girl to prove their worth to the operator.
Yes this is a very interesting point
.For all the division that she appears to create Kerrie Lee hit BS with a remorseless, fearless dynamism. She is quite a character
like or loathe - take your pick but she hit BS with enormous force of will.I remember Yasmine James doing something similar when she commenced an extended time doing nightshows on RLC.
Then I look at someone like Brooke Lea who took a smidgen longer to really hit the heights at S66 but has blossomed into an exquisite performer.
And now Nicole on BS after her move from Xpanded.
After a few months of settling in quite nicely she really cut loose last night.
Maybe time at Xpanded was a good learning curve for the likes of Nicole, Kerrie, Yasmine etc in respect of subsequent channel moves.
It is interesting to think about how the feel of one channel might be different to another and whether the culture of a channel can inspire or hinder.
Also interesting to reflect on how some of the more established babes may be affected by the new talent on the scene.
Are they inspired or intimidated or neither?
The rise in quality of performances by the likes of Ashley and Alice for example.
Has that in any way been pushed along by the new talent emergence?
Fascinating.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 01-01-2017 19:43
interesting reading above, a few of my thoughts,
i think the biggest problem we have today is that there are no small independent channels anymore where the girls can go to learn and get good where the pressure is not on them,
its interesting seeing snookered147 talk about Yasmine being a star from the off at RLC and taking it like Kerrie has at bs because she didn't,
when she started she was a failure who gt the sack for low call stats but she was lucky in that she got a job at XP where she learned the shows and came back to RLC 6 months later and became a super star,
this makes my point perfectly girls use to have a safety net when starting out as if it didn't work out they could go somewhere else get good and work there way back up, today most just fall out of the babeshows all together as there is no way to get back in,
we need more channels like XP who don't expect girls to be stars from day one,
i have heard of girls getting criticized after 3 shows for not matching the girl on the next bed who has 10 years on the shows call stat wise, that needs to stop,
we need more girls to get what Lola had time, its like she was in a different universe to everyone else as i cant think of another girl in the last 5 years who has been given 12 months on a main channel to get good,
really hope 66 she what they have done with her and dont pull the trigger so fast in the future,
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 01-01-2017 19:44
(01-01-2017 17:07 )snookered147 Wrote: ...inspired or intimidated or neither?
The rise in quality of performances by the likes of Ashley and Alice for example.
Has that in any way been pushed along by the new talent emergence?
...
As to the first, this is surely dependent on the babe in question, predicated on personality, character, and on her own personal judgement of current job secruity. Any inspired or intimidated reaction could then affect what we see of her doing her job or aspects of her relationships with her co-workers, just as these sorts of pressures affect many other workplaces.
Pressures (of many varying kinds) sometimes undoubtedly result in changes like ones we have seen with Alice and Ashley. (I'm not saying these were definately pressurised changes in these case of course - we are highly unlikely to ever get a full objective account of such things.) But the point is positive changes are not always brought about by positive factors.
Though, for me, these two babes doing the same kind of stepping up to the plate as it were, at the same time, is quite suggestive of some kind of commercial pressure being behind the change. I wouldn't put it stronger than that.
These questions you raise are fascinating ones.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - lovebabes56 - 01-01-2017 20:51
Then there is the other question - just how much does it take cash wise to get a new station established? I would expect it must take more than probably £500,000 maybe a little more
I think sin TV would still be here had they made sure their cash flow worked a whole heap better than it actually did and they ensure the girls were paid I bet some girls are still owed cash from that debacle