+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255)
+----- Forum: STUDIO 66 TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=66)
+----- Thread: Studio66 & OnlyFans (/showthread.php?tid=74869)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - God of the Babe Shows - 17-10-2018 09:47
I'm not sure of the longevity of OF.
After all they seem to either pay out more than their income and run at a loss, or they dont pay the correct amount of VAT to HMRC.
Either way there is trouble ahead.
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - sharinel - 17-10-2018 09:48
From what I understand the magazine is a completely separate venture. It would be like trying to shut down Virgin Atlantic to make Virgin Media broadband speeds a bit faster, just doesn't work like that.
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - Rake - 17-10-2018 09:58
(17-10-2018 09:47 )God of the Babe Shows Wrote: I'm not sure of the longevity of OF.
After all they seem to either pay out more than their income and run at a loss, or they dont pay the correct amount of VAT to HMRC.
Either way there is trouble ahead.
Can you evidence these allegations? Really interesting stuff.
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - God of the Babe Shows - 17-10-2018 10:07
(17-10-2018 09:58 )Rake Wrote:(17-10-2018 09:47 )God of the Babe Shows Wrote: I'm not sure of the longevity of OF.
After all they seem to either pay out more than their income and run at a loss, or they dont pay the correct amount of VAT to HMRC.
Either way there is trouble ahead.
Can you evidence these allegations? Really interesting stuff.
Not an allegation.
Just basic maths, something does not add up.
They pay the girls 80%.
They pay the Vat man.
They pay the credit card processor.
They pay for hosting etc.
All of that comes to more than 100%
You dont have to be Alan Sugar to see the flaw in the plan.
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - AD82 - 17-10-2018 10:18
^^^^ Surely they pay the girls 80% of the net amount, after taxes, charges etc
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - SecretAgent - 17-10-2018 10:31
^^ I think this more likely proves that the writer is not Alan Sugar
Any body know where they are registered and pay their taxes? What rate they are paying for their card processing etc etc. I’ve written many a business plan in my time and for an operation like this scale is key to success so how many global users do they have? The fact is none of us know so wild speculation is pointless.
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - The Goatman - 17-10-2018 10:34
The schedule on the s66 website only has 6 girls on tomorrow no night girls just 1 cougar
is this a sign of things to come
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - AD82 - 17-10-2018 10:46
(17-10-2018 10:31 )SecretAgent Wrote: ^^ I think this more likely proves that the writer is not Alan Sugar
Any body know where they are registered and pay their taxes? What rate they are paying for their card processing etc etc. I’ve written many a business plan in my time and for an operation like this scale is key to success so how many global users do they have? The fact is none of us know so wild speculation is pointless.
Completely agree, we are pretty much in the dark re £££ (for S66 & girls) so we are guessing at best. We can only assume that the amounts involved are relatively significant to some girls that they are leaving / taking the risk and going on their own
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - admiral decker - 17-10-2018 11:04
(17-10-2018 10:31 )SecretAgent Wrote: Any body know where they are registered and pay their taxes?
Their registered address is in London.
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - KerrAvon - 17-10-2018 11:10
(17-10-2018 09:12 )SecretAgent Wrote: Except they have been updating OF whilst on screen and with content taken in the S66 studio so no it's not true to say all the money they have been earning is through off screen and in their own time effort.
The point I am making though is why so little criticism of girls monetising fan interaction when all the channels have been slagged off when they have done it?
One word really.......fanboyism (nothing personal Secret
)As it's been touched on before the cold-bloodedness of the channels only match the cold-bloodedness & ripping off the babes do to their customers. The tipping intimidation on cams, scamming for goods undelivered, hanging up of calls....it goes on. Even those not quite as criminal in their behaviour will still introduce a new tier of payment for 'exclusive' material, despite the customer thinking they've already subscribed for such things. But it's easier to direct ire at the 'evil' channels than those who've captured & keeping a tight grip on their hearts.
If the babes do indeed pass on an increase to customers to compensate for the 30% the channel are asking for, will it be with a heavy heart or without a moment's thought?
