RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - loveass - 25-10-2011 13:44
This used to be one of the best channels but these days has become to similar a format.
Not enough use of the hot babes they have got and like to see more interaction.
Paige and Ella are so underused and a lot of babes like Stevie have gone.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - wasteofspace - 25-10-2011 14:42
Babestation is more like the QVC shopping channel now selling products the difference is that u can just about see naked women on babestation!!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - vila - 25-10-2011 23:06
Why the fuck don't they cue the welcome speech AFTER the channel ID intro instead of before it's even running?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 25-10-2011 23:36
(25-10-2011 23:06 )vila Wrote: Why the fuck don't they cue the welcome speech AFTER the channel ID intro instead of before it's even running?
Because then I'd have had at least a minute less talking to Paige
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - vila - 25-10-2011 23:54
Actually it would only have been 30 secs less. On the other hand, if they hadn't bothered with the intro at all you would have had an extra 30 secs - and they might just as well have done that because the welcome speech was intended for Freeview but only Sky viewers could actually see and hear Paige while she was doing it. By the time she appeared on Freeview she was talking about Sky.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 26-10-2011 00:09
(25-10-2011 23:54 )vila Wrote: Actually it would only have been 30 secs less. On the other hand, if they hadn't bothered with the intro at all you would have had an extra 30 secs - and they might just as well have done that because the welcome speech was intended for Freeview but only Sky viewers could actually see and hear Paige while she was doing it. By the time she appeared on Freeview she was talking about Sky.
Nah, I was just coming out of the menu when she put the mic down. If she'd started later I'd have lost time.
I know what you mean though, I'm just in a funny mood
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - vila - 26-10-2011 00:20
(26-10-2011 00:09 )The Silent Majority Wrote: (25-10-2011 23:54 )vila Wrote: Actually it would only have been 30 secs less. On the other hand, if they hadn't bothered with the intro at all you would have had an extra 30 secs - and they might just as well have done that because the welcome speech was intended for Freeview but only Sky viewers could actually see and hear Paige while she was doing it. By the time she appeared on Freeview she was talking about Sky.
Nah, I was just coming out of the menu when she put the mic down. If she'd started later I'd have lost time.
I know what you mean though, I'm just in a funny mood
I've agreed that you would have lost time, but not a minute. What I'm saying is that you would have got through even earlier if they hadn't bothered with the mic at all, which would have made more sense as it served no purpose.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 26-10-2011 00:36
(26-10-2011 00:20 )vila Wrote: (26-10-2011 00:09 )The Silent Majority Wrote: Nah, I was just coming out of the menu when she put the mic down.
What I'm saying is that you would have got through even earlier if they hadn't bothered with the mic at all
No I wouldn't. When I got through was determined by when I dialed.
I do actually agree with your point though
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - vila - 26-10-2011 00:46
I was assuming you were in the queue and would have got through when Paige went back on the phone.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - vila - 26-10-2011 03:28
I just don't believe it. I've often complained that when Paige is sharing the screen they nearly always put her on the left where she's continuously threatened by the boxes. Now, for once, they've put her on the right.
And where have they put the boxes this time . . . . . ?
|