+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - lovebabes56 - 23-09-2021 18:20
WTF???
Now how are you supposed to order Gammon & Egg and Chips?
Or will Gammon be rebranded in the supermarket???
How about we send them a Gammon Steak or two and see how thewy react??
RE: Ofcom Discussion - lovebabes56 - 23-09-2021 18:24
(23-09-2021 17:27 )The Goatman Wrote:(23-09-2021 15:33 )winsaw Wrote: ofcom has announced there new list of words that broadcasters shouldn't use
Gammon
Karen
Remoaner
Snowflake
Boomer
apparently all this are now thought to be potentially offensive
really dose make me wonder who they ask to work this stuff out, i fell really sorry for anyone called Karen lol
Wow proper snowflakes
I love gammon
I feel very sorry for proper snowflakes too lol Now they'll ban TV companies weather forecasts from mentioning the white stuff!!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - The tiny giant - 04-11-2021 00:48
(24-03-2021 14:36 )ShandyHand Wrote: Good article on how Ofcom are justifying the planned censorship of video sharing platforms and what will be on first on the agenda when it happens: https://telecoms.com/509108/ofcom-lowers-the-bar-for-online-video-censorship/There's a bigger problem here when you read the link. If a perants have under 16-18 years olds the odds are they are listening to explicit lyrics in music and music videos and playing video games that have age rated on them as well more people now play games online.if they are worried about this then why not put the perant sensor on the WiFi and on there mobile devices this way unless the kids know the password then they can't watch or play anything online. TV shows went backwards when a lady called Mary Whitehouse complained there was to much sex and violence on TV and she got the watershed time on normal TV. As an m.p told her if there something on TV channel you don't like to watch either change the channel or turn the TV off. If a person wants to do something they will find away no matter in how much protection TV stations, mobile device company's, internet providers can do to stop this
Of course once the mechanism is in place any new hot buzz term can be roped in as they see fit.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - ShandyHand - 04-11-2021 02:32
(04-11-2021 00:48 )The tiny giant Wrote: There's a bigger problem here when you read the link. If a perants have under 16-18 years olds the odds are they are listening to explicit lyrics in music and music videos and playing video games that have age rated on them as well more people now play games online.if they are worried about this then why not put the perant sensor on the WiFi and on there mobile devices this way unless the kids know the password then they can't watch or play anything online. TV shows went backwards when a lady called Mary Whitehouse complained there was to much sex and violence on TV and she got the watershed time on normal TV. As an m.p told her if there something on TV channel you don't like to watch either change the channel or turn the TV off. If a person wants to do something they will find away no matter in how much protection TV stations, mobile device company's, internet providers can do to stop this
You are thinking too sensibly lol. The Ofcom board doesn't want control given to parents REALLY - though they pander to the idea sometimes. All censors (all quangos) want to stay in POWER. That is motivation number one. Self justification is all. Extending their reach is number two. The rest follows from those things...
The Sky boxes have potential passwords. Internet browsers have parental settings... It all means not a lot to Ofcom in terms of what they will censor because they think parents and guardians of the vulnerable are not to be trusted. Britain has always had this 'Elites* know best' mothering attitude to the great unwashed general populous. Ofcom are the ultimate example of that patronising attitude. Only their unelected version of the great and the good is to be trusted with what you can see and hear because... well the true answer is very comfortable jobs thank you very much.
The repugnant Mary Whitehouse would indeed be cock-a-hoop at the record levels of offence bodies are able to manufacturer today; how people are encouraged left and right (so much self justification in this as I say) to find 'hurt' feelings in every sphere. How we revel as a society in victimhood and cast aside all levels of personal responsibility. The Ofcom panel are the reincarnations of a bunch of Mary Whitehouses though they'd never admit it. Only the excuses have been dressed up for the modern age. The attitude - the assumption of moral authority - is exactly the same.
* Not a word I bandy about lightly.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - russmeyer - 08-11-2021 12:00
Studio66 mentioned in todays ofcom broadcast bulletin few shows in breach of the broadcast code? anyone know who the girl might have been
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/227661/Studio-66-TV,-Studio-66,-Various-dates-and-times-between-1-March-2021-and-18-April-2021.pdf
RE: Ofcom Discussion - t-belltosin - 09-11-2021 18:36
Would love to know who it was and hopefully its been recorded on the forum somewhere! Thanks Ofcom for bringing it to my attention
RE: Ofcom Discussion - ShandyHand - 11-11-2021 18:32
Totally independent. Nothing to see here. Move along...
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/nov/10/ex-tory-adviser-married-mp-choose-ofcom-chair
RE: Ofcom Discussion - The tiny giant - 18-11-2021 19:59
I know the babe or babes who ofcom has told off for there shows. Google the ofcom rules that someone has posted on a thread on here and everyone will have a better understanding about babe channels
RE: Ofcom Discussion - t-belltosin - 21-11-2021 16:36
(18-11-2021 19:59 )The tiny giant Wrote: I know the babe or babes who ofcom has told off for there shows. Google the ofcom rules that someone has posted on a thread on here and everyone will have a better understanding about babe channels
who were the girls?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - The tiny giant - 29-11-2021 00:04
(21-11-2021 16:36 )t-belltosin Wrote:This isn't for me to say but it is online at ofcom rules laws 32.3 in which these babe or babes are named(18-11-2021 19:59 )The tiny giant Wrote: I know the babe or babes who ofcom has told off for there shows. Google the ofcom rules that someone has posted on a thread on here and everyone will have a better understanding about babe channels
who were the girls?