+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Sin TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=347)
+---- Thread: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=63996)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - southlondonphil - 24-07-2015 09:07
(20-07-2015 23:46 )mrmann Wrote: Maybe the producers just wanted easy sex and quick cash, and didn't intend to stay on for longer?
Your claims couldn't be further from the truth. There was a strict 'no fraternisation' rule in place at Sin TV and any breach of the rule carried a punishment of instant dismissal.
As for not staying on for longer, the owners expected to lose money in the short term, just not as much as they did. Their long term plan was to eventually acquire more channels.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - SecretAgent - 24-07-2015 09:18
Can people stop picking holes in mrmanns fantasies please. This is the funniest thread on the forum at the moment
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Pixel - 24-07-2015 09:20
(23-07-2015 22:31 )mrmann Wrote: <snips mindless drivel>
Your every utterance on this forum just underlines your complete disconnect from the real world. It's like you live in a bubble. Have you ever actually interacted with a fellow human being? You clearly have no idea about business, how TV studios run, how males and females relate. No matter what people tell you, and no matter what facts are presented, you just dismiss them. It's bizarre.
As for your suggestion that people went to all the trouble of setting up Sin TV in order to have some easy sex with those models/prostitutes (in your eyes) and earn some quick cash is so ludicrous it's not even funny, it's pathetic.
Get some help.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 24-07-2015 09:22
(23-07-2015 22:31 )mrmann Wrote: ^Haha. See, now that's a nice constructive response from you!
Hard to say what regular is...
mrmann, I have a hypothetical question.
If someone else were to have seen all the examples of these activities that you say has given you this view of what goes on at the channels... for how many of these examples might this second person come to a different interpretation of what was happening in each case do you think?
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - hairbald - 24-07-2015 10:18
I think you have to strike a balance here.
There have been some well documented cases (in one case just a couple of months ago) where things have happened on camera in plain sight. What we don't know is how prevelant that becomes off camera; I'm pretty sure that every break the girls don't get fucked - if they did you have to be slightly intimidated
The production crew are by and large young blokes starting their media careers so I assume may be moderately attractive to the ladies
. Lots of relationships happen at work (met my wife at work) but for most of us the working day doesn't include naked ladies talking filth (sadly).So I suspect things do happen off camera but perhaps not as often as some would assume.
A number of girls escort; some openly, others less so. I've met both types. As a percentage, don't know what that equates to. What I would say is that being an escort doesn't mean they will fuck the production team. On the contrary most escorts are keenly aware of their "value" and wouldn't just sleep with anyone; oddly a number of ladies that escort are almost puritanical in their view towards one night stands and mentally seperate Escorting from their personal sexual activities.
So that's me sat firmly on the fence between Mrmann and the rest of you
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - gunnar - 24-07-2015 10:51
^The obvious case I can think of is Ruby summers.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - shano123 - 24-07-2015 10:53
Use to be registered on this forum and use to watch the channels, regarding sintv can someone just give the story on what went down with this channel and why they were taken off air??
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Pixel - 24-07-2015 10:56
^ Why don't you just read the thread?
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - bigglesworth - 25-07-2015 11:25
It appears that Sin TV have a studio in place for the relaunch - at least that's the information filtering through to the girls.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - DB83 - 25-07-2015 13:11
(25-07-2015 11:25 )bigglesworth Wrote: It appears that Sin TV have a studio in place for the relaunch - at least that's the information filtering through to the girls.
Indeed. There was a tweet to that effect published in these pages a week ago.
Maybe they think that all those girls they have screwed (financially that is) will come flooding back. Or maybe they also believe that fairies live in the bottom of the garden.
But they have got little to no chance to recruit or restart if their outstanding liabilities are not met, and in full, before that launch. Who would be daft enough to work there if they are still owed money with the faint promise of getting it sometime in the future ?