Storm Daytime - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237) +---- Forum: Storm Daytime (/forumdisplay.php?fid=116) +---- Thread: Storm Daytime - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=12278) |
RE: Why, oh why, oh why? - SOOPSOOP - 06-10-2009 02:19 Goodness, and there's me thinking it was just a matter of getting an eyeful. RE: Why, oh why, oh why? - Shalashaska - 06-10-2009 06:19 To many big words in this thread... So this is what it's like to be dumb RE: Why, oh why, oh why? - Bob Paradiso - 06-10-2009 07:56 Gents, I love this place. An interesting chat about The Powers That Be: enlightened, informative and educational. (I'll make the Boffins read it as soon as they've stopped playing World of Warcraft). That's followed by a gigantic picture of a lass with a pair of enormous hooters and a cry to sign her up. I won't tell you which posting drew my eye the most. RE: Why, oh why, oh why? - Hazhard - 06-10-2009 23:14 (06-10-2009 01:41 )Colbert Rules Wrote: Bob try to sign Demi from Party People, she's a babe. I second that Colbert, i really miss her from our screens RE: Why, oh why, oh why? - IanG - 08-10-2009 17:19 (06-10-2009 01:25 )vostok 1 Wrote:(05-10-2009 23:46 )IanG Wrote: vostok1, your points are all valid however, the babe channels do not fall under normal TV programming guidelines (but the sex channels do). The difference is that the babe channels operate both as a premium rate telephone service and, simultaneously, the promotional advertising for that service. Although changes are afoot in the newer Audiovisual Media Services (AVMS) Directive, issues of product placement obvously feature in what the babe channels actually 'sell'. The fact is, Ofcom, ICSTIS and the ASA all share some regulatory responsibility over the babe channels - there's a schizophrenic maelstrom of codes and legislation that the channels have to conform to. Vostok1, this is probably not the place to carry on this discussion however, I'd say people should read the LSE report Ofcom commissioned into "the effects of pornography" back in 2003/4. The interesting point, at least to my way of thinking, is that this doesn't stick to what the Comms Act requires of Ofcom (i.e. the "protection of the under 18s"). The LSE report is in two distinct sections - protection of the under 18s and, oddly, the supposed effects on the over 18s. The first section re under 18s - the bit Ofcom are leaglly required and empowered to pay attention to - concludes that there's no direct evidence of any harm of porn to children. Of course that doesn't surprise me as evolution wouldn't and doesn't create creatures that can be damaged by a full working knowledge of their means of reproduction (no matter what their age). The second part of the report then drifts off into a pointless exercise because what adults do has bugger all to do with what's on TV (unless of course all the raping and pillaging of yesteryear can be arributed to Stone/Bronze/Iron Age TV services...?). girls in advertisement! - ferrarimad26 - 21-12-2009 13:48 could sum 1 please tell me who the girls are in the advert wen the show goes on a break! i would really like to know thanks RE: girls in advertisement! - Bluearmy71 - 21-12-2009 14:11 Juliet, Sammie Pennington and Chelsea, they have all since moved to other channels Julite = TVX Sammie Pennington = Elite daytime only Chelsea = BangBabes There is enough threads on them all if you look in both day and night sections of the forum! RE: girls in advertisement! - ferrarimad26 - 21-12-2009 14:15 thank you blue army ur a legend RE: girls in advertisement! - Ree's No.1 fan - 21-12-2009 14:22 (21-12-2009 14:11 )Bluearmy71 Wrote: Juliet, Sammie Pennington and Chelsea, they have all since moved to other channels Does make me think that Bob should shoot a new advert rather than having three former babes on the CP trailer. Morgan and Monica certainly jump out as representative for night and day shows. RE: girls in advertisement! - fendercat - 22-12-2009 00:18 New advert a great idea! How about; Monica +/- Amy +/- Chelsea(Tara) ??? + +/- Karen Wood if she's still on the channel, haven't seen her for a while. (You'd have to work in calf shots somehow though ) CP would have an advert that's better than most shows Incidentally I did find out that although it's not Bob himself doing the voiceover for the current advert, he did write it. Unsurprisingly. |