+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bang Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Thread: Last night's freeview show (/showthread.php?tid=13223)
RE: Last night's freeview show - Rammyrascal - 16-11-2009 20:32
well you two definately like to push the boundaries and hope you continue to do so
RE: Last night's freeview show - SirAssAlot - 17-11-2009 09:35
TheWatcher i posted the vid on http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=13460&pid=281068#pid281068.
Check your 5:02am recordings & you'll see.
RE: Last night's freeview show - TheWatcher - 17-11-2009 10:25
(17-11-2009 09:35 )Tintin Wrote: TheWatcher i posted the vid on http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=13460&pid=281068#pid281068.
Check your 5:02am recordings & you'll see.
The freeview show at 5.02am on 15Nov09 was different to your Sky vid
See http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=13460&pid=281336#pid281336
Last nights show was pretty boring.
It was just 2 girls, Adele and Valery.
It looked as if they were short of callers last night.
RE: Last night's freeview show - Censorship :-( - 18-11-2009 01:24
(17-11-2009 10:25 )TheWatcher Wrote: Last nights show was pretty boring.
It was just 2 girls, Adele and Valery.
It looked as if they were short of callers last night.
I didn't expect much when I saw that Adele was on, as she has been one of the tamest babes on BBF (perhaps the most tame of all? - were it not for Lilly’s ‘office’ section a few days ago, she would probably have received that ‘accolade’). Valery was better, but not as good as her previous appearance.
How is Adele on real BB?
Perhaps the lack of callers will encourage them to put on a better show this morning, or will we have to wait until the weekend, again, for a (relatively) good show?
RE: Last night's freeview show - DanVox - 18-11-2009 01:37
Amanda seems to have random WTF?#! moments with someone off-screen. My guess is different cameramen or producers have different boundaries, one lets her play, another says "no, not for real, even if off camera". They might well be setting her up, but short of witholding fees she won't be punished. It's the channel that gets fined, and named owners/producers who can get banned from owning a licence in future. The constant repeat bookings mean they can't blame her.
BTW anyone know if Cyrus will ever return to SportXXX ? Now she did have a short run.
PS. If Ofcom really want to punish the channels they should be more inventive. Live spanking will show them. (crosses fingers).
RE: Last night's freeview show - Josh187 - 18-11-2009 03:47
(18-11-2009 01:37 )DanVox Wrote: Amanda seems to have random WTF?#! moments with someone off-screen. My guess is different cameramen or producers have different boundaries, one lets her play, another says "no, not for real, even if off camera". They might well be setting her up, but short of witholding fees she won't be punished. It's the channel that gets fined, and named owners/producers who can get banned from owning a licence in future. The constant repeat bookings mean they can't blame her.
BTW anyone know if Cyrus will ever return to SportXXX ? Now she did have a short run.
PS. If Ofcom really want to punish the channels they should be more inventive. Live spanking will show them. (crosses fingers).
Like i've said in previous posts she probably gets really pissed off with the Cameraman/Producer or whoever is telling her off. I think she's not happy with how she has to act on freeview, she is allowed to get away with much more before freeview, and probably gets worked up about how tame and restricted her performances has to be. Let me just say this, Amanda has fight and fury, i wouldn't like to be the producer giving her a telling off because i would be in for a fight
On the Cyprus issue, maybe Sportxxx let her go, for showing off to much asshole
RE: Last night's freeview show - TheWatcher - 18-11-2009 11:11
Last night started with an hour of Charlie Monaco. The mic was not working when she was using it.
Then Amanda came on for 45 minutes. We could not hear anything she was saying on the mic during her 2 minute introduction speech.
Next came the 12 minute video advertising the OfficeBabes. Not seen this before. It was similar to the HouseBabes video.
Amanda then came back for the last half hour, and the mic was working for her this time.
On the whole, a bit better than average show.
RE: Last night's freeview show - TheWatcher - 19-11-2009 09:56
The first few minutes of the show last night was just the view of an empty bed.
It did not get much more interesting afterwards.
It was just 2 girls on the show, Jet and Annie.
At least the mics were working ok for a change.
RE: Last night's freeview show - Censorship :-( - 21-11-2009 11:15
What are Bang Media playing at? They are only on Freeview for 2.5 hours, yet they wasted the opening 15 minutes with adverts!? Ok, the ads were more entertaining than much of BBF’s output, but we’ve seen them a few times now, so it’s getting rather boring.
Talking of which, this morning's show:-
Tori – Typically tame, I’m afraid.
Cate – It was nice to see her again, as she hasn’t been on for a while, and though relatively OK, it was one of her tamer performances, sadly. It seems as though she was great with Amanda on real BB
Cate & Donna – tame, no kissing, licking etc, but due to more movement & better posing etc., it was still better than the feeble 2 girl norm on Tamestation Freeview.
Adele - Just as tame as normal, I’m afraid.
Donna – Not great, but an OK solo section from Donna; probably the high point of the show?
Overall, another quite poor BBF, but far from the worst I’ve seen.
RE: Last night's freeview show - TheWatcher - 21-11-2009 12:16
I thought last night's show was ok, slightly better than average, due to the fact that all of the girls, Tori, Adele, Cate and Donna are in my favourites list.
I also thought the last 30 minutes by Donna was the highlight. She looked fabulous.
The first 14 minutes was the officeBabes video advert which has been on before.