+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Babeworld (/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+---- Thread: Chelsea (/showthread.php?tid=135)
RE: Chelsea - scotiboy - 21-02-2009 01:07
[ removed by request }
RE: Chelsea - artvandelay - 21-02-2009 12:43
Shame to see her going down the escorting route when she hasn't even done full frontal pics yet
RE: Chelsea - biker200 - 21-02-2009 18:26
COME ON SIX NUMBERS , PLEASE DROP IN THIS WEEK!!!!!
RE: Chelsea - cherryryder - 21-02-2009 19:04
This may be a big ask but does anyone have any pics of Chelsea not looking miserable?
RE: Chelsea - steven6 - 21-02-2009 21:26
escorting?
RE: Chelsea - Chilly - 21-02-2009 21:34
steven6 Wrote:escorting?
escorting = prostitution
RE: Chelsea - steven6 - 21-02-2009 21:43
i know that im just shocked i wonder if she doing that maybe she'll do porn
RE: Chelsea - firekind - 22-02-2009 01:05
Chilly Wrote:steven6 Wrote:escorting?
escorting = prostitution
with an extra 0 on the price
RE: Chelsea - zombie60 - 22-02-2009 04:17
firekind Wrote:She does come across as really fucking common and thick to be fair. Also have you noticed she never ever gets those huge wangers out fully without a bra underneith to prop them up?Chilly Wrote:steven6 Wrote:escorting?
escorting = prostitution
with an extra 0 on the price
Its a shame because theres nothing nicer in my opinion than a couple of big naturals swinging away unsupported, even if they do droop. Maybe she thinks looking her tits looking saggy will decrease the amount of paying customers and saves that experience for fellas willing to pay for the privilege in private!
RE: Chelsea - firekind - 22-02-2009 11:39
most women are screwed up in the head when it comes to how they look. this is why when they get boob jobs and they look like shit they see it differently.