20 F UK Just split with Bf lads - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19) +--- Forum: Member Introductions & Personal Talk (/forumdisplay.php?fid=87) +---- Forum: Sex Talk (/forumdisplay.php?fid=113) +---- Thread: 20 F UK Just split with Bf lads (/showthread.php?tid=46152) |
RE: 20 F UK Just split with Bf lads - mellover - 04-05-2012 15:32 (04-05-2012 13:09 )rickhardo Wrote: No, no I was saying that the OP is clearly not a woman. Twas a joke. And I'm sorry but your reply just made me laugh, I was in a silly mood. No probs mate. Cross lines, easy done. RE: 20 F UK Just split with Bf lads - Clit Eastwood - 04-05-2012 16:56 This thread has not been entertained by the so called Nikki 4 a while...either a wind up....or the poor girl has come 2 her senses..lol....she needs more wine...RED OR WHITE DEAR ?... RE: 20 F UK Just split with Bf lads - tee - 08-05-2012 13:04 Dude. It was a fake person posting some fake pics. In every pic it's a differant pic. Can't believe how ppl get enticed so easily. Get a grip. It was sum1 having a laugh RE: 20 F UK Just split with Bf lads - rickhardo - 08-05-2012 17:28 (08-05-2012 13:04 )tee Wrote: Can't believe how ppl get enticed so easily. One word - pussy. RE: 20 F UK Just split with Bf lads - cwpussylover - 08-05-2012 18:03 (08-05-2012 17:28 )rickhardo Wrote:(08-05-2012 13:04 )tee Wrote: Can't believe how ppl get enticed so easily. RE: 20 F UK Just split with Bf lads - spider - 13-05-2012 15:37 well i would love to gang fuck you niki and share some cock with you. xxx RE: 20 F UK Just split with Bf lads - jdizzle - 11-06-2012 23:23 wat a quality thread, those pics are hot and you have a sweet pussy that i wouldnt mind playing with RE: 20 F UK Just split with Bf lads - Tumble_Drier - 11-06-2012 23:31 (03-05-2012 09:48 )tee Wrote: Well they look professionally taken pics. They r not from a mobile phone or anything. I could take better photos with a mobile phone, never mind one of my cameras. Professional they most certainly are not. |