+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255)
+----- Forum: Studio 66 USA (/forumdisplay.php?fid=332)
+----- Thread: Studio66 USA - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=60673)
RE: Studio66 USA - fucu2 - 06-06-2014 23:44
On the whole I am not a fan of most US stars so depends who is on and the quality of the feed to if I will watch and phone, would have prefered more UK girls but hey ho
RE: Studio66 USA - Scottishbloke - 07-06-2014 01:23
(06-06-2014 21:39 )admiral decker Wrote: It's not on tonight. When it is on they will still be broadcasting, wherever the feed comes from, so will still have to bother about it.
If they wanted to save costs they would have to shut one of their channels down. Starting an ambitious project of broadcasting permanently from the USA is not the way to cut costs.
Just what the fuck is ambitious about setting up a webcam directly from the USA. Did you even see the last show
It must have cost about 2 bob to make, ambitious - My fucking arse it is
PS - Lose the tag line - forum bully, you're bloody useless at it
RE: Studio66 USA - kevin symons - 07-06-2014 03:25
I think it's pretty poor criticising things you haven't seen yet. If it's poor I will criticise it myself, but I will give it a fair chance first.
I don't see anywhere that it's been confirmed as being a low quality webcam, so presenting that as a fact is obviously untruthful.
In reality we will have to wait and see what's on offer. I think it could be something that works well for them, but for now we don't know.
RE: Studio66 USA - tony confederate - 07-06-2014 04:40
(07-06-2014 01:23 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Just what the fuck is ambitious about setting up a webcam directly from the USA.
If it is a webcam (not yet confirmed) then the whole idea is hugely ambitious, so admiral decker is right.
After all, you can see webcams online already which includes pornstars, so to make it work on TV (with the inevitable restrictions of TV) is a very ambitious undertaking indeed and they will do well to make a success of it.
RE: Studio66 USA - Scottishbloke - 07-06-2014 04:43
Sorry so putting on a watered down webcam show on the telly is what you'd call ambitious, how did you figure that one out Sherlock
Like admiral you're also talking nonsense
PS admiral going by your avator are you the captain of the Titanic in disguise left with only a dinghy now that you've sunk the ship
RE: Studio66 USA - tony confederate - 07-06-2014 05:17
(07-06-2014 04:43 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Sorry so putting on a watered down webcam show on the telly is what you'd call ambitious, how did you figure that one out Sherlock
It would be an ambitious project because the high aspirations sought would be difficult to achieve and would therefore require exceptional effort.
Do you really need it explained to you?
RE: Studio66 USA - HannahsPet - 07-06-2014 10:45
hoping they have the brains to do what BS have done with australia ie have a proper studio set up and then broadcast properly from the states i mean if news channels like CNN can do it why can S66 in a smaller scale
RE: Studio66 USA - RatedR - 07-06-2014 10:54
(07-06-2014 10:45 )HannahsPet Wrote: if news channels like CNN can do it
as long as Piers Morgan isn't on the beds
RE: Studio66 USA - fucu2 - 07-06-2014 11:16
(07-06-2014 10:54 )RatedR Wrote:(07-06-2014 10:45 )HannahsPet Wrote: if news channels like CNN can do it
as long as Piers Morgan isn't on the beds
he won't be, thanks to ofcom we cant see cunts on the babe channels
RE: Studio66 USA - HannahsPet - 07-06-2014 12:00
haha reminds me of the stephen fry joke whats the definition of Countryside " Killing Piers Morgan " doesnt really work in the writtern word think he means cuntricide
