+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: The Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=408)
+--- Thread: Is babestation now worse than s66? (/showthread.php?tid=64331)
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - ShandyHand - 11-04-2015 21:57
(11-04-2015 21:49 )M-L-L Wrote:what's s66 ? Sheffield isn't it ? (he asked innocently)
More Rotherham actually.
By strange coincidence, I hear that they have trouble keeping hold of their good-looking women too. 
(No, no, it's not true! I like the North - I went there once.
)P.S. Snookered, stop telling them about my best hiding places. You'll have them looking under the bed next. Oh, damn...
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - Snooks - 11-04-2015 23:08
(11-04-2015 21:57 )ShandyHand Wrote: P.S. Snookered, stop telling them about my best hiding places. You'll have them looking under the bed next. Oh, damn...
Yes but to be fair there are that many beds at S66 it would be hard to tell which one you might be hiding under
.You set em up.
I'll score
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - circles_o_o_o - 11-07-2015 19:59
No, I wouldn't say so at the moment.
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - HannahsPet - 12-07-2015 12:55
Actually Bs is still hundred times better than S66 BS has much better lineup
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - winsaw - 12-07-2015 13:07
based on recent output, got to say bs is far ahead of 66, never thought i would be saying that,
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - retah-rotaredom - 12-07-2015 13:19
Both are a pale shadow of their former selves. It is like comparing something dull with something insipid.
They have both deteriorated very dramatically this calendar year, on the back of a steady, less precipitous decline since 2010. Same can be said of all the main players though. Sad times we inhabit.
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - Snooks - 13-07-2015 01:43
In terms of nightshow output right now S66 is so atrocious that it would be almost impossible for any channel of any type to be worse.
Yes BS are pretty awful as well as indeed all the channels are but they are infinitely superior to S66 at present.
Mind you Songs of Praise is more stimulating than S66 at present
.
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - Joey 27 - 13-07-2015 02:41
Both are as bad as each other in terms of nightshow output, however Babestation do have quite a few actual babes on their roster whilst S66 only have about three babes on their roster, one does a 2 hour nightshow once a month and the other two are currently on a break from S66
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - amy1 - 13-07-2015 11:47
I think babestation went down hill when savanna left, not that she was the reason but their drop in quality seemed to coincide with the time she left.
I still remember her and preeti on the massage table all oiled up. it was a beautiful sight, but alas, those days have gone.
S66 has the best daygirls, but the nightshows are squalor dressed up as dross and the recent signings dont make me turn over, they make me not bother in the first place.
RE: Is babestation now worse than s66? - KerrAvon - 13-07-2015 12:26
Got to agree with the general sentiments here. BS has miles the better night roster but are so generally sabotaging the output of the shows they're actually not that much better than S66.
The BS shows actually look like what they're meant to be, a relentless money making machine. They used to be better at least masking it with more spontaneous boundary pushing shows, that they occasionally hint at on their FV climax sessions. But used to be so much more. Can't believe I've reached the point where I sometimes cant be bothered with a line up of Dannii Harwood, Lucy Summers, Caty Cole, Jenna Hoskins etc.
As for S66 on nights, you can't sabotage it's output when it's too poor to begin with. Even their day babes are showing them up.